Dry eye and cataract surgery: Narrative review and recommendations for management.

Cataract surgery is the most frequently performed surgical procedure in the elderly in Western countries and patients' expectations for postoperative outcomes are very high.Dry eye disease (DED) is a common multifactorial symptomatic disease of the ocular surface with a complex etiopathogenesis and a prevalence significantly increasing with age.Cataract surgery and DED have a complex relationship, which needs to be acknowledged, understood, and properly managed, as suggested by daily clinical experience and growing scientific evidence. The surgical procedure can have a relevant impact on the tear film and the ocular surface, and it can, usually transiently, induce or exacerbate DED symptoms. Moreover, preoperative DED can affect surgical refractive outcomes, while postoperative DED symptoms can significantly worsen patients reported outcomes and satisfaction.At the end of this narrative review summarizing the evidence on this topic, the "Dry Eye and Cataract Surgery" subcommittee of the DROPS workshop formulated some recommendations for ocular surface and DED management pre-, intra-, and post-cataract surgery.

Optical coherence tomography angiography application to pigmented iris: Could a new index quantify blood flow?

PURPOSE: To assess the blood flow and vascular visibility of irises in relation to pigmentation and pupil size, using an anterior segment optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. OCTA images were acquired in the nasal and temporal quadrants from a cohort of 30 healthy subjects in photopic (miosis) and scotopic (mydriasis) conditions. Patients were divided according to iris color (less pigmented: group L vs more pigmented: group D). Vascular parameters (vessel density (VD), vessel length density (VLD), fractal dimension (FD)) were applied and compared among groups L and D, location and different pupil status. A novel vascular index called Luminance Index (LI) was developed and applied in order to quantify vascular flow and evaluate its variation in photopic and scotopic conditions. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate possible predictors of VD and LI. RESULTS: No differences were found for all vascular measurements (VD, VDL, FD, LI) between nasal and temporal quadrants. All vascular measurements were higher in group L than in group D (p < 0.05), except for LI and FD in photopic condition. In group L, all vascular parameters increased (p < 0.001) after dark adaptation. In group D, only LI increased after dark adaptation (p < 0.001). Pigmentation and iris thickness were significantly associated with VD in scotopic and photopic conditions, and with LI only in scotopic condition. CONCLUSIONS: Pigmentation still remains a major issue for vascular visibility. Quantitative and qualitative vascular changes follow pupil size variation. LI could be a new surrogate to quantify blood flow.

Angle-supported intraocular lens versus scleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens in post-cataract surgery aphakic patients: two-year follow-up cost-effectiveness analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare visual, anatomical and economical outcomes of patients with secondary anterior chamber intraocular lens (AC-IOL) implantation and secondary scleral fixated intraocular lens (SF-IOL) implantation. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, 38 aphakic patients after complicated phacoemulsification divided in two groups, AC-IOL group (17 patients receiving AC-IOL implantation) and SF-IOL group (21 patients receiving SF-IOL implantation). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), patient reported visual outcome (VF-14) and endothelial cell density (ECD) were measured at baseline and two-year follow-up. Complication rate was registered. The global cost of each procedure and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in CDVA (logMAR 0.24 ± 0.17 vs. 0.32 ± 0.26, p = 0.27), VF-14 (68 ± 18 vs. 61 ± 20, p = 0.24), ECD (1456.48 ± 525.15 vs. 1341.71 ± 374.33, p = 0.48) and overall complication rate (p = 0.79) postoperatively between the SF-IOL group and the AC-IOL group. The ECD loss rate was significantly higher in the AC-IOL group (15.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.004). The average global cost of the two procedures was higher in the SF-IOL group (p < 0.005) and ICER showed an additional payment of 693 € for each patient in SF-IOL group against a saving of 186 endothelial cells 2 years postoperatively. CONCLUSION: AC IOL and SF-IOL implantation showed similar outcomes in terms of visual function and safety profile. Higher ECD loss was found in AC-IOL group. The global cost of implantation was significantly lower for AC-IOL, but the ICER seems to justify the SF-IOL implantation in patients with low ECD.