Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Blocks (SPIB) With Buprenorphine, Magnesium, and Bupivacaine for Management of Pain in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Introduction Management of post-operative pain after cardiac surgery continues to be a challenge; inadequate management of pain can lead to increased morbidity, impaired physical function with potential delay in recovery, increased perioperative and chronic opioid consumption, increased cost of care, and a decreased quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding buprenorphine and magnesium to bupivacaine for superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks (SPIB) on pain and opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods Patients undergoing CABG were divided into the following four groups: saline SPIB, SPIB with bupivacaine (BPVC), SPIB with bupivacaine and buprenorphine (BPVC+BPRN), and SPIB with bupivacaine, buprenorphine, and magnesium (BPVC+BPRN+MG). The primary outcomes were pain scores and opioid consumption after SPIB; the secondary outcomes were post-operative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, and length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit and hospital. Results One hundred thirty-four eligible patients undergoing CABG were randomized to either the saline (n=27), BPVC (n=20), BPVC+BPRN (n=24), or BPVC+BPRN+MG (n=29) group. All of the intervention groups combined (BPVC, BPVC+BPRN, and BPVC+BPRN+MG) had decreased pain scores and decreased opioid consumption when compared to the saline group; although not statistically significant, visual analog scale (VAS) scores trended downward at most time points with BPVC versus saline, BPVC+BPRN versus BPVC, and BPVC+BPRN+MG versus BPVC+BPRN. There was no difference among the study groups in the incidence of post-operative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV), time to extubation, hospital LOS, and ICU LOS. Conclusion In this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we found that SPIB with local anesthetic is effective at reducing VAS scores and opioid consumption after CABG. Further study is needed to determine whether the addition of adjuvants can further improve pain control and opioid consumption.

Fibrosing Mediastinitis Presenting With Superior Vena Cava Syndrome.

Fibrosing mediastinitis (FM) is an uncommon diagnosis that involves the proliferation of extensive, dense fibrous tissue in the mediastinum. FM accounts for less than 1% of people with prior infection by Histoplasma capsulatum that develop hypersensitivity immune responses to antigens released during the initial exposure. Other causes include tuberculosis, blastomycosis, sarcoidosis, radiation, and idiopathic.  We describe FM presenting with superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome. A 66-year-old Caucasian male presented with a one-week history of progressively worsening facial swelling associated with dysphonia, bilateral ptosis, dyspnea on exertion, and unintentional weight loss of 30 pounds within the past three months. He had a 40-pack-year smoking history and a past medical history of essential hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis. The CT chest demonstrated non-specific soft tissue extending throughout the mediastinum and towards the right hilar region, complicated by severe attenuation of the superior vena cava and a 2.4 cm × 1.6 cm necrotic lymph node. The mediastinum had hyperemic and desmoplastic changes heavily encased in venous collaterals. L4 lymph node pathological evaluation demonstrated sinus histiocytosis and reactive lymphoid hyperplasia without signs of malignancy or atypia. The patient was treated with corticosteroid and diuretic therapy to achieve intermittent symptomatic relief, but continued to decline clinically, ultimately leading to his demise. The diagnosis of FM is best obtained through CT chest with intravenous contrast to demonstrate abnormal mediastinal tissue and possible structural compromise. A biopsy of the mediastinal tissue may also help rule out malignancy. Only a few case reports have demonstrated mixed symptomatic and radiologic responses to anti-inflammatory and/or antifungal treatment. Even non-surgical and surgical interventions have shown inconsistent efficacy, with frequent restenosis warranting re-exploration.

Comparing the Mutual Interchangeability of ECOM, FloTrac/Vigileo, 3D-TEE, and ITD-PAC Cardiac Output Measuring Systems in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the mutual interchangeability of 4 cardiac output measuring devices by comparing their accuracy, precision, and trending ability. DESIGN: A single-center prospective observational study. DESIGN: Nonuniversity teaching hospital, single center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-four consecutive patients scheduled for elective, nonemergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). INTERVENTIONS: The cardiac output was measured for each participant using 4 methods: intermittent thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter (ITD-PAC), Endotracheal Cardiac Output Monitor (ECOM), FloTrac/Vigileo System (FLOTRAC), and 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D-TEE). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Measurements were performed simultaneously at 5 time points: presternotomy, poststernotomy, before cardiopulmonary bypass, after cardiopulmonary bypass, and after sternal closure. A series of statistical and comparison analyses including ANOVA, Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plots, quadrant plots, and polar plots were performed, and inherent precision for each method and percent errors for mutual interchangeability were calculated. For the 6 two-by-two comparisons of the methods, the Pearson correlation coefficients (r), the percentage errors (% error), and concordance ratios (CR) were as follows: ECOM_versus_ITD-PAC (r = 0.611, % error = 53%, CR = 75%); FLOTRAC_versus_ITD-PAC (r = 0.676, % error = 49%, CR = 77%); 3D-TEE versus ITD-PAC (r = 0.538, % error = 64%, CR = 67%); FLOTRAC_versus_ECOM (r = 0.627, % error = 51%, CR = 75%); 3D-TEE_versus ECOM (r = 0.423, % error = 70%, CR = 60%), and 3D-TEE_versus_FLOTRAC (r = 0.602, % error = 59%, CR = 61%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the recommended statistical measures of interchangeability, ECOM, FLOTRAC, and 3D-TEE are not interchangeable with each other or to the reference standard invasive ITD-PAC method in patients undergoing nonemergent cardiac bypass surgery. Despite the negative result in this study and the majority of previous studies, these less-invasive methods of CO have continued to be used in the hemodynamic management of patients. Each device has its own distinct technical features and inherent limitations; it is clear that no single device can be used universally for all patients. Therefore, different methods or devices should be chosen based on individual patient conditions, including the degree of invasiveness, measurement performance, and the ability to provide real-time, continuous CO readings.