Effects of Non-Ablative Solid-State Vaginal Laser (SSVL) for the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Atrophy in Breast Cancer Survivors after Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: Preliminary Results.

BACKGROUND: One of the side effects of anti-estrogen treatments in breast cancer survivors (BCSs), especially with aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment, is the frequent appearance of vulvo-vaginal atrophy (VVA). We aim to evaluate the efficacy, safety and feasibility of a new type of non-ablative Solid-State Vaginal Laser (SSVL) treatment in BCSs with VVA. METHODS: A total of 30 BCSs with a history of AI use and symptoms of VVA were treated with a non-ablative SSVL (LASEmaR 1500™-EUFOTON)in this non-randomized pilot study. The effects of the laser have been evaluated at baseline, 10 wk and 24 wk using a visual analogue scale (VAS), the Vaginal Health Index (VHI), the Vulvar Health Index (VuHI), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the EORTC QLQ-BR23, the Vaginal Maturation Index (VMI) and vaginal pH. RESULTS: At 10-week follow-up vs. baseline there were no statistically significant differences in FSFI, lubrication and EORTC QLQ-BR23. In all the subjective (dyspareunia, VHI, VuHI, FSFI, QLQ) and objective parameters (VMI and pH) there was a statistically significant improvement at the 6-month follow-up. Satisfaction was very high (4.7 out of 5), with 95.7% of patients being satisfied, more than or very satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results of SSVL treatment of VVA and dyspareunia in BCSs after AI treatment suggest clinical improvement, without relevant side effects and with a high degree of satisfaction.

AEEM-SEGO position statement on menopausal hormone therapy / Posicionamiento AEEM-SEGO sobre la terapia hormonal de la menopausia

According to the latest data from the medical literature, the Spanish Menopause Society (Asociación Española para el Estudio de la Menopausia [AEEM]) has brought together a group of experts to re-evaluate the use of menopausal hormone therapy so that women can make an informed, evidence-based decision to determine the most appropriate dose, formulation, route of administration, and duration of menopausal hormone therapy. There is some disagreement between scientific evidence on the efficacy and safety of menopausal hormone therapy and how this evidence is perceived by menopausal women and the clinicians who care for them, leading to an unnecessary loss of quality of life in those who reject it or in the unjustified fear of those who choose to use it. A critical review of the most recent available literature was conducted. The review mainly covered randomized clinical trials and epidemiological studies published since January 2015. This paper reviews clinical trials published since then, as well as new information on the potential risks and benefits of HT for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. Decisions about menopausal hormone therapy should be based on a woman’s specific health risks, age, and time since onset of the menopause, as well as on the goals of therapy. The Spanish Menopause Society (Asociación Española para el Estudio de la Menopausia) and the Spanish Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia) updated their position statement on menopausal hormone therapy. This statement updates the clinical practice guidelines on the menopause

Conocidos los últimos datos de la literatura médica, la Asociación Española para el Estudio de la Menopausia ha reunido a un grupobde expertos para reevaluar el uso de la terapia hormonal de la menopausia con el fin de adoptar una decisión informada, basada en la evidencia que determina el tipo más apropiado de dosis, formulación, vía de administración y duración del uso de la terapia hormonal de la menopausia. Existe una discordancia entre las evidencias de carácter científico, sobre la eficacia y la seguridad de la terapia hormonal de la menopausia y la percepción que tienen de ello las mujeres que están en la menopausia y los médicos que las atienden, lo que redunda en una pérdida innecesaria de la calidad de vida en las que lo rechazan o en el temor injustificado de las que optan por su utilización. Se ha realizado una revisión crítica de la literatura disponible más reciente, fundamentalmente de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados y estudios epidemiológicos, publicados desde enero de 2015. El presente documento revisa los nuevos ensayos clínicos publicados desde entonces, así como nueva información sobre los posibles riesgos y beneficios de la terapia hormonal de la menopausia para el tratamiento de los síntomas de la menopausia. Las decisiones sobre la terapia hormonal de la menopausia deben basarse en los riesgos de salud específicos de cada mujer, la edad o el tiempo desde la menopausia y los objetivos de la terapia. La Asociación Española para el Estudio de la Menopausia y la Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia actualizaron su posicionamiento con respecto a la terapia hormonal de la menopausia. Dicho posicionamiento de la Asociación Española para el Estudio de la Menopausia/Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia actualiza las guías de práctica clínica de menopausia ya publicadas

Endometrial polyps in obese asymptomatic pre and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer: is screening necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of endometrial polyps in obese asymptomatic pre and postmenopausal patients with breast cancer and to know if a baseline pretamoxifen endometrial assessment should be taken into consideration in these women at high risk. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out with 201 women with breast cancer. A diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed in all women. All formations suspected as polyps were removed. The prevalence of endometrial polyps was analyzed in all patients (n=182) and in premenopausal (n=49) and postmenopausal (n=118) women with estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC) according to their body mass index (BMI) and other risk factors. RESULTS: Hysteroscopic evaluation was possible in 182 cases (90.5%). Of the total of women, 160 (87.9%) were ER(+)BC patients, 133 (73.1%) postmenopausal women and 41.5% were obese (BMI≥30kg/m(2)). Endometrial polyps were found in 52 cases (28.5%) (3 cases of simple hyperplasia harbored within a polyp). In premenopausal patients with ER(+)BC, there were no statistical differences in endometrial polyps according to their BMI (22.3% in non-obese women vs 31.7% in obese) while in all patients (26.4% in non-obese vs 44.0% in obese) and in postmenopausal women with ER(+)BC (25.9% in non-obese vs 48.6% in obese) there were statistical differences. In all women the relative risk (RR) of endometrial polyps in obese patients was 2.24 (1.01-4.83), in obese postmenopausal women with ER(+)BC was 2.75 (1.01-7.40) and in obese premenopausal patients with ER(+)BC was 1.42 (0.80-3.29). CONCLUSIONS: Asymptomatic women with breast cancer have a high prevalence of baseline subclinical endometrial polyps and it is very high in obese postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Therefore, there may be a future role for baseline pretamoxifen screening of some sort for the obese asymptomatic postmenopausal patient, especially if they are elderly and ER positive.