The biportal transorbital approach: quantitative comparison of the anterior subfrontal craniotomy, bilateral transorbital endoscopic, and microscopic approaches.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the surgical use and applicability of a biportal bitransorbital approach. Single-portal transorbital and combined transorbital transnasal approaches have been used in clinical practice, but no study has assessed the surgical use and applicability of a biportal bitransorbital approach. METHODS: Ten cadaver specimens underwent midline anterior subfrontal (ASub), bilateral transorbital microsurgery (bTMS), and bilateral transorbital neuroendoscopic surgery (bTONES) approaches. Morphometric analyses included the length of the bilateral cranial nerves I and II, the optic tract, and A1; the area of exposure of the anterior cranial fossa floor; craniocaudal and mediolateral angles of attack (AOAs); and volume of surgical freedom (VSF; maximal available working volume for a specific surgical corridor and surgical target structure normalized to a height of 10 mm) of the bilateral paraclinoid internal carotid arteries (ICAs), bilateral terminal ICAs, and anterior communicating artery (ACoA). Analyses were conducted to determine whether the biportal approach was associated with greater instrument freedom. RESULTS: The bTMS and bTONES approaches provided limited access to the bilateral A1 segments and the ACoA, which were inaccessible in 30% (bTMS) and 60% (bTONES) of exposures. The average total frontal lobe area of exposure (AOE) was 1648.4 mm2 (range 1516.6-1958.8 mm2) for ASub, 1658.9 mm2 (1274.6-1988.2 mm2) for bTMS, and 1914.9 mm2 (1834.2-2014.2 mm2) for bTONES exposures, with no statistically significant superiority between any of the 3 approaches (p = 0.28). The bTMS and bTONES approaches were significantly associated with decreases of 8.7 mm3 normalized volume (p = 0.005) and 14.3 mm3 normalized volume (p < 0.001) for VSF of the right paraclinoid ICA compared with the ASub approach. No statistically significant difference in surgical freedom was noted between all 3 approaches when targeting the bilateral terminal ICA. The bTONES approach was significantly associated with a decrease of 105% in the (log) VSF of the ACoA compared with the ASub (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Although the biportal approach is intended to improve maneuverability within these minimally invasive approaches, these results illustrate the pertinent issue of surgical corridor crowding and the importance of surgical trajectory planning. A biportal transorbital approach provides improved visualization but does not improve surgical freedom. Furthermore, although it affords impressive anterior cranial fossa AOE, it is unsuitable for addressing midline lesions because the preserved orbital rim restricts lateral movement. Further comparative studies will elucidate whether a combined transorbital transnasal route is preferable to minimize skull base destruction and maximize instrument access.

Improving the metric of surgical freedom in the laboratory based on a novel concept of volume.

BACKGROUND: In laboratory-based neuroanatomical studies, surgical freedom, the most important metric of instrument maneuverability, has been based on Heron's formula. Inaccuracies and limitations hinder this study design's applicability. A new methodology, volume of surgical freedom (VSF), may produce a more realistic qualitative and quantitative representation of a surgical corridor. METHODS: Overall, 297 data set measurements assessing surgical freedom were completed for cadaveric brain neurosurgical approach dissections. Heron's formula and VSF were calculated specifically to different surgical anatomical targets. Quantitative accuracy and the results of an analysis of human error were compared. RESULTS: Heron's formula for irregularly shaped surgical corridors resulted in overestimation of the respective areas (minimum overestimation 31.3%). In 92% (188/204) of data sets reviewed for influence of offset, areas calculated on the basis of measured data points were larger than areas calculated on the basis of the translated best-fit plane points (mean [SD] overestimation of 2.14% [2.62%]). Variability in the probe length attributable to human error was small (mean [SD] calculated probe length 190.26 mm [5.57 mm]). CONCLUSIONS: VSF is an innovative concept that can develop a model of a surgical corridor producing better assessment and prediction of the ability to maneuver and manipulate surgical instruments. VSF corrects for deficits in Heron's method by generating the correct area for an irregular shape using the shoelace formula, adjusting the data points to account for offset, and attempting to correct for human error. VSF produces 3-dimensional models and, therefore, is a preferable standard for assessing surgical freedom.

Comparative Analysis of Surgical Exposure among Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to Petrosectomy: An Experimental Study in Cadavers.

Objectives Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) for petrosectomies are evolving to reduce perioperative brain injuries and complications. Surgical terminology, techniques, landmarks, advantages, and limitations of these approaches remain ill defined. We quantitatively analyzed the anatomical relationships and differences between EEA exposures for medial, inferior, and inferomedial petrosectomies. Design This study presents anatomical dissection and quantitative analysis. Setting Cadaveric heads were used for dissection. EEAs were performed using the medial petrosectomy (MP), the inferior petrosectomy (IP), and the inferomedial petrosectomy (IMP) techniques. Participants Six cadaver heads (12 sides, total) were dissected; each technique was performed on four sides. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes included the area of exposure, visible distances, angles of attack, and bone resection volume. Results The IMP technique provided a greater area of exposure ( p < 0.01) and bone resection volume ( p < 0.01) when compared with the MP and IP techniques. The IMP technique had a longer working length of the abducens nerve (cranial nerve [CN] VI) than the MP technique ( p < 0.01). The IMP technique demonstrated higher angles of attack to specific neurovascular structures when compared with the MP (midpons [ p = 0.04], anterior inferior cerebellar artery [ p < 0.01], proximal part of the cisternal CN VI segment [ p = 0.02]) and IP (flocculus [ p = 0.02] and the proximal [ p = 0.02] and distal parts [ p = 0.02] of the CN VII/VIII complex) techniques. Conclusion Each of these approaches offers varying degrees of access to the petroclival region, and the surgical approach should be appropriately tailored to the pathology. Overall, the IMP technique provides greater EEA surgical exposure to vital neurovascular structures than the MP and the IP techniques.

Quantitative Anatomic Comparison of the Extreme Lateral Transodontoid vs Extreme Medial Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches to the Jugular Foramen and Craniovertebral Junction.

BACKGROUND: Large, destructive intracranial and extracranial lesions at the jugular foramen (JF) and anterior craniovertebral junction (CVJ) are among the most challenging lesions to resect. OBJECTIVE: To compare the extreme lateral transodontoid approach (ELTOA) with the extreme medial endoscopic endonasal approach (EMEEA) to determine the most effective surgical approach to the JF and CVJ. METHODS: Seven formalin-fixed cadaveric heads were dissected. Using neuronavigation, we quantitatively measured and compared the exposure of the intracranial and extracranial neurovascular structures, the drilled area of the clivus and the C1 vertebra, and the area of exposure of the brainstem. RESULTS: The mean total drilled area of the clivus was greater with the EMEEA than with the ELTOA (1043.5 vs 909.4 mm 2 , P = .02). The EMEEA provided a longer exposure of the extracranial cranial nerves (CNs) IX, X, and XI compared with the ELTOA (cranial nerve [CN] IX: 18.8 vs 12.0 mm, P = .01; CN X: 19.2 vs 10.4 mm, P = .003; and CN XI, 18.1 vs 11.9 mm, P = .04). The EMEEA, compared with the ELTOA, provided a significantly greater area of exposure of the contralateral ventromedial medulla (289.5 vs 80.9 mm 2 , P < .001) and pons (237.5 vs 86.2 mm 2 , P = .005) but less area of exposure of the ipsilateral dorsolateral medulla (51.5 vs 205.8 mm 2 , P = .008). CONCLUSION: The EMEEA and ELTOA provide optimal exposures to different aspects of the CVJ and JF. A combination of these approaches can compensate for their disadvantages and achieve significant exposure.

Multiple hippocampal transection for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Multiple hippocampal transection (MHT) is a surgical technique that offers adequate seizure control with minimal perioperative morbidity. However, there is little evidence available to guide neurosurgeons in selecting this technique for use in appropriate patients. This systematic review analyzes patient-level data associated with MHT for intractable epilepsy, focusing on postoperative seizure control and memory outcomes. METHODS: The systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant articles were identified from 3 databases (PubMed, Medline, Embase) up to August 1, 2021. Inclusion criteria were that the majority of patients had received a diagnosis of intractable epilepsy, the article was written in English, MHT was the primary procedure, and patient-level metadata were included. RESULTS: Fifty-nine unique patients who underwent MHT were identified across 11 studies. Ten (17%) of 59 patients underwent MHT alone. Forty-three (75%) of 57 patients who had a follow-up 12 months or longer were seizure free at last follow-up. With respect to postoperative verbal memory retention, 9 of 38 (24%) patient test scores did not change, 14 (37%) decreased, and 16 (42%) increased. With respect to postoperative nonverbal memory retention, 12 of 38 (34%) patient test scores did not change, 13 (34%) decreased, and 13 (33%) increased. CONCLUSION: There are few reported patients analyzed after MHT. Although the neurocognitive benefits of MHT are unproven, this relatively novel technique has shown promise in the management of seizures in patients with intractable epilepsy. However, structured trials assessing MHT in isolation are warranted.

Surgical Anatomy of the Middle Communicating Artery and Guidelines for Predicting the Feasibility of M2-M2 End-to-End Reimplantation.

BACKGROUND: M2-M2 end-to-end reimplantation that creates a middle communicating artery has recently been proposed as a reconstruction technique to treat complex aneurysms of the middle cerebral artery that are not amenable to clipping. OBJECTIVE: To examine the surgical anatomy, define anatomic variables, and explore the feasibility of this bypass. METHODS: Sixteen cadaver heads were prepared for bypass simulation. After the middle cerebral artery bifurcation was approached, the proximal insular (M2) segments and perforators were explored. To define the maximal distance between the M2 segments that allows the bypass to be performed, the M2 segments were mobilized and reimplanted in an end-to-end fashion. RESULTS: Successful reimplantation was performed in all specimens. The mean maximal distance between the M2 segments to create the proposed reimplantation was 9.1 ± 3.2 mm. The mean vessel displacement was significantly greater for the superior (6.0 ± 2.3 mm) M2 segment than for the inferior (3.2 ± 1.4 mm) M2 segment (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this cadaveric study, the stumps of the M2 segments located at a distance of ≤9.1 mm could be approximated to create a feasible M2-M2 end-to-end anastomosis. Intraoperative inspection of the M2 segments and their perforators could allow further assessment of the feasibility of the procedure before final revascularization decisions are made.

Extradural anterior clinoidectomy versus endoscopic transplanum-transcavernous approach to the paraclinoid region: quantitative anatomical exposure analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcranial anterior clinoidectomy is a conventional microsurgical approach for treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is an alternative method for clipping intracranial aneurysms. No analysis has been conducted to anatomically compare approaches with respect to treating paraclinoid aneurysms. The surgical anatomical exposures of the paraclinoid region during transcranial extradural anterior clinoidectomy (EAC) and the endoscopic endonasal transplanum-cavernous approach (EETC) are described and quantitatively assessed. METHOD: Seven cadaveric heads underwent EAC and EETC. Measurements included the area of exposure, volume of surgical freedom, angle of attack, ophthalmic artery (OphA) origin, and coronal exposure angle of the internal carotid artery (ICA). RESULTS: The EETC provided a larger area of exposure than the EAC (100.1±24.9 vs 76.1±12.9 mm2, p = 0.04). The EAC provided a higher volume of surgical freedom and greater angle of attack than the EETC in all neurovascular parameters, including the OphA, superior hypophyseal artery (SHA), distal ICA, and distal dural ring (all p < 0.001). The OphA origin was intradural in 85.7% and extradural in 14.3% of specimens. With regard to the coronal angle of exposure, the EAC exposed the OphA and SHA in the upper lateral quadrant (67.9±7.8° and 80.6±4.5°, respectively) and the distal ICA in the upper medial and upper lateral quadrants (92±7.5°). The EEA exposed the OphA, SHA, and distal ICA in the upper medial and lower medial quadrants (130.4±10.7°, 68.4±10.8°, and 58±11.4°, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The EAC and EETC each offer specific advantages for paraclinoid region exposure. The EAC is appropriate for paraclinoid aneurysms that occur at the dorsolateral surface of the paraclinoid ICA. The EETC is an alternative approach for aneurysms that occur along medial surface of the paraclinoid ICA (e.g., carotid cave and SHA aneurysms). The EETC provides greater surgical exposure to the medial aspect of the paraclinoid ICA.

Comparison of Anatomic Exposure After Petrosectomy Using Anterior Transpetrosal and Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches: Experimental Cadaveric Study.

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial anterior petrosectomy (AP) is a classic approach; however, it is associated with adverse consequences. The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been developed as an alternative. We describe surgical techniques for AP and EEA and compare the anatomic exposures of each. METHODS: Ten cadaveric heads (20 sides) were dissected. Specimens were divided into 4 groups: 1) AP, 2) EEA for medial petrosectomy (MP), 3) EEA for inferior petrosectomy (IP), and 4) EEA for inferomedial petrosectomy (IMP). Outcomes were areas of exposure, angles of attack to neurovascular structures, and bone resection volumes. RESULTS: AP had a greater area of exposure than did MP and IP (P = 0.30, P < 0.01) and had a higher angle of attack to the distal part of the facial nerve-vestibulocochlear nerve (cranial nerve [CN] VII/VIII) complex than did IP and IMP (P < 0.01). MP had a lower angle of attack than IMP to the midpons (P = 0.04) and to the anterior inferior cerebellar artery (P < 0.01). Compared with IMP, IP had a lower angle of attack to the proximal part of the CN VII/VIII complex (P < 0.01) and the flocculus (P < 0.01). The bone resection volume in AP was significantly less than that in MP, IP, and IMP (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: AP and all EEA techniques had specific advantages for each specific area. We suggest AP for the ventrolateral pons and the anterior superior internal auditory canal, MP for the midline clivus, IP for the ventrolateral brainstem, and IMP to enhance the lateral corridor of the abducens nerve.

Comparative Anatomical Assessment of Full vs Limited Transcavernous Exposure of the Carotid-Oculomotor Window.

BACKGROUND: Although the full transcavernous approach affords extensive mobilization of the oculomotor nerve (OMN) for exposure of the basilar apex and interpeduncular cistern region, this time-consuming procedure requires substantial dural dissection along the anterior middle cranial fossa. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the extent to which limited middle fossa dural elevation affects the carotid-oculomotor window (C-OMW) surgical area during transcavernous exposure after OMN mobilization. METHODS: Four cadaveric specimens were dissected bilaterally to study the C-OMW area afforded by the transcavernous exposure. Each specimen underwent full and limited transcavernous exposure and anterior clinoidectomy (1 procedure per side; 8 procedures). Limited exposure was defined as a dural elevation confined to the cavernous sinus. Full exposure included dural elevation over the gasserian ganglion, extending to the middle meningeal artery and lateral middle cranial fossa. RESULTS: The C-OMW area achieved with the limited transcavernous exposure, compared with full transcavernous exposure, provided significantly less total area with OMN mobilization (22 ± 6 mm2 vs 52 ± 26 mm2, P = .03) and a smaller relative increase in area after OMN mobilization (11 ± 5 mm2 vs 36 ± 13 mm2, P = .03). The increase after OMN mobilization in the C-OMW area after OMN mobilization was 136% ± 119% with a limited exposure vs 334% ± 216% with a full exposure. CONCLUSION: In this anatomical study, the full transcavernous exposure significantly improved OMN mobilization and C-OMW area compared with a limited transcavernous exposure. If a transcavernous exposure is pursued, the difference in the carotid-oculomotor operative corridor area achieved with a limited vs full exposure should be considered.

Volumetric 3-Dimensional Analysis of the Supraorbital vs Pterional Approach to Paramedian Vascular Structures: Comprehensive Assessment of Surgical Maneuverability.

BACKGROUND: Both the pterional and supraorbital approaches have been proposed as optimal access corridors to deep and paramedian anatomy. OBJECTIVE: To assess key intracranial structures accessed through the surgical approaches using the angle of attack (AOA) and the volume of surgical freedom (VSF) methodologies. METHODS: Ten pterional and 10 supraorbital craniotomies were completed. Data points were measured using a neuronavigation system. A comparative analysis of the craniocaudal AOA, mediolateral AOA, and VSF of the ipsilateral paraclinoid internal carotid artery (ICA), terminal ICA, and anterior communicating artery (ACoA) complex was completed. RESULTS: For the paraclinoid ICA, the pterional approach produced larger craniocaudal AOA, mediolateral AOA, and VSF than the supraorbital approach (28.06° vs 10.52°, 33.76° vs 23.95°, and 68.73 vs 22.59 mm3 normalized unit [NU], respectively; P < .001). The terminal ICA showed similar superiority of the pterional approach in all quantitative parameters (27.43° vs 11.65°, 30.62° vs 25.31°, and 57.41 vs 17.36 mm3 NU; P < .05). For the ACoA, there were statistically significant differences between the results obtained using the pterional and supraorbital approaches (18.45° vs 10.11°, 29.68° vs 21.01°, and 26.81 vs 16.53 mm3 NU; P < .005). CONCLUSION: The pterional craniotomy was significantly superior in all instrument maneuverability parameters for approaching the ipsilateral paraclinoid ICA, terminal ICA, and ACoA. This global evaluation of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional surgical freedom and instrument maneuverability by amalgamating the craniocaudal AOA, mediolateral AOA, and VSF produces a comprehensive assessment while generating spatially and anatomically accurate corridor models that provide improved visual depiction for preoperative planning and surgical decision-making.

Novel System of Simulation Models for Aneurysm Clipping Training: Description of Models and Assessment of Face, Content, and Construct Validity.

BACKGROUND: Aneurysm clipping simulation models are needed to provide tactile feedback of biological vessels in a nonhazardous but surgically relevant environment. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel system of simulation models for aneurysm clipping training and assess its validity. METHODS: Craniotomy models were fabricated to mimic actual tissues and movement restrictions experienced during actual surgery. Turkey wing vessels were used to create aneurysm models with patient-specific geometry. Three simulation models (middle cerebral artery aneurysm clipping via a pterional approach, anterior cerebral artery aneurysm clipping via an interhemispheric approach, and basilar artery aneurysm clipping via an orbitozygomatic pretemporal approach) were subjected to face, content, and construct validity assessments by experienced neurosurgeons (n = 8) and neurosurgery trainees (n = 8). RESULTS: Most participants scored the model as replicating actual aneurysm clipping well and scored the difficulty of clipping as being comparable to that of real surgery, confirming face validity. Most participants responded that the model could improve clip-applier-handling skills when working with patients, which confirms content validity. Experienced neurosurgeons performed significantly better than trainees on all 3 models based on subjective (P = .003) and objective (P < .01) ratings and on time to complete the task (P = .04), which confirms construct validity. Simulations were used to discuss clip application strategies and compare them to prototype clinical cases. CONCLUSION: This novel aneurysm clipping model can be used safely outside the wet laboratory; it has high face, content, and construct validity; and it can be an effective training tool for microneurosurgery training during aneurysm surgery courses.