FRTX-02, a selective and potent inhibitor of DYRK1A, modulates inflammatory pathways in mouse models of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.

Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1 A (DYRK1A) has been proposed as a novel regulator of adaptive immune homeostasis through modulating T cell polarization. Thus, DYRK1A could present a potential target in autoimmune disorders. Here, we identify FRTX-02 as a novel compound exhibiting potent and selective inhibition of DYRK1A. FRTX-02 induced transcriptional activity of the DYRK1A substrate NFAT in T cell lines. Correspondingly, FRTX-02 promoted ex vivo CD4+ polarization into anti-inflammatory Tregs and reduced their polarization into pro-inflammatory Th1 or Th17 cells. We show that FRTX-02 could also limit innate immune responses through negative regulation of the MyD88/IRAK4-NF-κB axis in a mast cell line. Finally, in mouse models of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, both oral and topical formulations of FRTX-02 reduced inflammation and disease biomarkers in a dose-dependent manner. These results support further studies of DYRK1A inhibitors, including FRTX-02, as potential therapies for chronic inflammatory and autoimmune conditions.

MRI and Dose Selection in a Phase II Trial of Baricitinib with Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used in a phase IIb study of baricitinib in patients with RA to support dose selection for the phase III program. METHODS: Three hundred one patients with active RA who were taking stable methotrexate were randomized 2:1:1:1:1 to placebo or once-daily baricitinib (1, 2, 4, or 8 mg) for up to 24 weeks. One hundred fifty-four patients with definitive radiographic erosion had MRI of the hand/wrist at baseline and at weeks 12 and 24. Two expert radiologists, blinded to treatment and visit order, scored images for synovitis, osteitis, bone erosion, and cartilage loss. Combined inflammation (osteitis + 3× synovitis score) and total joint damage (erosion + 2.5× cartilage loss score) scores were calculated. Treatment groups were compared using ANCOVA adjusting for baseline scores. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline to Week 12 for synovitis were -0.10, -1.50, and -1.60 for patients treated with placebo, baricitinib 4 mg, and baricitinib 8 mg, respectively (p = 0.003 vs placebo for baricitinib 4 and 8 mg). Mean changes for osteitis were 0.00, -3.20, and -2.10 (p = 0.001 vs placebo for baricitinib 4 mg and p = 0.037 for 8 mg), respectively. Mean changes for bone erosion were 0.90, 0.10, and 0.40 (p = 0.089 for 4 mg and p = 0.275 for 8 mg), respectively, in these treatment groups. CONCLUSION: MRI findings in this subgroup of patients suggest suppression of synovitis, osteitis, and combined inflammation by baricitinib 4 and 8 mg. This corroborates previously demonstrated clinical efficacy of baricitinib and increases confidence that baricitinib 4 mg could reduce the radiographic progression in phase III studies. [Clinical trial registration number (www.ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT01185353].

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of the safety and efficacy of INCB039110, an oral janus kinase 1 inhibitor, in patients with stable, chronic plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic plaque psoriasis is partially mediated by elevation of proinflammatory cytokines, including several within the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the oral selective JAK1 inhibitor INCB039110 in stable, chronic plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study of INCB039110 (100 mg once daily, 200 mg once daily, 200 mg twice daily and 600 mg once daily) for 28 days. The primary endpoint was mean percent change from baseline in the static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) at day 28. The protocol was institutional review board approved. RESULTS: Of 50 patients, 48 completed the study. At day 28, mean percent reduction from baseline in sPGA was 22.2% for INCB039110 100 mg once daily (p = 0.270 vs. placebo), 29.4% for 200 mg once daily (p = 0.118), 35.2% for 200 mg twice daily (p = 0.053), 42.4% for 600 mg once daily (p = 0.003) and 12.5% for placebo. Across groups, 11.1% to 45.5% achieved an sPGA score of 1 versus 0% for placebo. INCB039110 was generally well tolerated; the most common treatment-emergent adverse event was nasopharyngitis (18.4%). CONCLUSION: INCB039110 produced significant improvements in sPGA, demonstrating proof of concept in chronic plaque psoriasis.

Safety and efficacy of baricitinib at 24†weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate baricitinib (LY3009104, formerly INCB028050), a novel, oral inhibitor of JAK1/JAK2 in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with methotrexate. METHODS: In this phase IIb study, 301 patients were randomised 2:1:1:1:1 to receive once daily doses of placebo or 1, 2, 4 or 8 mg baricitinib for 12 weeks. Patients assigned to 2, 4 and 8 mg baricitinib continued blinded treatment for an additional 12 weeks. Patients assigned to placebo or 1 mg baricitinib were reassigned to 2 mg twice daily or 4 mg once daily baricitinib between weeks 12-24. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in the combined 4 and 8 mg groups achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response versus placebo at week 12. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the combined baricitinib 4 and 8 mg groups compared with placebo achieved an ACR20 response at week 12 (76% vs 41%, p<0.001). At week 12, significant differences versus placebo were also observed in patients achieving ACR50, ACR70 and remission as measured by Disease Activity Score for 28-joint counts, Clinical Disease Activity Index and Simplified Disease Activity Index. Patients receiving 2, 4, or 8 mg baricitinib maintained or improved in all measures through 24 weeks. Similar proportions of patients experienced at least one adverse event in the placebo and baricitinib groups. Serious infections developed in three patients receiving baricitinib. No cases of tuberculosis, herpes zoster, opportunistic infections or deaths were reported. Dose-dependent decreases in haemoglobin were observed with baricitinib. CONCLUSIONS: Baricitinib improved the signs and symptoms of RA in methotrexate inadequate responders with active disease. Baricitinib was well tolerated with no unexpected safety findings through week 24. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01185353.

JAK inhibition for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a new era in oral DMARD therapy.

INTRODUCTION: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) there is a significant medical need for safe and effective oral disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for patients who respond inadequately to methotrexate, the first-line therapy in RA. Oral agents targeting Janus-associated kinases (JAKs) are the most promising new agents in clinical development. This review describes the preclinical and clinical activities of the most advanced JAK inhibitors with different JAK selectivity profiles. AREAS COVERED: This review first describes the current treatment landscape and the pathophysiology of RA. Role for cytokines in the disease pathogenesis followed by significance of JAK/STAT pathway in cytokine signaling are discussed. Available chemical description and enzymatic data on the most advanced JAK inhibitors in clinical development are provided. Preclinical and clinical results that are publicly available are summarized. Review of literature was conducted using National Library of Medicine (NLM) database, 'PubMed'. In addition, all publicly disclosed data from companies that are developing the JAK inhibitors was researched to obtain the most up-to-date information of the compounds discussed in this report. EXPERT OPINION: Emerging clinical results demonstrate that JAK inhibition is a validated new mechanism for the development of oral DMARD agents that is likely to join the armamentarium against RA in the near future.

Comparison of radiographic joint space width with magnetic resonance imaging cartilage morphometry: analysis of longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiography are established imaging modalities for the assessment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The objective of our study was to compare the responsiveness of radiographic joint space width (JSW) with MRI-derived measures of cartilage morphometry for OA progression in participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). METHODS: This study examined the baseline and 12-month visits of a subset of 150 subjects from the OAI. Measurement of radiographic JSW was facilitated by the use of automated software that delineated the femoral and tibial margins of the joint. Measures of medial compartment minimum JSW and JSW at fixed locations were compared with cartilage morphometry measures derived from MRI. The results were stratified by Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) scale grade and by tibiofemoral anatomic axis angle. In order to examine the relative responsiveness of various techniques, we calculated the standardized response mean (SRM) between the 2 visits. RESULTS: The SRM for radiographic JSW measured at the optimal location was -0.32 compared with -0.39 for the most responsive MRI measure. For the subgroup with a K/L scale grade of 2 or 3, the most responsive SRM values were -0.34 for radiographic JSW and -0.42 for MRI. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that new measures using a software analysis of digital knee radiographic images are comparable with MRI in detecting OA progression, and potentially superior when considering the cost-effectiveness of the 2 imaging modalities.

Comparison of a single infusion of zoledronic acid with risedronate for Paget's disease.

BACKGROUND: The advent of bisphosphonates advanced therapy for Paget's disease, but more effective and convenient agents are needed to increase adherence. Zoledronic acid, a bisphosphonate administered as a single intravenous infusion, might meet these needs. METHODS: In two identical, randomized, double-blind, actively controlled trials of 6 months' duration, we compared one 15-minute infusion of 5 mg of zoledronic acid with 60 days of oral risedronate (30 mg per day). The primary efficacy end point was the rate of therapeutic response at six months, defined as a normalization of alkaline phosphatase levels or a reduction of at least 75 percent in the total alkaline phosphatase excess. The results of the studies were pooled. RESULTS: At six months, 96.0 percent of patients receiving zoledronic acid had a therapeutic response (169 of 176), as compared with 74.3 percent of patients receiving risedronate (127 of 171, P<0.001). Alkaline phosphatase levels normalized in 88.6 percent of patients in the zoledronic acid group and 57.9 percent of patients in the risedronate group (P<0.001). Zoledronic acid was associated with a shorter median time to a first therapeutic response (64 vs. 89 days, P<0.001). Higher response rates in the zoledronic acid group were consistent across all demographic, disease-severity, and treatment-history subgroups and with changes in other bone-turnover markers. The physical-component summary score of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey, a measure of the quality of life, increased significantly from baseline at both three and six months in the zoledronic acid group and differed significantly from those in the risedronate group at three months. Pain scores improved in both groups. During post-trial follow-up (median, 190 days), 21 of 82 patients in the risedronate group had a loss of therapeutic response, as compared with 1 of 113 patients in the zoledronic acid group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A single infusion of zoledronic acid produces more rapid, more complete, and more sustained responses in Paget's disease than does daily treatment with risedronate.