Handmade spacers for two-stage exchange at the hip.

OBJECTIVE: Two-stage exchange with implantation of a temporary spacer is the gold standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. This article describes a simple and safe technique for handmade spacers at the hip. INDICATION: Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Septic arthritis of the native joint. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Known allergy against components of polymethylmethacrylate bone cements. Inadequate compliance for two-stage exchange. Patient unfit to undergo two-stage exchange. Bony defect situation at the acetabulum impeding stable reduction of the spacer. Bone loss at the femur jeopardizing stable fixation of the stem. Soft tissue damage with need for plastic temporary vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAC) therapy. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Tailoring bone cement with antibiotics. Preparation of a metal endoskeleton. Molding of spacer stem and head by hand. Customizing spacer off-sets to bony anatomy and soft tissue tension. Implantation assuring rotational stability at the femur with a bone cement collar. Confirmation of correct position by intraoperative radiography. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Restricted weight-bearing. Range of motion as possible. Reimplantation after successful treatment of infection.

Demographics and Etiology for Lower Extremity Amputations-Experiences of an University Orthopaedic Center in Germany.

Background and Objectives: Currently, the worldwide incidence of major amputations in the general population is decreasing whereas the incidence of minor amputations is increasing. The purpose of our study was to analyze whether this trend is reflected among orthopaedic patients treated with lower extremity amputation in our orthopaedic university institution. Materials and Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study and included patients referred to our orthopaedic department for lower extremity amputation (LEA) between January 2007 and December 2019. Acquired data were the year of amputation, age, sex, level of amputation and cause of amputation. T test and Chi² test were performed to compare age and amputation rates between males and females; significance was defined as p < 0.05. Linear regression and multivariate logistic regression models were used to test time trends and to calculate probabilities for LEA. Results: A total of 114 amputations of the lower extremity were performed, of which 60.5% were major amputations. The number of major amputations increased over time with a rate of 0.6 amputation/year. Men were significantly more often affected by LEA than women. Age of LEA for men was significantly below the age of LEA for women (men: 54.8 ± 2.8 years, women: 64.9 ± 3.2 years, p = 0.021). Main causes leading to LEA were tumors (28.9%) and implant-associated complications (25.4%). Implant-associated complications and age raised the probability for major amputation, whereas malformation, angiopathies and infections were more likely to cause a minor amputation. Conclusions: Among patients in our orthopaedic institution, etiology of amputations of the lower extremity is multifactorial and differs from other surgical specialties. The number of major amputations has increased continuously over the past years. Age and sex, as well as diagnosis, influence the type and level of amputation.

PMMA Bone Cement: Antibiotic Elution and Mechanical Properties in the Context of Clinical Use.

This literature review discusses the use of antibiotic loaded polymethylmethacrylate bone cements in arthroplasty. The clinically relevant differences that have to be considered when antibiotic loaded bone cements (ALBC) are used either for long-term implant fixation or as spacers for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections are outlined. In this context, in vitro findings for antibiotic elution and material properties are summarized and transferred to clinical use.

Modifiable Individual Risks of Perioperative Blood Transfusions and Acute Postoperative Complications in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study was to identify modifiable patient-related predictors of blood transfusions and perioperative complications in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Individual predictor-adjusted risks can be used to define preoperative treatment thresholds. METHODS: We performed this retrospective monocentric study in orthopaedic patients who underwent primary total knee or hip arthroplasty. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the predictive value of patient-related characteristics. Predictor-adjusted individual risks of blood transfusions and the occurrence of any perioperative adverse event were calculated for potentially modifiable risk factors. RESULTS: 3754 patients were included in this study. The overall blood transfusion and complication rates were 4.8% and 6.4%, respectively. Haemoglobin concentration (Hb, p < 0.001), low body mass index (BMI, p < 0.001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, p = 0.004) were the strongest potentially modifiable predictors of a blood transfusion. EGFR (p = 0.001) was the strongest potentially modifiable predictor of a complication. Predictor-adjusted risks of blood transfusions and acute postoperative complications were calculated for Hb and eGFR. Hb = 12.5 g/dL, BMI = 17.6 kg/m2, and eGFR = 54 min/mL were associated, respectively, with a 10% risk of a blood transfusion, eGFR = 59 mL/min was associated with a 10% risk of a complication. CONCLUSION: The individual risks for blood transfusions and acute postoperative complications are strongly increased in patients with a low preoperative Hb, low BMI or low eGFR. We recommend aiming at a preoperative Hb ≥ 13g/dL, an eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min and to avoid a low BMI. Future studies must show if a preoperative increase of eGFR and BMI is feasible and truly beneficial.

Do not exchange the spacer during staged TKA exchange!

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the reinfection rate and risk factors for septic failure after two-stage exchange for chronic periprosthetic joint infections of primary total knee arthroplasties. Reinfections should be classified as new infection or as infection recurrence after two-stage exchange. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 60 knees with chronic periprosthetic joint infections. Follow-up information was extracted from the departments electronic database. RESULTS: The reinfection rate after a mean follow-up of 35.6 months (1-135) was 20.0%. The only significant risk factor for reinfection was spacer exchange during two-stage exchange (OR = 10.42; p = 0.001). Of the 12 cases with reinfection 6 cases were classified as new infection and 2 as infection recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patient specific factors for reinfection remain furtive. If a spacer exchange is preformed, the risk of reinfection increases. Culture results indicate that the benefit of spacer exchanges during two-stage exchange is highly questionable, particularly because reinfection is an issue of new infection rather than of infection recurrence.

Antibiotic elution and compressive strength of gentamicin/vancomycin loaded bone cements are considerably influenced by immersion fluid volume.

The effect of doubling the immersion fluid (eluate) volume on antibiotic concentrations and on mechanical stability from vancomycin and gentamicin loaded bone cements was investigated in vitro. Antibiotic loaded bone cements containing premixed 1.34% gentamicin antibiotic concentration in the cement powder (wt), premixed 1.19% gentamicin wt and 4.76% vancomycin wt and premixed 1.17% wt gentamicin additionally manually blended with 4.68% wt vancomycin were tested. Six specimens per group were immersed in 4 ml and 8 ml for 6 weeks while the eluate was exchanged every 24 h. The antibiotic concentrations were repeatedly measured. Then the specimens were tested for compressive strength. Doubling the eluate volume significantly decreased gentamicin and vancomycin concentrations from 6 h and 24 h on, except for the gentamicin concentration of the additionally manually blended formulation after 3 weeks. The additionally manually blended vancomycin formulation produced significantly higher gentamicin concentrations in 8 ml compared to the other formulations. The reduction ratios of the vancomycin concentrations were significantly smaller than the reduction ratios of the gentamicin concentrations for the manually blended vancomycin formulation. Vancomycin containing formulations showed significantly lower compressive strengths than the vancomycin free formulation after immersion. Doubling the eluate volume lead to significant compressive strength reduction of the vancomycin containing formulations. Eluate volume change influences antibiotic elution dependent on the antibiotic combination and loading technique. The reducing effect is higher on vancomycin than on gentamicin elution. Compressive strength of gentamicin/vancomycin loaded bone cements after immersion is eluate volume dependent.

Comparison of Elution Characteristics and Compressive Strength of Biantibiotic-Loaded PMMA Bone Cement for Spacers: Copal® Spacem with Gentamicin and Vancomycin versus Palacos® R+G with Vancomycin.

PURPOSE: Copal® spacem is a new PMMA bone cement for fabricating spacers. This study compares elution of gentamicin, elution of vancomycin, and compressive strength of Copal® spacem and of Palacos® R+G at different vancomycin loadings in the powder of the cements. We hypothesized that antibiotic elution of Copal® spacem is superior at comparable compressive strength. METHODS: Compression test specimens were fabricated using Copal® spacem manually loaded with 0.5 g gentamicin and additionally 2 g, 4 g, and 6 g of vancomycin per 40 g of cement powder (COP specimens) and using 0.5 g gentamicin premixed Palacos® R+G manually loaded with 2 g, 4 g, and 6 g of vancomycin per 40 g of cement powder (PAL specimens). These specimens were used for determination of gentamicin and vancomycin elution (in fetal calf serum, at 22°C) and for determination of compressive strength both prior and following the elution tests. RESULTS: Cumulative gentamicin concentrations (p < 0.005) and gentamicin concentration after 28 days (p ≤ 0.043) were significantly lower for COP specimens compared to PAL specimens. Cumulative vancomycin concentrations were significantly higher (p ≤ 0.043) for COP specimens after the second day. Vancomycin concentrations after 28 days were not significantly higher for the Copal specimens loaded with 2 g and 4 g of vancomycin. Compressive strength was not significantly different between COP specimens and PAL specimens before elution tests. Compressive strength after the elution tests was significantly lower (p = 0.005) for COP specimens loaded with 2 g of vancomycin. CONCLUSION: We could not demonstrate consistent superior antibiotic elution from Copal® spacem compared to Palacos® R+G for fabricating gentamicin and vancomycin loaded spacers. The results do not favor Copal® spacem over Palacos® R+G for the use as a gentamicin and vancomycin biantibiotic-loaded spacer.

Synovial Fluid Aspiration Should Not Be Routinely Performed during the Two-Stage Exchange of the Knee.

PURPOSE: Detection of infection persistence during the two-stage exchange of the knee for periprosthetic joint infection is challenging. Synovial fluid culture (SFC) and synovial white blood cell count (SWBCC) before joint reimplantation are widespread diagnostic means for this indication. The sensitivity and specificity of SFC and of SWBCC for infection persistence before planned reimplantation were evaluated. METHODS: 94 two-stage exchanges of the knee with synovial fluid aspiration performed after a drug holiday of at least 14 days and before reimplantation or spacer exchange (planned reimplantation) were retrospectively analyzed. Only cases with at least 3 intraoperative samples at planned reimplantation were included. SFC and SWBCC were compared to pathogen detection (SFC(culture)/SWBCC(culture)) and to histopathological signs of infection persistence (SFC(histo)/SWBCC(histo)) from intraoperative samples at planned reimplantation. For SFC, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated. For SWBCC, the optimal cut-off value with its sensitivity and specificity was calculated with the Youden-Index. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity of SFC(culture) were 0.0% and 98.9%. Sensitivity and specificity of SFC(histo) were 3.4% and 100%. The optimal cut-off value for SWBCC(culture) was 4450 cells/µl with a sensitivity of 50.0% and a specificity of 86.5%. The optimal cut-off value for SWBCC(histo) was 3250 cells/µl with a sensitivity of 35.7% and a specificity of 92.9%. CONCLUSION: The detection of infection persistence remains challenging and a consented approach is lacking. The results do not warrant the routine performance of SFC during the two-stage exchange at the knee. SWBCC can be used to confirm infection persistence at high cut-offs, but they only occur in few patients and are therefore inappropriate for the routine use.

Insufficient sensitivity of joint aspiration during the two-stage exchange of the hip with spacers.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of infection persistence during the two-stage exchange of the hip is challenging. Joint aspiration before reconstruction is supposed to rule out infection persistence. Sensitivity and specificity of synovial fluid culture and synovial leucocyte count for detecting infection persistence during the two-stage exchange of the hip were evaluated. METHODS: Ninety-two aspirations before planned joint reconstruction during the two-stage exchange with spacers of the hip were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of synovial fluid culture was 4.6 and 94.3%. The sensitivity and specificity of synovial leucocyte count at a cut-off value of 2000 cells/µl was 25.0 and 96.9%. C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values were significantly higher before prosthesis removal and reconstruction or spacer exchange (p = 0.00; p = 0.013 and p = 0.039; p = 0.002) in the infection persistence group. Receiver operating characteristic area under the curve values before prosthesis removal and reconstruction or spacer exchange for ESR were lower (0.516 and 0.635) than for CRP (0.720 and 0.671). CONCLUSIONS: Synovial fluid culture and leucocyte count cannot rule out infection persistence during the two-stage exchange of the hip.

Loading with vancomycin does not decrease gentamicin elution in gentamicin premixed bone cement.

Antibiotic loaded bone cements are used as drug delivery systems for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. They can be loaded with antibiotics during industrial component production (premixing) and during cement preparation (manually blending). Although double premixed antibiotic loaded bone cements are available, manually blending of a gentamicin premixed antibiotic loaded bone cement with vancomycin is still popular. We compared in vitro antibiotic elution and compressive strength of 0.5 g gentamicin premixed bone cement (PALACOS® R + G), 0.5 g gentamicin premixed bone cement (PALACOS® R + G) manually blended with 2.0 g vancomycin, 0.5 g gentamicin and 2.0 g vancomycin premixed bone cement (COPAL® G + V), 1 g gentamicin and clindamycin premixed bone cement (COPAL® G + C) and bone cement without an antibiotic (PALACOS® R) as control. Antibiotic concentration measurements were performed for 6 weeks and then compression strength was tested. Concentrations of gentamicin showed no significant differences between PALACOS® R + G, PALACOS® R + G with vancomycin and COPAL G® + V. After 48 h COPAL G® + C produced significantly higher gentamicin concentrations than the other formulations. After 12 h PALACOS® R + G with vancomycin produced significantly higher vancomycin concentrations, but had the lowest compression strength. We found no influence of vancomycin addition on gentamicin elution, irrespectively of the loading method. However, the manually vancomycin blended ALBC produced higher vancomycin concentrations. Compression strength after aging is reduced by loading with vancomycin.