International evidence-based guidelines on Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for critically ill neonates and children issued by the POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC)

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is nowadays an essential tool in critical care. Its role seems more important in neonates and children where other monitoring techniques may be unavailable. POCUS Working Group of the European Society of Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) aimed to provide evidence-based clinical guidelines for the use of POCUS in critically ill neonates and children. Creation of an international Euro-American panel of paediatric and neonatal intensivists expert in POCUS and systematic review of relevant literature. A literature search was performed, and the level of evidence was assessed according to a GRADE method. Recommendations were developed through discussions managed following a Quaker-based consensus technique and evaluating appropriateness using a modified blind RAND/UCLAvoting method. AGREE statement was followed to prepare this document. Panellists agreed on 39 out of 41 recommendations for the use of cardiac, lung, vascular, cerebral and abdominal POCUS in critically ill neonates and children. Recommendations were mostly (28 out of 39) based on moderate quality of evidence (B and C). Evidence-based guidelines for the use of POCUS in critically ill neonates and children are now available. They will be useful to optimise the use of POCUS, training programs and further research, which are urgently needed given the weak quality of evidence available.

Surfactant inadvertent loss using feeding catheters or endotracheal tubes.

OBJECTIVE: Surfactant has been administered through endotracheal tubes and also under spontaneous breathing using feeding catheters. We asked if different tube diameters and temperature may affect the amount of surfactant effectively delivered to the lungs. DESIGN: Bench study using high-accuracy, legal balance and tube/catheters of different diameters. We injected 200 mg of poractant alfa into the tubes followed by air boluses. Experiments were performed in triplicate, both at room temperature and at 37°C. Surfactant and phospholipid remaining in the tube were calculated. RESULTS: Surfactant lost into thin catheters (11 ± 0.4%) was more than that in endotracheal tubes (2-mm diameter: 3.6 ± 1.4%; 2.5-mm diameter: 3.7 ± 0.2%; 3-mm diameter: 5.2 ± 0.4%; p < 0.001 at post hoc test in each comparison against the thin catheter). Similar findings were found at 37°C (2-mm tube: 3.4 ± 0.4%; 2.5-mm tube: 3.8 ± 0.2%; 3-mm tube: 3.6 ± 0.4%; feeding tube: 11.5 ± 0.6%; p < 0.001 as above). In terms of lost phospholipids, 23 ± 0.8 mg were lost in the feeding tubes; 7.2 ± 2.9 mg (2-mm diameter), 7.4 ± 0.4 mg (2.5-mm diameter), and 10.3 ± 0.9 mg (3-mm diameter) of phospholipids remained in endotracheal tubes (p < 0.001 in each comparison against the feeding tube). CONCLUSIONS: Surfactant loss using thin catheters is around two to three times higher than using common endotracheal tubes; on average, 20 mg of phospholipids (11% of the administered dose) are lost. These data may be useful to refine surfactant dosing.