Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 34(4): 378-392, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36789504

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) protocol after surgical therapy of peri-implantitis, combining ultrasonic mechanical debridement and glycine powder air polishing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty subjects diagnosed with peri-implantitis and treated by means of access flap were randomized 6 months later into two different SPIC groups: the test group combined a piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation with a specific implant PEEK tip and glycine powder air polishing, while control group received the same ultrasonic instrumentation together with a rubber cup and a polishing paste. Patients were followed for 12 months, with intermediate SPIC visits every 3 months. Clinical, radiological, microbiological and biochemical outcome variables were registered and calculated. RESULTS: After 12 months of SPIC, probing depths (PD) showed a mean reduction of 0.33 ± 0.11 mm, with significant differences (p < .001) between the test (-0.84 ± 0.43 mm) and the control group (+0.18 ± 0.73 mm). Healthy peri-implant tissues defined by PD <5 mm, absence of BoP (or in only one site around the implant), and no additional bone loss (<0.5 mm), were observed at the final visit in 83% of the implants (87% in the test group and 80% in the control group, p = .255). No adverse events were reported by the subjects participating in the study. CONCLUSIONS: The SPIC protocol including mechanical ultrasonic debridement and glycine powder air-polishing demonstrated significantly better efficacy in terms of PD reductions. A strict SPIC protocol can maintain for 1 year, or even improve, the results obtained after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Peri-Implantitis , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/surgery , Peri-Implantitis/drug therapy , Powders/therapeutic use , Glycine , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
J Clin Med ; 11(16)2022 Aug 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36012939

ABSTRACT

Background: The aim of this study, a prospective case series, was to evaluate the clinical, microbiological, and biochemical impact of the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Methods: Thirty subjects with diagnosis of peri-implantitis were treated following a surgical protocol including access flaps, surface decontamination with ultrasonics and glycine powder air-polishing, and systemic antibiotics. Disease resolution was defined by the composite outcome including presence of probing depths (PD) ≤5 mm, absence of bleeding on probing (BoP)/suppuration, and no additional radiographic bone loss (>1 mm). Regression analysis was used to evaluate the patient-, implant-, and prosthetic-related factors possibly influencing treatment outcomes. Results: Patients were evaluated at 6 months post treatment, demonstrating statistically significant reductions in PD (2.14 ± 1.07 mm) and increase in mucosal recession (1.0 ± 0.77 mm). Plaque, BoP, and suppuration were also reduced by 40.56%, 62.22%, and 7.78%, respectively. Disease resolution was achieved in 56.67% of patients. No significant changes were detected in microbiological parameters except for a significant reduction in proportions of Parvimonas micra. Similarly, the levels of the biomarker interleukin-8 in crevicular fluid were significantly lower at 6 months. Conclusions: The proposed surgical treatment of peri-implantitis demonstrated statistically significant clinical improvements although the impact on microbiological and biochemical parameters was scarce.

3.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 33(11): 1087-1097, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35997508

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This in vitro investigation was aimed to evaluate the cleaning ability of four mechanical devices designed for decontaminating implant surfaces. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-six implants were coated with permanent ink and inserted into 3D-printed resin blocks simulating three different intraosseous defect configurations (types Ib, Ic, and Ie). The four tested mechanical decontamination devices (air-polishing with glycine powder, rotating titanium brush, polyetheretherketone [PEEK]-coated ultrasonic tip, and stainless steel ultrasonic tip) were randomly applied onto the 5 mm exposed implant surface. Standardized photographs were taken from a frontal perspective and with a 30° angle coronally and apically to the implant axis. The area with remnant ink on the implant surface was calculated. RESULTS: Although none of the groups achieved complete ink removal, air-polishing with glycine and titanium brushes demonstrated a higher cleaning ability when compared with ultrasonic devices either with standard or PEEK tips for all three defect configurations. For the three tested models, the best cleaning ability in all groups was shown on implant surfaces without facing an intraosseous wall. Titanium brush was the most effective when the intraosseous walls existed. Cleaning effectiveness diminished in the threads located in the apical third, especially when using air-polishing and ultrasonic devices. CONCLUSIONS: Titanium brushes and air-polishing devices were more effective in removing artificial biofilm using this in vitro model, although their effectiveness was influenced by the presence of the intrabony component.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Titanium , Decontamination , Surface Properties , Glycine
4.
Clin Oral Investig ; 25(4): 2213-2227, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32851532

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the contour and volumetric changes of hard and soft tissues after guided bone regeneration (GBR) using two types of barrier membranes together with a xenogeneic bone substitute in dehiscence-type defects around dental implants. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 8 Beagle dogs, after tooth extraction, two-wall chronified bone defects were developed. Then, implants were placed with a buccal dehiscence defect that was treated with GBR using randomly: (i) deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) covered by a synthetic polylactic membrane (test group), (ii) DBBM plus a porcine natural collagen membrane (positive control) and (iii) defect only covered by the synthetic membrane (negative control group). Outcomes were evaluated at 4 and 12 weeks. Micro-CT was used to evaluate the hard tissue volumetric changes and STL files from digitized cast models were used to measure the soft tissues contour linear changes. RESULTS: Test and positive control groups were superior in terms of volume gain and contour changes when compared with the negative control. Soft tissue changes showed at 4 weeks statistically significant superiority for test and positive control groups compared with negative control. After 12 weeks, the results were superior for test and positive control groups but not statistically significant, although, with a lesser magnitude, the negative control group exhibited gains in both, soft and hard tissues. CONCLUSIONS: Both types of membranes (collagen and synthetic) attained similar outcomes, in terms of hard tissue volume gain and soft tissue contours when used in combination with DBBM CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Synthetic membranes were a valid alternative to the "gold standard" natural collagen membrane for treating dehiscence-type defects around dental implants when used with a xenogeneic bone substitute scaffold.


Subject(s)
Bone Substitutes , Dental Implants , Animals , Bone Regeneration , Bone Substitutes/pharmacology , Cattle , Collagen , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dogs , Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal , Membranes, Artificial , Swine
5.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 30(4): 353-363, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30864234

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To study the early and late bone healing around implants placed according to a flapless immediate (test) or flapped delayed (control) implant surgical protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In eight beagle dogs, immediate and delayed implants were placed. Test and control implants were randomly assigned, and horizontal and vertical bone remodelling, as well as bone-to-implant contact (BIC), were assessed with histology at 2 and 8 weeks. Teeth were used as negative controls. RESULTS: Similar results were attained in the two groups when the vertical resorption of the buccal bone crest was evaluated (approximately 0.5 mm). On the other hand, a marked horizontal buccal bone resorption was observed. Immediate implants attained a thinner buccal bone crest as compared to the delayed implant and the tooth. De novo bone formation on the implant surface appeared to be more pronounced at delayed sites at 2 weeks, whereas at 8 weeks, no difference in BIC was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ridge alterations occurred at both implant placement protocols, with similar limited amounts of vertical buccal bone reduction and a pronounced horizontal bone reduction. The process of horizontal bone remodelling differed between the two surgical protocols.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Tooth Socket , Alveolar Process , Animals , Bone Remodeling , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Dogs , Tooth Extraction
6.
Compend Contin Educ Dent ; 38(8 Suppl): 6-12; quiz 13, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29227111

ABSTRACT

Prevention and treatment of peri-implant diseases have become a key element in modern implant dentistry. The long-term success of implantsupported restorations is not only dependent on the quality and precision of modern implant systems, but on the efficacy of preventive measures for thelong-term maintenance of peri-implant tissues.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants/adverse effects , Peri-Implantitis/therapy , Stomatitis/therapy , Humans , Peri-Implantitis/diagnosis , Peri-Implantitis/prevention & control , Stomatitis/diagnosis , Stomatitis/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...