Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Am J Crit Care ; 20(2): 109-17; quiz 118, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21362715

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tube cuff pressure must be kept within an optimal range that ensures ventilation and prevents aspiration while maintaining tracheal perfusion. OBJECTIVES: To test the effect of an intervention (adding or removing air) on the proportion of time that cuff pressure was between 20 and 30 cm H(2)O and to evaluate changes in cuff pressure over time. METHODS: A repeated-measure crossover design was used to study 32 orally intubated patients receiving mechanical ventilation for two 12-hour shifts (randomized control and intervention conditions). Continuous cuff pressure monitoring was initiated, and the pressure was adjusted to a minimum of 22 cm H(2)O. Caregivers were blinded to cuff pressure data, and usual care was provided during the control condition. During the intervention condition, cuff pressure alarm or clinical triggers guided the intervention. RESULTS: Most patients were men (mean age, 61.6 years). During the control condition, 51.7% of cuff pressure values were out of range compared with 11.1% during the intervention condition (P < .001). During the intervention, a mean of 8 adjustments were required, mostly to add air to the endotracheal tube cuff (mean 0.28 [SD, 0.13] mL). During the control condition, cuff pressure decreased over time (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was effective in maintaining cuff pressure within an optimal range, and cuff pressure decreased over time without intervention. The effect of the intervention on outcomes such as ventilator-associated pneumonia and tracheal damage requires further study.


Subject(s)
Air Pressure , Airway Management/instrumentation , Equipment Failure , Intubation, Intratracheal/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Over Studies , Education, Continuing , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Respiratory Aspiration/prevention & control , Southeastern United States
2.
Am J Crit Care ; 18(2): 133-43, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19255103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tube cuff pressure must be maintained within a narrow therapeutic range to prevent complications. Cuff pressure is measured and adjusted intermittently. OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy and feasibility of continuous monitoring of cuff pressure, describe changes in cuff pressure over time, and identify clinical factors that influence cuff pressure. METHODS: In a pilot study, data were collected for a mean of 9.3 hours on 10 patients who were orally intubated and receiving mechanical ventilation. Sixty percent of the patients were white, mean age was 55 years, and mean intubation time was 2.8 days. The initial cuff pressure was adjusted to a minimum of 20 cm H2O. The pilot balloon of the endotracheal tube was connected to a transducer and a pressure monitor. Cuff pressure was recorded every 0.008 seconds during a typical 12-hour shift and was reduced to 1-minute means. Patient care activities and interventions were recorded on a personal digital assistant. RESULTS: Values obtained with the cufflator-manometer and the transducer were congruent. Only 54% of cuff pressure measurements were within the recommended range of 20 to 30 cm H2O. The cuff pressure was high in 16% of measurements and low in 30%. No statistically significant changes over time were noted. Endotracheal suctioning, coughing, and positioning affected cuff pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous monitoring of cuff pressure is feasible, accurate, and safe. Cuff pressures vary widely among patients.


Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Intubation, Intratracheal , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Pressure , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results , Respiration, Artificial
3.
Am J Crit Care ; 12(3): 220-30; quiz 231-2, 2003 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12751396

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia, common in critically ill patients, is associated with microaspiration of oropharyngeal secretions and may be related to suctioning and airway management practices. OBJECTIVES: To describe institutional policies and procedures related to closed-system suctioning and airway management of intubated patients, and to compare practices of registered nurses and respiratory therapists. METHODS: A descriptive, comparative, multisite study of facilities that use closed-system suctioning devices on most intubated adults was conducted. Nurses and respiratory therapists who worked at the sites completed surveys related to their practices. RESULTS: A total of 1665 nurses and respiratory therapists at 27 sites throughout the United States responded. The typical respondent had at least 6 years' experience with patients receiving mechanical ventilation (61%) and a baccalaureate degree or higher (54%). Most sites had policies for management of endotracheal tube cuffs (93%), hyperoxygenation (89%) and use of gloves (70%) with closed-system suctioning, and instillation of isotonic sodium chloride solution for thick secretions (74%). Only 48% of policies addressed oral care and 37% addressed oral suctioning. Nurses did more oral suctioning and oral care than respiratory therapists did, and respiratory therapists instilled sodium chloride solution more and rinsed the suctioning device more often than nurses did. CONCLUSIONS: Policies vary widely and do not always reflect current research. Consistent performance of practices such as wearing gloves for airway management and maintaining endotracheal cuff pressures must be evaluated. Collaborative, research-based policies and procedures must be developed and implemented to ensure best practices for intubated patients.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/etiology , Nursing Care/methods , Pneumonia/etiology , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Suction/methods , Adult , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Humans , Intubation, Intratracheal/methods , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology
5.
Am J Crit Care ; 11(2): 141-9, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11888126

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contamination of equipment, colonization of the oropharynx, and microaspiration of secretions are causative factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia. Suctioning and airway management practices may influence the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia. OBJECTIVES: To identify pathogens associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia in oral and endotracheal aspirates and to evaluate bacterial growth on oral and endotracheal suctioning equipment. METHODS: Specimens were collected from 20 subjects who were orally intubated for at least 24 hours and required mechanical ventilation. At baseline, oral and sputum specimens were obtained for culturing, and suctioning equipment was changed. Specimens from the mouth, sputum, and equipment for culturing were obtained at 24 hours (n=18) and 48 hours (n=10). RESULTS: After 24 hours, all subjects had potential pathogens in the mouth, and 67% had sputum cultures positive for pathogens. Suctioning devices were colonized with many of the same pathogens that were present in the mouth. Nearly all (94%) of tonsil suction devices were colonized within 24 hours. Most potential pathogens were gram-positive bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria and antibiotic-resistant organisms were also present in several samples. CANCLUSIONS: The presence of pathogens in oral and sputum specimens in most patients supports the notion that microaspiration of secretions occurs. Colonization is a risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia. The equipment used for oral and endotracheal suctioning becomes colonized with potential pathogens within 24 hours. It is not known if reusable oral suction equipment contributes to colonization; however, because many bacteria are exogenous to patients' normal flora, equipment may be a source of cross-contamination.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/etiology , Equipment Contamination , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects , Pneumonia, Bacterial/etiology , Suction/adverse effects , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharynx/microbiology , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors , Sputum/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...