The World Health Organization classification of pancreaticobiliary cytopathology stratifies risk of malignancy and outcome for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently published a classification for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytopathology with differences compared to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) classification. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected from pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations from 2014 to 2017 at a pancreatic cancer center. Absolute risk of malignancy (AROM), relative risk (to benign), performance characteristics, and overall survival were calculated for the entire cohort with comparison of cysts and solid lesions. RESULTS: In total, 2562 cases were included: 16% cyst (n = 411) and 84% solid (n = 2151). The histologic confirmation rate was 43% (n = 1101) and the median follow-up (for benign) was 56 months. For WHO I-VII, overall AROM (%) was 23, 22, 62, 13, 65, 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 13, 38, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 29, 70, 15, 100, 99, and 100. For PSC I-VI, overall AROM (%) was 23, 29, 64, 0 (IVa), 60 (IVb), 97, and 100; cyst AROM was 7, 0, 19, 0, 21, 78, and 100; and solid AROM was 50, 35, 73, 0, 92, 99, and 100. The difference in relative risk for a cyst (vs. solid) overall was 0.38 for WHO and 0.26 for PSC. WHO and PSC categories showed stratification for the probability of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Cystic versus solid lesion type can dramatically affect AROM, particularly for nondiagnostic (I), benign (II), atypical (III), and WHO V categories. WHO IV conveys a similarly low AROM for cystic and solid types. Both classifications stratify the probability of overall survival, including the newly introduced categories WHO IV and WHO V.

Re-transplantation for Hepatic Artery Thrombosis: A National Perspective.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is a major complication after liver transplantation that commonly requires re-transplantation. METHODS: We queried the UNOS dataset for all patients transplanted between 1995 and 2015 for HAT. RESULTS: We identified 623 patients who underwent re-transplantation for HAT with a mean age of 51.25 + 10.4 years. The mean BMI was 26.72 kg/m2, and mean MELD score was 19.62 + 9.09. There was a higher proportion of male patients, with higher prevalence of pre-transplant portal vein thrombosis (7.4 vs. 5.4%, p = 0.04), lower incidence of hepatitis C virus infection (29.5 vs. 35.8%, p = 0.002), and shorter waiting time (61 vs. 111 days, p = 0.001) in the HAT group compared to those re-transplanted for other indications. The perioperative 90-day mortality was lower in patients re-transplanted for HAT (16 vs. 20%, p = 0.02). Patients undergoing re-transplantation for HAT had 13% decreased graft survival and 13% increased long-term survival. After case-control matched analysis, graft survival and patient survival were significantly better in the HAT group. Late re-transplantation (>30 days) for HAT was linked to decreased graft and patient survival when compared to those undergoing early re-transplantation (within 30 days). CONCLUSIONS: Improved outcomes were seen in patients undergoing re-transplantation for HAT compared to patients who underwent re-transplantation for other indications. Those re-transplanted late after HAT (>30 days) were associated with worse outcomes when compared to early re-transplantation.