ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Despite the wide range of medical and interventional therapy options available, some patients with Crohn's disease (CD) need an ileostomy or colostomy. The aim of this study was to identify clinical, surgical and drug-related predictors of successful stoma reversal in CD patients. METHODS: A retrospective medical record analysis of surgical department logs, hospital discharge letters and patient reports from outpatient departments was performed for all CD patients who underwent a first ostomy surgery. RESULTS: Our study analysed a total of 149 patients (76 women, 73 men, median age at first stoma of 34 years after a median CD duration of 9 years), with a median follow-up of 78.4 (IQR 88.6) months after first ostomy surgery. Of these patients, 73 (49%) underwent stoma reversal after a median of 11.7 months (IQR 15.7 months) of whom 17 (23.3%) needed a second stoma. In multivariant analysis, Montreal A1 classification (HR 2.07; 95% confidence interval 1.23-3.47; p = 0.006), a primary laparotomy (HR 2.30; 95% confidence interval 1.20-4.41; p = 0.012) and the absence of perianal/rectal CD activity (HR 3.00; 95% confidence interval 1.86-4.86; p < 0.001) emerged as independent predictors of a shorter time to stoma reversal. Introduction or switch of biological therapy after first stoma was not associated with successful reversal of the stoma (OR 4.6 95% confidence interval 1.45-14.66; p = 0.01). Laboratory parameters had no influence. CONCLUSION: Clinical and surgical features-rather than medication or laboratory findings-were found to be predictors of successful stoma reversal in CD patients. Future studies focusing on the definition of a Standard Operation Procedure for emergency and elective CD surgery are warranted.
Subject(s)
Crohn Disease , Surgical Stomas , Adult , Colostomy/methods , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/surgery , Female , Humans , Ileostomy/adverse effects , Ileostomy/methods , Male , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Stomas/adverse effectsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The influence of a SARS-CoV-2 infection on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not yet been well characterized and it is unclear whether this requires an adaptation of the immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: A national register was established for the retrospective documentation of clinical parameters and changes in immunosuppressive therapy in SARS-CoV-2 infected IBD patients. RESULTS: In total, only 3 of 185 IBD patients (1.6â%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection because of abdominal symptoms. In the course of COVID-19 disease, 43.5â% developed diarrhea, abdominal pain or hematochezia (risk of hospitalization with vs. without abdominal symptoms: 20.0â% vs. 10.6â%, pâ<â0.01). With active IBD at the time of SARS-CoV-2 detection, there was an increased risk of hospitalization (remission 11.2â%, active IBD 23.3â% pâ<â0.05). IBD-specific therapy remained unchanged in 115 patients (71.4â%); the most common change was an interruption of systemic therapy (16.2â%). DISCUSSION: New abdominal symptoms often appeared in SARS-CoV-2 infected IBD patients. However, these only rarely led to SARS-CoV-2 testing. A high IBD activity at the time of SARS-CoV-2 detection was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization.
