Increasing the impact of health plan report cards by addressing consumers' concerns.

Most plan report cards that compare the performance of health plans have framed the decision about plan choice as an opportunity to get better-quality care. This study uses a controlled experimental design to examine the effect of reframing the health plan choice decision to one that emphasizes protecting oneself from possible risk. The findings show that framing the health plan decision using a risk message has a consistent and significant positive impact on how consumers comprehend, value, and weight comparative performance information.

What do consumers want and need to know in making health care choices?

This article assesses the presumption that consumer choice in health care is based on a rational weighing of alternatives--that information consumers about plan or provider performance, when coupled with information on cost plus service scope and limitation, will lead consumers to select high-quality, low-priced plans or providers. The authors review research on what health care consumers know, what they want to know, and what others think they should know. They also consider how people use information in making decisions and what this implies for what consumers really need to know to make effective decisions. The article concludes that assuming a rational consumer does not account for choice among options in the increasingly complex health care context facing consumers today. Based on this review, the article identifies gaps in the knowledge and sketches out a prospective research agenda in the area of consumer health care decision making.

Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

OBJECTIVES: Consumer surveys are being used increasingly to assess the quality of care provided by health plans, physician groups, and clinicians. The purpose of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) is to develop an integrated and standardized set of surveys designed to collect reliable and valid information about health plan performance from consumers. This article reports psychometric results for the CAHPS 1.0 survey items in samples of individuals with Medicaid or private health insurance coverage. METHODS: Reliability estimates for CAHPS 1.0 measures were estimated in a sample of 5,878 persons on Medicaid and 11,393 persons with private health insurance. Correlations of the CAHPS global rating of the health plan with willingness to recommend the plan and intention to re-enroll were estimated in a sample of 313 persons on Medicaid. The association of the rating of the health plan with ratings using a 5-point Excellent-to-Poor response scale also was investigated in the latter sample and in a sample of 539 persons with private health insurance. RESULTS: The CAHPS measures appeared to have good reliability, particularly at the health-plan level. Responses from 300 consumers per health plan tend to yield estimates that are reliable enough for health plan comparisons, especially among the privately insured. The global health plan rating was significantly correlated with consumers' willingness to recommend the plan to family and friends and to their intention to re-enroll in the plan if given a choice. CONCLUSIONS: The CAHPS 1.0 survey instrument appears to have excellent psychometric properties.

Special issues addressed in the CAHPS survey of Medicare managed care beneficiaries. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.

OBJECTIVES: This article describes the process through which the MMC survey was developed and examines issues in using this survey with Medicare beneficiaries that have implications for all CAHPS surveys. These include the ability of Medicare beneficiaries to use MMC navigational features, whether access measures are meaningful for this population, and whether beneficiaries' familiarity with managed care influences their health plan assessments. BACKGROUND: The Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) is mandated to provide comparative plan information, based partly on consumer surveys, to Medicare beneficiaries. The Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) is an integrated set of tested, standardized surveys of health plan enrollees. To meet its goal, HCFA has invested in the development of a CAHPS survey of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Managed Care plans (MMC). METHODS: Cognitive interviews were completed with 31 Medicare beneficiaries. A field test also was conducted with beneficiaries to examine patterns of survey response. A sample of 956 eligible individuals was selected from six health plans. Using a combination of mail and telephone data collection, 663 (69%) questionnaires were completed. This article provides selective results from these tests. RESULTS: The use of screening questions, skip instructions, and tailored "not applicable" response options appeared to facilitate the response task. Some CAHPS access questions were not meaningful to Medicare beneficiaries. The data do not support the need to adjust for length of plan enrollment. CONCLUSION: Analyses suggested changes to improve the MMC survey and to make other CAHPS surveys consistent with these changes.