Comparing Outcomes Between Direct and ED Admissions for Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric direct admissions (DA) have multiple benefits including reduced emergency department (ED) volumes, greater patient and provider satisfaction, and decreased costs without compromising patient safety. We sought to compare resource utilization and outcomes between patients with a primary diagnosis of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia directly admitted with those admitted from the ED. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study at a large, academic, free-standing children's hospital (2017-2021). Patients were between 24 hours and 14 days old with a gestational age of ≥35 weeks, admitted with a primary diagnosis of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), time to clinical care, resource utilization, NICU transfer, and 7-day readmission for phototherapy. RESULTS: A total of 1098 patients were included, with 276 (25.1%) ED admissions and 822 (74.9%) DAs. DAs experienced a shorter median time to bilirubin level collection (1.9 vs 2.1 hours, P = .003), received less intravenous fluids (8.9% vs 51.4%, P < .001), had less bilirubin levels collected (median of 3.0 vs 4.0, P < .001), received phototherapy sooner (median of 0.8 vs 4.2 hours, P < .001), and had a shorter LOS (median of 21 vs 23 hours, P = .002). One patient who was directly admitted required transfer to the NICU. No differences were observed in the 7-day readmission rates for phototherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Directly admitting patients for the management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia is a preferred alternative to ED admission as our study demonstrated that DAs had a shorter time to clinical care, shorter LOS, and less unnecessary resource utilization with no difference in 7-day readmissions for phototherapy.

Shifting practice in pediatric prescription opioid use in the emergency department for fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Judicious opioid use is important for balancing patient comfort and safety. Although opioid use is well studied in adult populations, pediatric opioid prescription practices are less understood and there are very few guidelines regarding its usage. The purpose of this study was to investigate pediatric opioid prescription trends by emergency medicine physicians over the last ten years, including assessing proxies for the adequacy of pain control and risk of any opioid-related adverse events including overdose. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients age 0 to 18 who presented to an urban county hospital emergency department (ED) between 2007 and 2017 for acute fracture care. Data collected included age, opioids given in the ED, opioid prescriptions from the ED, adverse events, and secondary opioid prescriptions. Opioid prescription quantities were assessed in morphine equivalents (Meqs). RESULTS: Out of 4713 patients diagnosed with acute fracture, opioid prescriptions from the ED were given to 1772 patients (37.6%), with a mean quantity of 107.0 Meqs (SD = 69.1). Over the ten-year period studied, prescription rates declined from 54.8% in 2007 to 13.6% in 2017. Although 201 (4.3%) fracture patients had a second fracture-related ED visit, only 27 visits (0.57%) were for inadequate pain control, with no significant differences in year-to-year analysis. During the ten-year study period, there were zero opioid overdoses reported among pediatric fracture patients. CONCLUSIONS: A major shift has occurred in the last ten years, as emergency medicine physicians now favor non-opioid pain management regimens over opioids for the majority of pediatric fracture patients. There was no increase in the rate of inadequate pain control requiring a return to the ED, even as opioid prescription rates declined during the study period.

Prehospital Epinephrine Use in Pediatric Anaphylaxis by Emergency Medical Services.

OBJECTIVES: Anaphylaxis requires prompt assessment and management with epinephrine to reduce its morbidity and mortality. This study examined the prehospital management of pediatric anaphylactic reactions in Northeast Ohio. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review using emergency medical service (EMS) run charts of patients 18 years and younger from February 2015 to April 2019. Patient charts with the diagnosis of "anaphylaxis" or "allergic reaction" were reviewed and confirmed that symptoms met anaphylaxis criteria. Information regarding epinephrine administration before EMS arrival and medications given by EMS providers was collected. Analysis was performed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: From 646 allergic/anaphylactic reaction EMS run charts, 150 (23%) met the guideline criteria for anaphylaxis. The median patient age was 12 years. Only 57% (86/150) of these patients received intramuscular epinephrine, and the majority received it before EMS arrival. Epinephrine was administered by EMS to 32% (30/94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 22.7% to 42.3%) of patients who had not already received epinephrine. The odds of receiving prehospital epinephrine were significantly lower for patients 5 years and younger (risk difference [RD], -0.23; 95% CI, -0.43 to -0.04), those with no history of allergic reaction (RD, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.03), those who presented with lethargy (RD, -0.43; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.06), and those whose trigger was a medication or environmental allergen (RD, -0.47; 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.23 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medical service providers in this region demonstrated similar use of epinephrine as reported elsewhere. However, 43% (64/150) of pediatric patients meeting anaphylaxis criteria did not receive prehospital epinephrine, and 10% (15/150) received no treatment whatsoever. Efforts to improve EMS provider recognition and prompt epinephrine administration in pediatric cases of anaphylaxis seem necessary.