ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: SNP/phenotype associations are difficult to validate. This comparative study demonstrates significant contribution of candidate genes to the variation of a complex cholesterol phenotype, measured in two general populations by a gene-based approach. METHODS: Independent samples of normolipidemic subjects from two Caucasian populations (371 Swiss and 157 Germans) were selected for a case-control-study (high LDL/low HDL versus low LDL/high HDL) with SNP genotypes as independent factors. We examined locus-specific common SNPs that densely cover the genomic regions of 10 lipid genes. RESULTS: Genotype effects were concordant in both ethnic samples, showing that APOE, ABCA1, CETP, and to a lesser degree LDLR, LIPC, and PLTP explained a substantial part of the genetic variation, whereas LPL was associated in only one sample. APOA1, LCAT, and SRB1 exerted no measurable influence. CONCLUSION: This comparison showed that sets of common SNPs representing candidate regions reproducibly validate significant linkage disequilibrium association with a complex metabolic trait.
Subject(s)
Cholesterol, HDL/genetics , Cholesterol, LDL/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1 , ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters/genetics , Adult , Apolipoproteins E/genetics , Carrier Proteins/genetics , Case-Control Studies , Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins , Female , Germany , Glycoproteins/genetics , Humans , Linkage Disequilibrium , Male , Middle Aged , Phospholipid Transfer Proteins/genetics , Receptors, LDL/genetics , Switzerland , White PeopleABSTRACT
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and derived haplotypes within multiple genes may explain genetic variance in complex traits; however, this hypothesis has not been rigorously tested. In an earlier study we analyzed six genes and have now expanded this investigation to include 13. We studied 250 families including 1054 individuals and measured lipid phenotypes. We focused on low-density cholesterol (LDL), high-density cholesterol (HDL) and their ratio (LDL/HDL). A component analysis of the phenotypic variance relying on a standard genetic model' showed that the genetic variance on LDL explained 26%, on HDL explained 38% and on LDL/HDL explained 28% of the total variance, respectively. Genotyping of 93 SNPs in 13 lipid-relevant genes generated 230 haplotypes. The association of haplotypes in all the genes tested explained a major fraction of the genetic phenotypic variance component. For LDL, the association with haplotypes explained 67% and for HDL 58% of the genetic variance relative to the polygenic background. We conclude that these haplotypes explain most of the genetic variance in LDL, HDL and LDL/HDL in these representative German families. An analysis of the contribution to the genetic variance at each locus showed that APOE (50%), CETP (28%), LIPC (9%), APOB (8%) and LDLR (5%) influenced variation in LDL. LIPC (53%), CETP (25%), ABCA1 (10%), LPL (6%) and LDLR (6%) influenced the HDL variance. The LDL/HDL ratio was primarily influenced by APOE (36%), CETP (27%) and LIPC (31%). This expanded analysis substantially increases the explanation of genetic variance on these complex traits.
