ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Thoracoscopic esophageal atresia with tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA/TEF) repair requires the gentle manipulation of delicate tissue. Force sensors were attached to the upper and lower esophagus of a 3D-printed EA/TEF simulator to explore force parameters as markers of performance. METHODS: Participants completed one intracorporeal suture between the anterior walls of upper and lower esophageal ends. Longitudinal force data were recorded at each end. A blinded pediatric surgeon marked attempt videos. Excessive force events, maximum tension, and force interquartile range (IQR) were measured. Data were reported as median (range) significance of p < 0.05. RESULTS: 17 participants of varying levels of experience performed the task. OSATS scores showed significant differences between experts and novices. Experts completed the task in a median time of 4 min. They used lower maximum tension, higher force IQR, and had fewer excess force events compared to the intermediate and novice groups. DISCUSSION: The application of force was dependent on expertise with more skilled participants having fewer excess force events. The higher expert force IQR likely reflects the consistent tension needed for task completion. Analysis of force data may be an indicator of competence, and trainees may benefit from a thoracoscopic simulator which provides force data feedback. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Atresia , Tracheoesophageal Fistula , Child , Humans , Esophageal Atresia/surgery , Thoracoscopy , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/surgery , Anastomosis, SurgicalABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Acquiring the technical skills required for thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheo-esophageal fistula (EA/TEF) is challenging. A high-fidelity 3D-printed pediatric thoracoscopic EA/TEF simulator has been developed to address this issue. This study explored motion-tracking as an assessment tool to distinguish between surgeons of different expertise using the simulator. METHODS: Participants performed a single intracorporeal suture between the esophageal ends in EA with TEF. Total relative path lengths of the right and left surgical instruments were recorded during the task. Each video-recorded attempt was assessed by a blinded pediatric surgeon using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) score. Data recorded as median (range) and statistical significance as p<0.05. RESULTS: The task was performed by 17 participants. The median OSATS scores identified a significant difference between experts and novices. A difference between left- and right-hands was only found in the mid-skill level group. Right-hand path length was greatest in novices and lowest in experts. Left-hand path length was greatest in novices and the mid-skill level group compared to experts. CONCLUSION: Experts had the lowest total path length for either hand, suggesting they had the greatest efficiency of movement. The similar high path lengths in both hands for novices indicate their relatively low level of skill with either hand. The difference between right- and left-hand path lengths in the mid-skill level group likely reflects the improved right-handed technical skills in contrast to the still developing left hand. Further focus on the left hand during simulation training may improve left-handed economy of movement.
