A Feasibility Study of Functional Lung Volume Preservation during Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Guided by Gallium-68 Perfusion PET/CT.

The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of sparing functional lung areas by integration of pulmonary functional mapping guided by 68Ga-perfusion PET/CT imaging in lung SBRT planification. Sixty patients that planned to receive SBRT for primary or secondary lung tumors were prospectively enrolled. Lung functional volumes were defined as the minimal volume containing 50% (FV50%), 70% (FV70%) and 90% (FV90%) of the total activity within the anatomical volume. All patients had a treatment planning carried out in 2 stages: an anatomical planning blinded to the PET results and then a functional planning respecting the standard constraints but also incorporating "lung functional volume" constraints. The mean lung dose (MLD) in functional volumes and the percentage of lung volumes receiving xGy (VxGy) within the lung functional volumes using both plans were calculated and compared. SBRT planning optimized to spare lung functional regions led to a significant reduction (p < 0.0001) of the MLD and V5 to V20 Gy in all functional volumes. Median relative difference of the MLD in the FV50%, FV70% and FV90% was -8.0% (-43.0 to 1.2%), -7.1% (-34.3 to 1.2%) and -5.7% (-22.3 to 4.4%), respectively. Median relative differences for VxGy ranged from -12.5% to -9.2% in the FV50%, -11.3% to -7.2% in the FV70% and -8.0% to -5.3% in the FV90%. This study shows the feasibility of significantly decreasing the doses delivered to the lung functional volumes using 68Ga-perfusion PET/CT while still respecting target volume coverage and doses to other organs at risk.

Inhomogeneous tumor dose distribution provides better local control than homogeneous distribution in stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of inhomogeneous versus homogeneous dose distribution on local control (LC) and radionecrosis (RN) in patients treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for newly-diagnosed brain metastases (BM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2014 to 2017, 134 patients (median age 61 years) underwent SRT for BM (n = 114 with ≤2, n = 20 with 3-6 BM) at our institution. Treatment was delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy on a linear accelerator. Ninety-one consecutive patients (BM = 136) were irradiated at a dose of 21-23.1 Gy in 3 fractions delivered homogeneously (99% of the dose had to cover 99% of the planning target volume (PTV)) (group 1) whereas the following 43 patients (BM = 72) received an inhomogeneous dose of 10 or 11 Gy prescribed to the isocenter with the 70% isodose line covering the PTV (group 2). Variables analyzed included dose distribution, age, gender, histology, diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment score, number of brain metastases, presence of extracranial metastases, and tumor volumes. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 12.4 months (range, 1.4-33.1), the 1-year LC and RN rate were 78% and 7.5% in group 1 and 93% and 0% in group 2, respectively (p = 0.005). In multivariate analysis, improved LC was significantly correlated with SRT dose distribution (p = 0.009) and tumor volume (p = 0.03). The number of metastases (p = 0.03) and SRT dose distribution (p = 0.04) were both associated with increased risk of RN. CONCLUSION: SRT delivered with inhomogeneous dose distribution resulted in better LC and a lower risk of RN compared to homogeneous distribution.

Cosmetic Outcome and Chronic Breast Toxicity After Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) as a Single Modality or as a Boost Using the Intrabeam® Device: A Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: We aim to report our results in terms of chronic toxicities and cosmetic outcomes after intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) using kV X-rays in women treated for early breast cancer at our institution. METHODS: Patients with early breast carcinoma were recruited between April 2011 and November 2014. After breast-conserving surgery, patients were treated with IORT using the Intrabeam® device. IORT was completed by whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) at a dose of 46-50.4 Gy in 23-28 fractions in case of adverse pathologic criteria on the final specimen examination. Skin toxicity was graded using the Late Effects in Normal Tissues-Subjective, Objective, Management and Analytic (LENT-SOMA) scale every 6 months, and cosmetic outcomes were evaluated at 36 months by patient self-evaluation and by two radiation oncologists, on a 1-10 scale. RESULTS: Forty-one women received IORT only and 30 patients received IORT followed by WBRT (IORT + WBRT group). After a median follow-up of 38.9 months, no locoregional or distant recurrence occurred. After IORT only, 2.4% of grade 2 or higher breast fibrosis, and no other grade 2 or higher disease, was observed. In the IORT + WBRT group, grade 2 or higher fibrosis and grade 2 or higher breast retraction were observed in 43.3 and 23.3% of patients, respectively. Objective cosmetic outcomes were very good and significantly better in the IORT-only group compared with the IORT + WBRT group (8.87 vs. 6.96) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: IORT using the Intrabeam® is well-tolerated, with very little chronic toxicity and good cosmetic outcome. However, a high rate of grade 2 or higher chronic breast toxicity was observed when IORT had to be completed by WBRT.