ABSTRACT
Luminol and 1,10-phenanthroline are widely used chemiluminescent (CL) reagents for the analysis of a wide range of metals and inorganic and organic complexes. While the fundamental mechanism for luminol and 1,10-phenantholine chemiluminescence is understood, the analytical application of these reagents is largely empirical and often poorly described mechanistically. For example, CL signals observed from metal-luminol systems are strongly dependent on the pH of the sample, even though the final pH of the reaction mixture is controlled to a narrow range by a buffer. Other investigators report significant changes in CL signal due to freshness and the acidity of reagents. Our work shows that many of these effects are due to dissolved CO2 present or formed in the analytical system. The hypothesis that carbon dioxide plays a pivotal role in enhancing luminol CL is supported by direct manipulation of CO2(aq) concentrations by the addition of CO2(g) or carbonic anhydrase. In contrast, Cu(II) analysis using the CL reagent 1,10-phenanthroline is completely quenched in the presence of CO2(aq). A plausible mechanism for these observations involves the reaction between superoxide, produced in these analytical systems, and CO2(aq) to form the peroxycarbonate radical, *C04-. The formation of *CO4- has very important analytical implications since this species appears to enhance or quench the CL signal from luminol and 1,10-phenanthroline, respectively.
