Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vital Health Stat 10 ; (236): 1-104, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18624012

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This report presents both age-adjusted and unadjusted health statistics from the 2006 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States, classified by sex, age, race, Hispanic or Latino origin and race, education, family income, poverty status, health insurance coverage (where appropriate), place of residence, and region of residence. The topics covered are respondent-assessed health status, limitations in activities, special education or early intervention services, injury and poisoning episodes, health care access and utilization, and health insurance coverage. SOURCE OF DATA: NHIS is a household, multistage probability sample survey conducted annually by interviewers of the U.S. Census Bureau for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics. In 2006, household interviews were completed for 75,716 persons living in 29,204 households, reflecting a household response rate of 87.3%. SELECTED HIGHLIGHTS: Nearly 7 in 10 persons were in excellent or very good health in 2006. About 36 million persons (12%) were limited in their usual activities due to one or more chronic health conditions. About 4 million persons (2%) required the help of another person with activities of daily living, and about 8 million persons (4%) required the help of another person with instrumental activities of daily living. About 6% of children received special education or early intervention services. Among persons under age 65 years, about 43 million (17%) did not have any health insurance coverage. The most common reason for lacking health insurance was cost, followed by a change in employment.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Health Surveys , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Demography , Education, Special/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Poisoning/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology
2.
Adv Data ; (369): 1-19, 2006 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16541709

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This report presents national prevalence estimates of selected measures of physical health status and limitations, health care access and utilization, and mental health status among the civilian noninstitutionalized population of U.S.- and foreign-born adults aged 18 years and over in four race-ethnicity groups in the United States. METHODS: The estimates in this report were derived from the Family Core and Sample Adult components of the 1998-2003 National Health Interview Surveys, conducted annually by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Estimates were generated and comparisons conducted using the SUDAAN statistical package to account for the complex survey sample design. Data were age adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population. RESULTS: In general, the foreign-born population was younger, less likely to have a high school diploma, more likely to be poor, heavily concentrated in the central cities of metropolitan areas, and more likely to live in large families, compared with their U.S.-born counterparts. Hispanic immigrants were the least likely to have health insurance or to have a usual source of health care compared with other immigrant groups. Non-Hispanic black and Hispanic adults, regardless of nativity, were more likely to be obese than non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic Asian adults. However, non-Hispanic black and Hispanic immigrant adults were significantly less likely to be obese than their U.S.-born counterparts. Hispanic immigrants were more likely to be obese the longer they lived in the United States. Foreign-born nonHispanic black and Hispanic immigrant adults experienced fewer symptoms of serious psychological distress compared with their U.S.-born counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in physical health status and mental health status among U.S.-born and foreign-born adults. Foreign-born adults enjoy considerable advantages over their U.S.-born counterparts for many health measures despite limited access to health care and unfavorable sociodemographic characteristics. Differences in the impact of length of stay in the United States on immigrant health suggest that the role of acculturation in understanding immigrant health is complex and may differ for various race/ethnicity groups.


Subject(s)
Asian/statistics & numerical data , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Indicators , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Emigration and Immigration/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...