ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm results of the initial phase of off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery adoption in a single surgical unit, assessing the impact of procedural volume. METHODS: Study participants were 312 patients who underwent OPCAB during the period between August 2000 and January 2005 at S. Croce Hospital. Of these patients, 126 patients with an indication selected for comorbidities or 1-vessel disease underwent OPCAB performed by 4 low-volume surgeons, and 186 unselected patients underwent OPCAB performed by a single high-volume surgeon. RESULTS: OPCAB performed by low-volume surgeons was associated with less complete revascularization and less arterial conduit use. Early result analysis showed a low rate of in-hospital or 30-day adverse events. The 5-year survival was 0.88 (0.02 SE). OPCAB performance by a high-volume surgeon and complete revascularization were shown have a protective effect for midterm major adverse cardiac events (respectively, hazard ratio = 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.74 and hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.15-0.73). CONCLUSION: Our study on the initial phase of OPCAB adoption suggests a benefit on midterm outcome from surgery performed by a high-volume surgeon.
Subject(s)
Angina, Unstable/mortality , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Heart Failure/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Stroke/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angina, Unstable/surgery , Cause of Death , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Failure/surgery , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Reoperation/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to evaluate the early and mid-term off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) results in a single surgical unit, assessing the impact of completeness of revascularization. METHODS: Three hundred and twelve patients underwent OPCAB between August 2000 and January 2005. In-hospital data were collected prospectively for all patients undergoing OPCAB. Complete revascularization (CR) was derived by comparing significantly stenotic vessels at cardiac catheterization with surgically grafted coronary vessels. Grafting of all the significantly stenotic coronary vessels was considered CR. In-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with CR and incomplete revascularization (IR). A multivariate analysis based on the Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed. RESULTS: Patients receiving IR (105 patients, 43.7%) presented a worse preoperative risk profile then those having CR (mean Euroscore 6.8 +/- 2.9 vs. 4.3 +/- 2.8, p < 0.0001). IR was not associated with a higher incidence of early adverse events. Five-year freedom from death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 0.88 (0.02 SE) and 0.86 (0.03 SE), respectively. Complete revascularization was protective for mid-term unstable angina recurrence [heart rate (HR) = 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 0.58], acute myocardial infarction (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.73), all-cause repeat revascularization (HR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.90), and MACE (HR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that, although incomplete revascularization may not result in increased short-term morbidity and mortality, it increases the incidence of mid-term MACE.
