Kinematic and mechanical comparisons of lumbar hybrid fixation using Dynesys and Cosmic systems.

STUDY DESIGN: The biomechanical effects of Dynesys and Cosmic fixators on transition and adjacent segments were evaluated using the finite-element method. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the load-transferring mechanisms of 2 dynamic fixators and the fixator-induced effects on the junctional problem of the adjacent segments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The mobility and flexibility of Dynesys screw-spacer and Cosmic screw-hinge joints preserve motion and share loads for the transition segment. However, the differences in tissue responses and fixator mechanisms among these 2 fixators have not been investigated extensively. METHODS: A lumbosacral model from L1 to S1 levels was developed and subjected to muscular contraction, ligamentous interconnection, compressive force, and trunk moment. A static fixator was instrumented at the moderately degenerative L4-L5 segment to serve as a comparison baseline. Subsequently, the 2 fixators were instrumented at the mildly degenerative L3-L4 segment. The tissue responses of the adjacent segments and the load transmission at the screw-spacer and bone-screw interfaces were compared. RESULTS: Both systems show the ability to protect the transition segment but deteriorate the adjacent segments. The screw-hinge joint and the stiffer rod of the Cosmic system significantly constrained the motion pattern of the transition segment. Comparatively, the Dynesys screw-spacer interfaces make contact with and depart from each other during motion; thus providing higher mobility to the transition segment. However, the highly stressed distribution at the Cosmic bone-screw causes the screw and hinge prone to pullout and fatigue failures. CONCLUSION: Cosmic fixation can better protect the disc and facet joint of the transition segment than can the Dynesys. However, the screw-hinge joint strictly constrains intersegmental motion and deteriorates the junctional problem. The Cosmic system can be chosen to treat more severely degenerative transition segments. With higher flexibility, the Dynesys system is recommended for the transition segment that is healthy or mildly degenerative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Pretension effects of the Dynesys cord on the tissue responses and screw-spacer behaviors of the lumbosacral construct with hybrid fixation.

STUDY DESIGN: The pretension of the Dynesys cord was varied to evaluate its effects on both tissue responses and screw-spacer behaviors by the finite-element method. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide detailed information about the motion-preserving and load-shielding mechanisms of the Dynesys screw-spacer joint. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Intuitively, higher cord pretension aims to ensure the occurrence of screw-spacer contact, thus making the spacer the transmitter of the vertebral loads. However, detailed investigations of the cord-pretension effects have not yet been carried out. METHODS.: Using a validated lumbosacral model, the moderately degenerative L4-L5 segment was instrumented by a static fixator and the Dynesys fixator was further used to bridge a mildly degenerative L3-L4 segment. The pre-tended cord was modeled as an elastic spring with 0- and 300-N pretensions. The disc range-of-motion, disc stress, facet force, bone-screw stress, and screw-spacer force were chosen as comparison indices. RESULTS.: At the transition and adjacent segments, the range-of-motion differences between the 2 pretensions were 7.7% and 2.0% on average, respectively. The mechanical differences at the transition and adjacent segments were 9.0% and 5.2% (disc stress) and 9.4% and 9.1% (facet force), respectively. The results indicated that the cord pretension has a minor effect on the adjacent segments in comparison with the transition segment. However, the stress at the screw hub and force of the screw-spacer contact of the 300-N pretension were increased by 33.7% and 316.5% on average than without pretension, respectively. CONCLUSION: The moment arm from the screw-cord center to the fulcrum is significantly less than that of vertebral loads. This leads to the minor effect of increasing the cord pretension on the responses of the adjacent segments. However, the cord pretension can significantly affect both screw-spacer force and bone-screw stress. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.