The role of supraglottic airway devices for caesarean section under general anaesthesia. A scoping literature review with a proposed algorithm for the appropriate use of supraglottic airway devices for caesarean sections.

This review aims to assess the published evidence on airway management with a supraglottic airway device (SGA) for general anaesthesia in patients requiring a caesarean section. Physiological changes during pregnancy can make airway management in parturients challenging. At the same time, pregnant patients are at risk of pulmonary aspiration due to hormonal and mechanical alterations. The standard airway management for parturients undergoing caesarean section is rapid sequence induction followed by tracheal intubation. Evidence exists that using second-generation SGA devices is well tolerated and effective in selected patients. In this review, we provide an overview of the existing evidence and provide an algorithm to make an evidence-based clinical decision on the use of SGA devices. An online literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, PubMed, Emcare, Cochrane Library and CINAHL. The search terms used were 'supraglottic airway', 'supraglottic airway device', 'supraglottic airway management', 'supraglottic tube', 'i-gel', laryngeal mask', 'laryngeal mask airway', 'LMA', 'SGA', 'Proseal', 'Supreme', 'obstetric surgery', 'obstetric operation', 'general anaesthesia', 'caesarean' or 'caesarean section', 'abdominal delivery'. Full-text articles in English, Dutch and French were included. Case reports and studies in which the surgery was not a caesarean section were excluded. The initial search yielded 815 results. Following screening, deduplication and removal of publications that were unrelated to the topic or did not fit the inclusion criteria, 13 manuscripts were included in our analysis. A total of 7722 patients were described in the articles included. In the majority of manuscripts, second-generation SGA devices were used. There were seven cases of failed insertion and a need for conversion to tracheal intubation; first-generation SGA devices were used in these cases. There were no cases of pulmonary aspiration, and only one case of gastric regurgitation was described. Growing evidence suggests that the use of second-generation SGA devices might be well tolerated as the primary method for securing the airway for caesarean sections requiring general anaesthesia, in selected patients with a low risk for aspiration and difficult intubation.

Obstetric units' preparedness to manage critically ill women. The second report from the MaCriCare study.

PURPOSE: We aimed to describe the availability of 31 distinct services and facilities to diagnose, resuscitate, and treat critically unwell obstetric patients. METHODS: Using a network of anesthesiologists, intensive care clinicians, obstetricians, critical care nurses, and midwives (MaCriCare) from September 2021 to January 2022, we conducted a descriptive international multicenter cross-sectional survey in centers with obstetric units (OUs) in the WHO Europe Region. RESULTS: The MaCriCare network covers 26 countries and received 1133 responses, corresponding to 2.5 million annual deliveries. The survey identified significant disparities in the availability of the measured 31 services among the OUs, with some services not immediately available and some not available at all. Point-of-care hemoglobin measurements were lacking in 13.8% of OUs. 15.2% of OUs lacked pointof-care lactate measurement, and 11% lacked transfusion services. 23.8% of OUs lacked the ability to administer hypotensive agent infusions in the labor ward. Samebuilding access to cell saver and thromboelastometry was unavailable to 45.5% and 64.4% of OUs, respectively. Access to invasive ventilation was unavailable to 3.4% of OUs, 11.7% were unable to offer same-building access to non-invasive ventilation, and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation was unavailable to 38.3% of the OUs. CONCLUSION: Critically ill obstetric patients have access to markedly different resources in the WHO Europe Region depending on the OU where they are managed. Consensus on which facilities and services should be universally available is urgently needed.

Preparedness for severe maternal morbidity in European hospitals: The MaCriCare study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate obstetric units (OUs) and intensive care units (ICUs) preparedness for severe maternal morbidity (SMM). METHODS: From September 2021 to January 2022, an international multicentre cross-sectional study surveyed OUs in 26 WHO Europe Region countries. We assessed modified early obstetric warning score usage (MEOWS), approaches to four SMM clinical scenarios, invasive monitoring availability in OUs, and access to high-dependency units (HDUs) and onsite ICUs. Within ICUs, we examined the availability of trained staff, response to obstetric emergencies, leadership, and data collection. RESULTS: 1133 responses were evaluated. MEOWS use was 34.5%. Non-obstetric early warning scores were being used. 21.4% (242) of OUs provided invasive monitoring in the OU. A quarter lacked access to onsite HDU beds. In cases of SMM, up to 13.8% of all OUs indicated the need for transfer to another hospital. The transfer rate was highest (74.0%) in small units. 81.9% of centers provided onsite ICU facilities to obstetric patients. Over 90% of the onsite ICUs provided daily specialist obstetric reviews but lacked immediate access to key resources: 3.4% - uterotonic drugs, 7.5% - neonatal resuscitation equipment, 9.2% - neonatal resuscitation team, 11.4% - perimortem cesarean section equipment. 41.2% reported obstetric data to a national database. CONCLUSION: Gaps in provision exist for obstetric patients with SMM in Europe, potentially compromising patient safety and experience. MEOWS use in OUs was low, while access to invasive monitoring and onsite HDU and ICU facilities was variable. ICUs frequently lacked resources and did not universally collect obstetric data for quality control.

Diagnosis and management of covid-19 in pregnancy.

Pregnant women with covid-19 are at greater risk of severe disease than their non-pregnant peers, and yet they are frequently denied investigations or treatments because of unfounded concerns about risk to the fetus. The basic principles of diagnosing and managing covid-19 are the same as for non-pregnant patients, and a multidisciplinary, expert team approach is essential to ensure optimal care. During pregnancy, treatment with corticosteroids should be modified to use non-fluorinated glucocorticoids. Il-6 inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, together with specific antiviral therapies, may also be considered. Prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism is important. Women may require respiratory support with oxygen, non-invasive ventilation, ventilation in a prone position (either awake or during invasive ventilation), intubation and ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Pregnancy is not a contraindication for any of these supportive therapies, and the criteria for providing them are the same as in the general population. Decisions regarding timing, place, and mode of delivery should be taken with a multidisciplinary team including obstetricians, physicians, anesthetists, and intensivists experienced in the care of covid-19 in pregnancy. Ideally these decisions should take place in consultation with centers that have experience and expertise in all these specialties.

European minimum standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments: An experts' consensus.

: An important variability of anaesthetic standards of care was discovered in the obstetric departments of many European Union countries. After discussing this issue in various meetings of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) board and its obstetric subcommittee, European Board of Anaesthesiology of the European Union of Medical Specialists (EBA-UEMS) executive members, ESA obstetric subcommittee members and European experts in obstetric anaesthesiology have participated in the elaboration of this document. This experts' opinion is focused mainly on obstetric patients and safety concerns in terms of minimum standards of practice. An initial bibliographical search was performed in medical databases and general literature, searching for obstetric anaesthesiology standards to select the most important safety issues. After the initial presentation of the project during EBA-UEMS and ESA obstetric subcommittee meetings, participants were asked to review the document; several rounds of revisions were performed by the experts, to reach a common opinion concerning the topics considered central to patient safety in the obstetric setting. After three rounds of revision, a consensus was reached and is presented in this document, which includes the list of topics considered relevant by the involved areas, and the respective recommendations. These recommendations covered some EBA-UEMS strategic key areas, in addition to several clinical aspects of common obstetric practice.

Maternal morbidity: how to reduce it.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Internationally there has been increased interest in maternal morbidity; both as a strategy to reduce maternal deaths and also because of the significant impact on a woman's life as a result of suffering from maternal morbidity. The present review will evaluate the current knowledge of, and strategies to reduce maternal morbidity. RECENT FINDINGS: The study of maternal morbidity and how to reduce it has been hampered for many years by the lack of a standard approach to measurement and evaluation. The World Health Organization has attempted to standardize the approach to maternal morbidity with the development of a new definition that recognizes the multiple dimensions of maternal morbidity, including external factors such as socioeconomic factors. This approach will assist with a more accurate evaluation of maternal morbidity. Maternal morbidity arises from many and varied causes. Many of these are amenable to quality improvement with an associated reduction in maternal morbidity. SUMMARY: There have been significant advances in the understanding of maternal morbidity: incidence causes and management. Future research should aim to establish accurate rates for maternal morbidity and further develop ways for healthcare professionals, including anaesthesia care providers, to reduce it.

A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for pre-eclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia is a serious complication of pregnancy and contributes to maternal and offspring mortality and morbidity. Randomised controlled trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for pre-eclampsia have reported many different outcomes and outcome measures. Such variation contributes to an inability to compare, contrast, and combine individual studies, limiting the usefulness of research to inform clinical practice. The development and use of a core outcome set would help to address these issues ensuring outcomes important to all stakeholders, including patients, will be collected and reported in a standardised fashion. METHODS: An international steering group including healthcare professionals, researchers, and patients, has been formed to guide the development of this core outcome set. Potential outcomes will be identified through a comprehensive literature review and semi-structured interviews with patients. Potential core outcomes will be entered into an international, multi-perspective online Delphi survey. All key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, researchers, and patients will be invited to participate. The modified Delphi method encourages whole and stakeholder group convergence towards consensus 'core' outcomes. Once core outcomes have been agreed upon it is important to determine how they should be measured. The truth, discrimination, and feasibility assessment framework will assess the quality of potential outcome measures. High quality outcome measures will be associated with core outcomes. Mechanisms exist to disseminate and implement the resulting core outcome set within an international context. DISCUSSION: Embedding the core outcome set within future clinical trials, systematic reviews, and clinical practice guidelines could make a profound contribution to advancing the usefulness of research to inform clinical practice, enhance patient care, and improve maternal and offspring outcomes. The infrastructure created by developing a core outcome set for pre-eclampsia could be leveraged in other settings, for example selecting research priorities and clinical practice guideline development. PROSPECTIVE REGISTRATION: [1] Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) registration number: 588. [2] International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number: CRD42015015529.

Operative delivery rates following induction of labour for obstetric cholestasis.

The aim of this study was to determine whether women induced for obstetric cholestasis (OC) have increased rates of operative delivery compared with women without OC who are induced. This retrospective case-control study included 64 women with OC (singleton pregnancies), who had labour induced compared with two control groups (matched for parity and gestational week at delivery). The majority of women were induced at 37 weeks. We found no significant increase in the rate of operative or assisted delivery in OC cases compared with either control group. Women with OC who are induced between 36 and 40 weeks gestation do not have increased rates of assisted or operative delivery compared with induced controls.