A Multicenter Study on Long-Term Outcomes After Lung Transplantation Comparing Donation After Circulatory Death and Donation After Brain Death.

The implementation of donation after circulatory death category 3 (DCD3) was one of the attempts to reduce the gap between supply and demand of donor lungs. In the Netherlands, the total number of potential lung donors was greatly increased by the availability of DCD3 lungs in addition to the initial standard use of donation after brain death (DBD) lungs. From the three lung transplant centers in the Netherlands, 130 DCD3 recipients were one-to-one nearest neighbor propensity score matched with 130 DBD recipients. The primary end points were primary graft dysfunction (PGD), posttransplant lung function, freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and overall survival. PGD did not differ between the groups. Posttransplant lung function was comparable after bilateral lung transplantation, but seemed worse after DCD3 single lung transplantation. The incidence of CLAD (p = 0.17) nor the freedom from CLAD (p = 0.36) nor the overall survival (p = 0.40) were significantly different between both groups. The presented multicenter results are derived from a national context where one third of the lung transplantations are performed with DCD3 lungs. We conclude that the long-term outcome after lung transplantation with DCD3 donors is similar to that of DBD donors and that DCD3 donation can substantially enlarge the donor pool.

Effective Prolonged Therapy with Voriconazole in a Lung Transplant Recipient with Spondylodiscitis Induced by Scedosporium apiospermum.

Scedosporium/Pseudallescheria species are frequently seen in cystic fibrosis patients. However, disseminated forms after lung transplantation in these patients are rarely seen, but often with poor outcome. In this case report we describe a lung transplant recipient with cystic fibrosis who developed a spondylodiscitis that was caused by Scedosporium apiospermum. The patient was treated with anti-fungal treatment by voriconazole for over three years with a clinical good response and without the need for surgical intervention. To our opinion this is the first anti-fungal treated case of invasive disease caused by Scedosporium/Pseudallescheria in a cystic fibrosis (CF) patient who underwent lung transplantation that survived.

Prolonged protection of the new inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone furoate against AMP hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Single-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) induce direct anti-inflammatory effects in asthma thereby improving airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR). A novel enhanced-affinity ICS, fluticasone furoate (FF), demonstrated a prolonged duration of action in vitro. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and duration of action of a single dose of FF by studying protection against AHR to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) and effects on exhaled nitric oxide (eNO). METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-way crossover study (FFA10026) was performed in 24 patients with allergic asthma (mean age 32.8 years, FEV(1) ≥ 70% predicted and PC(20) AMP ≤ 50 mg/ml). Each subject received a single dose of FF 1000 µg, fluticasone proprionate (FP) 1000 µg, or placebo at 2 (FF only), 14 or 26 h prior to AMP challenge and eNO measurement. RESULTS: FF significantly improved PC(20) AMP compared to placebo, the difference in doubling concentrations being 2.18 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-3.23), 1.54 (0.48-2.59), and 1.30 (0.26-2.34) at 2, 14 and 26 h. FP improved PC(20) AMP significantly at 14 h compared to placebo, but not at the 26-hour time point, the difference in doubling concentrations being 1.72 (0.70-2.75) and 0.33 (-0.69-1.34). There was no significant effect on eNO after either FF or FP at all time points. FF was well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The new inhaled corticosteroid FF, but not FP, demonstrates prolonged protection up to 26 h against AHR to AMP in asthma patients.

Allergen inhalation decreases adenosine receptor expression in sputum and blood of asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine is a signalling nucleoside that has been proposed to contribute to the pathogenesis of asthma. Adenosine is produced in inflammatory environments and acts via adenosine receptors (A(1)R, A(2A)R, A(2B)R, and A(3)R) expressed by a wide variety of cells, resulting in pro- and anti-inflammatory effects. OBJECTIVE: To compare AR expression in asthma patients and healthy subjects, and to assess the effect of allergen challenge on AR expression of inflammatory cells and on cytokines in peripheral blood and sputum in asthma. METHODS: Asthma patients underwent an allergen challenge, and blood and induced sputum samples were taken before and 24 h after allergen challenge to study inflammatory cells numbers, AR expression and cytokine production. Blood and sputum were investigated at one time point in healthy subjects. AR expression was measured by flow cytometry (blood) or on cytospins using immunocytochemistry (sputum). Cytokines (luminex, ELISA) and adenosine (HPLC) were measured in sputum supernatant. RESULTS: The percentage of A(2B)R expressing neutrophils in sputum was lower in asthma patients than in healthy subjects (P = 0.016). Allergen challenge decreased A(1)R and A(2A)R expression on neutrophils and A(1)R expression on T cells in peripheral blood (all P < 0.05). Allergen challenge increased IL-8 levels and eosinophil numbers (P < 0.05), whereas it decreased thymic stromal lymphopoietin levels and the percentage of A(1)R expressing macrophages in induced sputum (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Allergen challenge has a down-regulatory effect on AR expression in asthma, suggesting a contribution of adenosine-related effector mechanisms in the pathophysiology.

Effect of an inhaled adenosine A2A agonist on the allergen-induced late asthmatic response.

BACKGROUND: Adenosine receptor activation is suggested to play a role in asthmatic airway inflammation. Inhibition of adenosine receptors may have an effect on the late asthmatic response (LAR) after allergen inhalation and this mechanism could offer a potential new treatment in asthma. METHODS: We evaluated the effect of an inhaled adenosine-(2A) (A(2A))-receptor agonist (GW328267X), 25 microg, in 15 nonsmoking atopic asthmatics who underwent an inhaled allergen challenge following twice daily treatment for 1 week in a double-blind, placebo- and fluticasone propionate (250 microg) controlled study. RESULTS: In contrast to fluticasone, treatment with the A(2A)-receptor agonist neither significantly protect against the allergen-induced early and late asthmatic reaction, nor the accompanying inflammatory response as measured by sputum total cell counts, number of EG2+ cells, and the concentration of interleukin-8 and eosinophil cationic protein. CONCLUSION: The inhaled A(2A)-receptor agonist, GW328267X, 25 microg does not affect the allergen-induced LAR or the associated inflammatory response in asthma.

The effect of a single inhaled dose of a VLA-4 antagonist on allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma.

Adhesion molecule very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) is implicated in the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells in asthma, including eosinophils, T cells and mast cells. VLA-4 antagonists have been proposed as a new anti-inflammatory treatment modality for asthma. Therefore, we investigated whether a single inhaled dose of VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X could protect against allergen-induced changes in airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma. We performed a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study with single inhaled doses of 3 mg of GW559090X, 500 microg of fluticasone propionate (FP) or placebo in 15 patients with mild intermittent asthma, controlled with short-acting beta(2)-agonists only. All patients developed a late asthmatic response (LAR) after allergen inhalation during screening. Study medication was administered 30 min prior to allergen challenge. Pre-dose and 24 h post-dose PC20 methacholine and levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) were determined. At the given dose, VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X did not attenuate the early asthmatic response (EAR) when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 27.2+/-3.7 and 21.9+/-3.0 respectively (P=0.33); nor the LAR: mean AUC3-8 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 98.8+/-12.9 and 94.8+/-6.8 respectively (P=0.84). However, pretreatment with FP did attenuate both EAR and LAR when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h11.6+/-3.3 (P=0.024) and mean AUC3-8 h 6.3+/-7.6 (P<0.001). None of these treatments had an effect on allergen-induced changes in airway hyper-responsiveness or eNO levels. These findings suggest that VLA-4 may not play a major role in allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation in asthma.

Systemic eosinophil response induced by respiratory syncytial virus.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of lower respiratory tract disease (LRTD) in infants. Eosinophils have been suggested to play a role in the disease pathogenesis of LRTD. Inflammation can induce functional and morphological alterations of peripheral blood granulocytes. In patients with RSV LRTD, we aimed to investigate the eosinophil activation status by analysing surface markers. In vitro stimulation of eosinophils with cytokines leads to up-regulation of CD11b and priming markers recognized by the recently developed priming markers A17 and A27, whereas interleukin (IL)-5Ralpha is being down-regulated. In 51 patients and 10 controls we examined the expression of these surface markers on eosinophils in moderate to severe RSV-induced LRTD patients at the time of admission and 6 weeks later during the convalescence phase. RSV-patients were characterized by a higher eosinophil CD11b expression compared to controls. Although basal A17 and A27 expression was not increased, we observed a significantly higher expression of these priming epitopes on N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP)-stimulated cells of RSV patients compared with cells of controls, indicative of prior in vivo priming. Furthermore, IL-5Ralpha expression was down-regulated on peripheral blood eosinophils of these patients. Follow-up blood samples showed normalization of all markers but CD11b, which was persistently increased. Utilizing cellular markers, we observed that peripheral blood eosinophils from infants with RSV LRTD are in a more activated state compared to eosinophils of controls, which normalizes only partially during convalescence.

Duration of effect of single-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate on AMP-induced bronchoconstriction.

Airway hyperresponsiveness induced by adenosine-5'-monophosphate (AMP) is regarded as a reliable model for allergic asthma and for the evaluation of anti-asthmatic drugs. Single-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are known to be protective in this model, but the duration of action of these drugs in this model has never been studied. The duration of ICS protection was determined by administration of single-dose fluticasone propionate (FP; 1,000 micrograms) up to 26 h before AMP challenge. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study was performed in 13 mild asthmatics (mean +/- SD predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 98 +/- 7%). Each subject received placebo and FP (at 26, 14 or 2 h prior to the AMP challenge). Furthermore, the marker exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) was studied after administration at these time points to investigate whether eNO also demonstrates the duration of action of ICS. The doubling concentrations difference (DCD) of AMP causing a 20% fall in FEV1, when FP was administered 26, 14 or 2 h prior to challenge, was significantly increased as compared with placebo: DCD (95% confidence interval) at 26 h, 0.73 (0.20-1.26), p = 0.008; 14 h, 1.50 (0.99-2.01), p < 0.001; and 2 h, 2.89 (2.37-3.40), p < 0.001. However, eNO was not significantly affected at these time points. In conclusion, a single dose of 1,000 micrograms inhaled fluticasone propionate protects against adenosine-5'-monophosphate airway hyperresponsiveness up to 26 h after dosing. This study suggests that adenosine-5'-monophosphate challenge can be used as a sensitive marker to study the duration of action of inhaled corticosteroids.