Bone densitometry in Thalassemia major: a closer look at pitfalls and operator-related errors in a 10-year follow-up population.

PURPOSE: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) with tolerable error rate, high precision, and excellent consistency. Our objective was to investigate the frequency and distribution of errors in a cohort of patients with Thalassemia major (TM). METHODS: We reviewed the DXA examinations of 340 patients with ß-TM followed by our institution, acquired in different imaging centers between 2009 and 2019. We collected sex and age at the time of the first examination and at the last visit, as well as BMD, T-score, and Z-score values. Errors were analyzed by anatomical site (lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck). RESULTS: Out of 5099 total DXA scans, 11.85% presented one or more errors. Specifically, the incorrect examinations were 315 out of 1707 (18.45%) at the lumbar spine level, 113 out of 1697 (6.66%) at the total hip, 176 out of 1695 (10.38%) at the femoral neck. Errors in vertebral inclusion were the most frequently registered (45.86%). A significant difference resulted from the comparison of the T-score and Z-score median values of all the lumbar spine DXA examinations and the correct ones (p value 0.037 and 0.0003, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although not directly involved in the performance and interpretation of DXA, physicians interested in osteoporosis management should be familiar with the protocols to minimize errors and allow the proper use of bone densitometry. DXA obtained at the spine level is more frequently affected by errors in patients with TM, potentially influencing the diagnostic assessment of bone health status.

Diffuse panbronchiolitis as parathymic syndrome in a Caucasian man previously treated for thymoma.

Diffuse panbronchiolitis (DPB) is a rare disease characterized by bronchiolitis and chronic sinusitis. Being largely restricted to East Asia, its actual incidence in Caucasian patients is probably underestimated. DPB has been described in association with thymic neoplasms, mainly arising as a consequence of immune dysregulation. We present a rare case of DPB diagnosed in a 69-year-old Caucasian man who had undergone surgery for stage 2A thymoma a year before. The patient came to our hospital complaining of exertional dyspnea and productive cough, with a persistent lung consolidation described at chest X-rays. High resolution computed tomography (CT) showed diffuse centrilobular micronodules and solid nodules, tree-in-bud opacities, peripheral consolidations and cylindrical bronchiectasis. Sinus disease was also demonstrated by CT. Analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage showed marked granulocyte inflammation and allowed the isolation of Haemophilus Influenzae. Consequently, the diagnosis of DPB was reached by integrating clinical, and radiological data. Long-term therapy with azithromycin was prescribed, and was found to be effective in controlling symptoms and reducing radiological abnormalities at 6-month clinical and CT follow-up. Confidence with the radiological presentation and clinical significance of DPB is necessary, since the condition is responsive and reversible to long-term macrolide treatment, the effect of which is mainly attributed to an anti-inflammatory, and immunoregulatory action.