Azithromycin compared with amoxicillin in the treatment of erythema migrans. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether azithromycin or amoxicillin is more efficacious for the treatment of erythema migrans skin lesions, which are characteristic of Lyme disease. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study. Acute manifestations and sequelae were assessed using a standardized format. Baseline clinical characteristics and response were correlated with serologic results. Patients were followed for 180 days. SETTING: 12 outpatient centers in eight states. PATIENTS: 246 adult patients with erythema migrans lesions at least 5 cm in diameter were enrolled and were stratified by the presence of flu-like symptoms (such as fever, chills, headache, malaise, fatigue, arthralgias, and myalgias) before randomization. INTERVENTION: Oral treatment with either amoxicillin, 500 mg three times daily for 20 days, or azithromycin, 500 mg once daily for 7 days. Patients who received azithromycin also received a dummy placebo so that the dosing schedules were identical. RESULTS: Of 217 evaluable patients, those treated with amoxicillin were significantly more likely than those treated with azithromycin to achieve complete resolution of disease at day 20, the end of therapy (88% compared with 76%; P=0.024). More azithromycin recipients (16%) than amoxicillin recipients (4%) had relapse (P=0.005). A partial response at day 20 was highly predictive of relapse (27% of partial responders had relapse compared with 6% of complete responders; P<0.001). For patients treated with azithromycin, development of an antibody response increased the possibility of achieving a complete response (81% of seropositive patients achieved a complete response compared with 60% of seronegative patients; P=0.043). Patients with multiple erythema migrans lesions were more likely than patients with single erythema migrans lesions (P<0.001) to have a positive antibody titer at baseline (63% compared with 17% for IgM; 39% compared with 16% for IgG). Fifty-seven percent of patients who had relapse were seronegative at the time of relapse. CONCLUSIONS: A 20-day course of amoxicillin was found to be an effective regimen for erythema migrans. Most patients were seronegative for Borrelia burgdorferi at the time of presentation with erythema migrans (65%) and at the time of relapse (57%).

Comparison of cefuroxime axetil and doxycycline in treatment of patients with early Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans.

A randomized, multicenter, investigator-blinded clinical trial was undertaken in order to compare the efficacies of cefuroxime axetil and doxycycline in the treatment of patients with Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans. A total of 232 patients with physician-documented erythema migrans were treated orally for 20 days with either cefuroxime axetil, 500 mg twice daily (119 patients), or doxycycline, 100 mg three times daily (113 patients), and clinical evaluations were conducted during treatment (8 to 12 days) and at 1 to 5 days and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttreatment. Patients were assessed as to the resolution of erythema migrans and of the signs and symptoms related to early Lyme disease as well as to the prevention of late Lyme disease. A satisfactory clinical outcome (success or improvement) was achieved in 90 of 100 (90%) evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil and in 89 of 94 (95%) patients treated with doxycycline (difference, -5%; 95% confidence interval, -12 to 3%). Patients with paresthesia, arthralgia, or irritability at enrollment were at higher risk for an unsatisfactory clinical outcome at 1 month posttreatment. Of the patients with satisfactory outcomes at 1 month posttreatment who were evaluable at 1 year posttreatment, a satisfactory outcome was achieved in 62 of 65 (95%) and in 53 of 53 (100%) patients treated with cefuroxime axetil and doxycycline, respectively (difference, -5%; 95% confidence interval, -10 to 4%). Twenty-eight percent of patients treated with doxycycline and 17% of those treated with cefuroxime axetil had one or more drug-related adverse events (P = 0.041). Doxycycline was associated with more photosensitivity reactions (6% compared with 0% for patients treated with cefuroxime axetil; P=0.006), and cefuroxime axetil was associated with more cases of diarrhea (5% compared with 0% for patients treated with doxycycline; P=0.030). Jarisch-Herxheimer reactions occurred in 12% of the patients in each treatment group. In summary, cefuroxime axetil is well tolerated and appears to be equally as effective as doxycycline in the treatment of early Lyme disease and in preventing the subsequent development of late Lyme disease.

Persistence of serum antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in patients treated for Lyme disease.

To determine if antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi persist after antibiotic treatment, we recalled 32 patients with Lyme disease from a primary care practice a mean of 16 months after treatment and analyzed initial and follow-up serum samples by ELISA and immunoblot assays. Of the eight patients whose initial serum specimens were positive for IgM antibody by ELISA, three had positive titers of IgM antibody at follow-up; of the 23 patients whose initial serum specimens were positive for IgG antibody by ELISA, 19 had positive titers of IgG at follow-up. Of the five patients whose initial serum specimens were positive for IgM antibody by immunoblot, two had positive titers of IgM antibody at follow-up; of the 30 patients whose initial serum specimens were positive for IgG antibody by immunoblot, 29 had positive titers of IgG antibody at follow-up. The bands on the IgG immunoblot remained remarkably constant during the period from analysis of the initial specimen to that of the follow-up specimen. Nine of the 32 patients had persistent or recurrent symptoms, and ELISA and immunoblot were not helpful for identifying these nine patients.

Comparison of cefuroxime axetil and doxycycline in the treatment of early Lyme disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of cefuroxime axetil and doxycycline in the treatment of patients with Lyme disease associated with erythema migrans. DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, investigator-blinded clinical trial with clinical evaluations during treatment (8 to 12 days) and at 1 to 5 days and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment. SETTING: Three university referral centers and one private practice. PATIENTS: A total of 123 patients with physician-documented erythema migrans. INTERVENTION: Patients were treated orally for 20 days with either cefuroxime axetil, 500 mg twice daily (63 patients), or doxycycline, 100 mg three times daily (60 patients). MEASUREMENTS: Resolution of erythema migrans and of signs and symptoms related to early Lyme disease as well as prevention of late Lyme disease. RESULTS: A satisfactory clinical outcome (success or improvement) was achieved in 51 of 55 (93%) evaluable patients treated with cefuroxime axetil and in 45 of 51 (88%) patients treated with doxycycline (difference, 5%, 95% Cl, -5% to 14%). The only complication at 1 month post-treatment was Lyme arthritis in one patient who received doxycycline. Of the patients with satisfactory outcomes at 1 month post-treatment who were evaluable at 1 year post-treatment, a satisfactory outcome was achieved in 43 of 48 (90%) and in 35 of 38 (92%) patients treated with cefuroxime axetil and doxycycline, respectively (difference, -2%; Cl, -12% to 7%). Lyme arthritis did not develop in any patient after 1 month post-treatment, whereas peripheral neuropathy was suspected in one patient treated with cefuroxime axetil. Thirty percent of patients treated with cefuroxime axetil and 32% of those treated with doxycycline had one or more drug-related adverse events. Doxycycline was associated with more photo-sensitivity reactions (15% compared with 0%; P = 0.001) and cefuroxime axetil with more diarrhea (21% compared with 7%; P = 0.035) and Jarisch-Herxheimer reactions (29% compared with 8%; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Cefuroxime axetil is well tolerated and appears to be equally as effective as doxycycline in the treating of early Lyme disease and in preventing the subsequent development of late Lyme disease.

Treatment of early Lyme disease.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of azithromycin, amoxicillin/probenecid, and doxycycline for the treatment of early Lyme disease, to identify risk factors for treatment failure, and to describe the serologic response in treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients with erythema migrans and two patients with flu-like symptoms alone and fourfold changes in antibody titers to Borrelia burgdorferi were randomized to receive (1) oral azithromycin, 500 mg on the first day followed by 250 mg once a day for 4 days; (2) oral amoxicillin 500 mg and probenecid 500 mg, three times a day for each for 10 days; or (3) doxcycline, 100 mg twice a day for 10 days. If symptoms were still present at 10 days, treatment was extended with amoxicillin/probenecid or doxycycline for 10 more days. Evaluations were done at study entry and 10, 30, and 180 days later. RESULTS: Three of the patients who initially had symptoms suggestive of spread of the spirochete to the nervous system, one from each antibiotic treatment group, subsequently developed neurologic abnormalities, but symptoms in the other 54 patients resolved within 3 to 30 days after study entry. Six of the 19 patients (32%) (95% confidence interval, 13% to 57%) given amoxicillin/probenecid developed a drug eruption, whereas none of the patients given azithromycin or doxycycline had this complication. The presence of dysesthesias at study entry was the only risk factor significantly associated with treatment failure (p less than 0.001). By convalescence, 72% of the patients were seropositive, and 56% still had detectable IgM responses to the spirochete 6 months later. CONCLUSIONS: The three antibiotic regimens tested in this study were generally effective for the treatment of early Lyme disease, but the regimens differ in the frequency of side effects and in ease of administration.

Diagnosis of Lyme disease based on dermatologic manifestations.

Lyme disease, or Lyme borreliosis, is an infection caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi, which is most commonly transmitted to humans by a tick bite. Characterized by early and late phases, Lyme disease is a multisystem illness involving the skin, heart, joints, and nervous system. Diagnosis is based predominantly on clinical manifestations, the most specific being dermatologic. Thus, recognizing the dermatologic manifestations of Lyme disease is important for diagnosis and institution of appropriate, effective therapy. Approximately 75% of patients with Lyme disease present with the pathognomonic skin lesion erythema migrans, an expanding erythematous lesion. During early infection, secondary erythema migrans lesions or Borrelia lymphocytoma may occur. Borrelia lymphocytoma commonly presents as an erythematous nodule on the ear lobe or nipple. During late infection, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans, an erythematous, atrophic plaque unique to Lyme disease may appear; it has been described in about 10% of patients with Lyme disease in Europe. Fibrotic nodules associated with acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans as well as other sclerotic and atrophic lesions, such as morphea, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus, anetoderma, and atrophoderma of Pasini and Pierini, have been seen late in the course of Lyme disease. In a few cases, other sclerodermatous lesions, such as eosinophilic fasciitis and progressive facial hemiatrophy, have been linked to B. burgdorferi infection. We review the cutaneous lesions associated with Lyme disease.

Serologic tests for Lyme disease. Interlaboratory variability.

The serologic test for the detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi is the most frequently used laboratory method for the diagnosis of Lyme disease. However, the insensitivity of the assays and the interlaboratory variability are frequent problems. To determine the extent of this variability, one aliquot of serum from each of nine patients with a history of Lyme disease was sent to nine reference laboratories, including national, university, state, and local hospital laboratories. A second aliquot of the original serum was submitted 2 weeks later. Wide variability among laboratories was observed, ranging from a university laboratory that detected antibody to B burgdorferi (IgG or IgM) in 18 of 18 specimens, to a state laboratory that detected antibody in only 8 of 18 specimens. Detection of IgM specific antibodies showed similar variability (range, 2 to 10 of 18). There were eight instances of a fourfold or greater change in titer between the aliquots sent 2 weeks apart, although only three of these were an increase in titer. These results indicate the need for standardization of the assays and the availability of national reference material. It is recommended that the results of serologic testing should not be relied on as the sole criteria in making the diagnosis of Lyme disease.