ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDIn 2020, Mexico experienced one of the highest rates of excess mortality globally. However, the extent to which non-COVID deaths contributed to excess mortality, its regional characterization, and the association between municipal-and individual-level sociodemographic inequality has not been characterized. METHODSWe conducted a retrospective municipal an individual-level study using death certificate data in Mexico from 2016-2020. We analyzed mortality related to COVID-19 and to non-COVID-19 causes using ICD-10 codes to identify cause-specific mortality. Excess mortality was estimated as the increase in deaths in 2020 compared to the average of 2016-2019, disaggregated by primary cause of death, death setting (in-hospital and out-of-hospital) and geographical location. We evaluated correlates of non-COVID-19 mortality at the individual level using mixed effects logistic regression and correlates of non-COVID-19 excess mortality in 2020 at the municipal level using negative binomial regression. RESULTSWe identified 1,069,174 deaths in 2020 (833.5 per 100,000 inhabitants), which was 49% higher compared to the 2016-2019 average (557.38 per 100,000 inhabitants). Overall excess mortality (276.11 deaths per 100,000 inhabitants) was attributable in 76.1% to COVID-19; however, non-COVID-19 causes comprised one-fifth of excess deaths. COVID-19 deaths occurred primarily in-hospital, while excess non-COVID-19 deaths decreased in this setting and increased out-of-hospital. Excess non-COVID-19 mortality displayed geographical heterogeneity linked to sociodemographic inequalities with clustering in states in southern Mexico. Municipal-level predictors of non-COVID-19 excess mortality included levels of social security coverage, higher rates of COVID-19 hospitalization, and social marginalization. At the individual level, lower educational attainment, blue collar workers, and lack of medical care assistance were associated with non-COVID-19 mortality during 2020. CONCLUSIONNon-COVID-19 causes of death, largely chronic cardiometabolic conditions, comprised up to one-fifth of excess deaths in Mexico during 2020. Non-COVID-19 excess deaths occurred disproportionately out-of-hospital and were associated with both individual-and municipal-level sociodemographic inequalities. These findings should prompt an urgent call to action to improve healthcare coverage and access to reduce health and sociodemographic inequalities in Mexico to reduce preventable mortality in situations which increase the stress of healthcare systems, including the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDVaccination has been effective in ameliorating the impact of COVID-19. However, estimation of vaccine effectiveness (VE) is still unavailable for some widely used vaccines and underrepresented groups. Here, we report on the effectiveness of a nation-wide COVID-19 vaccination program in Mexico. METHODSWe used a test-negative design within a national COVID-19 surveillance system to assess VE of the BNT162b2, mRNA-12732, Gam-COVID-Vac, Ad5-nCoV, Ad26.COV2.S, ChAdOx1 and CoronaVac vaccines, against SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 related hospitalization and death for adults [≥]18 years in Mexico. VE was estimated using Cox proportional hazard models considering time-varying vaccination status in partial and fully vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated adults, adjusted by age, sex, comorbidities and municipality. We also estimated VE for adults [≥]60 years, for cases with diabetes and comparing periods with predominance of variants B.1.1.519 and B.1.617.2. RESULTSWe assessed 793,487 vaccinated compared to 4,792,338 unvaccinated adults between December 24th, 2020, and September 27th, 2021. VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection was highest for fully vaccinated individuals with mRNA-12732 (91.5%, 95%CI 90.3-92.4) and Ad26.COV2.S (82.2%, 95%CI 81.4-82.9), whereas for COVID-19 related hospitalization were BNT162b2 (84.3%, 95%CI 83.6-84.9) and Gam-COVID-Vac (81.4% 95%CI 79.5-83.1) and for mortality BNT162b2 (89.8%, 95%CI 89.2-90.2) and mRNA-12732 (93.5%, 95%CI 86.0-97.0). VE for all evaluated vaccines was reduced for adults [≥]60 years, people with diabetes, and in periods of Delta variant predominance. CONCLUSIONSAll evaluated vaccines were effective against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 related hospitalization and death. Mass vaccination campaigns with multiple vaccine products are feasible and effective to maximize vaccination coverage.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDExcess all-cause mortality rates in Mexico in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic were among the highest globally. Recent reports suggest that diabetes-related deaths were also higher, but the contribution of diabetes as a cause of excess mortality in Mexico during 2020 compared to prior years has not yet been characterized. METHODSWe conducted a retrospective, state-level study using national death registries from Mexican adults [≥]20 years for the 2017-2020 period. Diabetes-related deaths were classified using ICD-10 codes that listed diabetes as the primary cause of death, excluding certificates which listed COVID-19 as a cause of death. Excess mortality was estimated as the increase in diabetes-related mortality in 2020 compared to average rates in 2017-2019. Analyses were stratified by diabetes type, diabetes-related complication, and in-hospital vs. out-of-hospital death. We evaluated the geographic distribution of diabetes-related excess mortality and its socio-demographic and epidemiologic correlates using spatial analyses and negative binomial regression models. RESULTSWe identified 148,437 diabetes-related deaths in 2020 (177/100,000 inhabitants), 41.6% higher than the average for 2017-2019, with the excess occurring after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. In-hospital diabetes-related deaths decreased by 17.8% in 2020 compared to 2017-2019, whereas out-of-hospital deaths increased by 89.4%. Most deaths were attributable to type 2 diabetes and type 1 diabetes (129.7 and 4.0/100,000 population). Diabetes-related emergencies as contributing causes of death also increased in 2020 compared to 2017-2019 for hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (128%), and ketoacidosis (116%). Diabetes-related excess mortality clustered in southern Mexico and was highest in states with higher social lag, higher rates of COVID-19 hospitalization, and higher prevalence of HbA1c [≥]7.5%. INTERPRETATIONDiabetes-related mortality increased among Mexican adults by 41.6% in 2020 after the onset of the pandemic compared to 2017-2019, largely attributable to type 2 diabetes. Excess diabetes-related deaths occurred disproportionately out-of-hospital, clustered in southern Mexico, and were associated with higher state-level marginalization, rates of COVID-19 hospitalizations, and higher prevalence of suboptimal glycemic control. Urgent policies to mitigate mortality due to diabetes in Mexico are needed, particularly given the ongoing challenges in caring for people with diabetes posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSWe searched PubMed and Google Scholar for research articles published up to February 15, 2022, using the terms [("diabetes-related mortality" OR ("excess mortality" AND "diabetes"))]. No language restriction was applied. This search revealed few international studies evaluating nationwide diabetes-related mortality in general. In Mexico, only one unpublished study evaluated diabetes-related mortality up to 2019. We identified no studies which evaluated diabetes-related excess mortality in Mexico or elsewhere during 2020 or which explored correlates of diabetes-related excess mortality in 2020. Added value of this studyThis is the first report and characterization of an excess in diabetes-related mortality in Mexico during 2020 compared to recent years. Diabetes as a primary cause of death in Mexico was higher in 2020 compared to 2017-2019, particularly for people living with type 2 diabetes, starting in March 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared to the 2017-2019 period, most of these excess deaths occurred out of hospital, with a concurrent decrease in in-hospital diabetes-related mortality. Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state and ketoacidosis as primary causes of diabetes-related deaths also increased in 2020 compared to prior years. Our study also identified substantial geographic variation in diabetes-related excess mortality in Mexico, with southern, poorer States bearing a disproportionate burden. Finally, we report that diabetes-related excess mortality was associated with higher marginalization, suboptimal glycemic control, and higher rates of COVID-19 hospitalization, which were clustered in southern Mexico. Implications of the available evidenceReadily treatable, high morbidity diabetes-related conditions were likely untreated due to the constraints of the health care system during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to diabetes-related excess mortality. This is a problem for Mexico, but it is likely to be generalizable to other countries and other conditions, as seen even in high-income countries. Given the ongoing challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare systems, policies that can strengthen care for diabetes and other chronic conditions are urgently needed to mitigate the dramatic rise in diabetes-related mortality occurring in the out-of-hospital setting and its disproportionate burden on populations with high levels of marginalization.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundPost-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is a multi-system disease comprising persistent symptomatology after the acute phase of infection. Long-term PACS effects significantly impact patient outcomes, but their incidence remains uncharacterized due to high heterogeneity between studies. Therefore, we aimed to summarize published data on PACS, characterizing the clinical presentation, prevalence, and modifiers of prevalence estimates. MethodIn this systematic review and meta-analysis, we research MEDLINE for original studies published from January 1st, 2020, to January 31st, 2021, that reported proportions of PACS manifestations. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they included patients aged [≥]18 years with confirmed COVID-19 by RT-PCR or antigen testing and a minimum follow-up of 21 days. The prevalence of individual manifestations across studies was pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. For evaluating determinants of heterogeneity, meta-regression analysis was performed. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42019125025). ResultsAfter screening 1,235 studies, we included 29 reports for analysis. Twenty-seven meta-analyses were performed, and 61 long-term manifestations were described. The pooled prevalence of PACS was 56% (95%CI 45-66%), with the most common manifestations being diminished health status, fatigue, asthenia, dyspnea, myalgias, hyposmia and dysgeusia. Most of the included studies presented high heterogeneity. After conducting the meta-regression analysis, we identified that age, gender, number of comorbidities, and reported symptoms significantly modify the prevalence estimation of PACS long-term manifestations. ConclusionPACS is inconsistently reported between studies, and population characteristics influence the prevalence estimates due to high heterogeneity. A systematized approach for the study of PACS is needed to characterize its impact adequately. Fundingnone
ABSTRACT
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico City has been sharp, as several social inequalities coexist with chronic comorbidities. Here, we conducted an in-depth evaluation of the impact of social, municipal, and individual factors on the COVID-19 pandemic in working-age population living in Mexico City. To this end, we used data from the National Epidemiological Surveillance System; furthermore, we used a multidimensional metric, the social lag index (DISLI), to evaluate its interaction with mean urban population density (MUPD) and its impact on COVID-19 rates. Influence DISLI and MUPD on the effect of vehicular mobility policies on COVID-19 rates were also tested. Finally, we assessed the influence of MUPD and DISLI on discrepancies of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 excess mortality compared with death certificates from the General Civil Registry. We detected vulnerable groups who belonged to economically active sectors and who experienced increased risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes. The impact of social inequalities transcends individuals and has significant effects at a municipality level, with and interaction between DISLI and MUPD. Marginalized municipalities with high population density experienced an accentuated risk for adverse COVID-19 outcomes. Additionally, policies to reduce vehicular mobility had differential impacts across marginalized municipalities. Finally, we report an under-registry of COVID-19 deaths and significant excess mortality associated with non-COVID-19 deaths closely related to MUPD/DISLI in an ambulatory setting, which could be a negative externality of hospital reconversion. In conclusion, social, individual, and municipality-wide factors played a significant role in shaping the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico City.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDSARS-CoV-2 testing capacity is important to monitor epidemic dynamics and as a mitigation strategy. Given difficulties of large-scale quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) implementation, rapid antigen tests (Rapid Ag-T) have been proposed as alternatives in settings like Mexico. Here, we evaluated diagnostic performance of Rapid Ag-T for SARS-CoV-2 infection and its associated clinical implications compared to qRT-PCR testing in Mexico. METHODSWe analyzed data from the COVID-19 registry of the Mexican General Directorate of Epidemiology up to April 30th, 2021 (n=6,632,938) and cases with both qRT-PCR and Rapid Ag-T (n=216,388). We evaluated diagnostic performance using accuracy measures and assessed time-dependent changes in the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC). We also explored test discordances as predictors of hospitalization, intubation, severe COVID-19 and mortality. RESULTSRapid Ag-T is primarily used in Mexico City. Rapid Ag-T have low sensitivity 37.6% (95%CI 36.6-38.7), high specificity 95.5% (95%CI 95.1-95.8) and acceptable positive 86.1% (95%CI 85.0-86.6) and negative predictive values 67.2% (95%CI 66.2-69.2). Rapid Ag-T has optimal diagnostic performance up to days 3 after symptom onset, and its performance is modified by testing location, comorbidity, and age. qRT-PCR (-) / Rapid Ag-T (+) cases had higher risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes (HR 1.54 95% CI 1.41-1.68) and were older, qRT-PCR (+)/ Rapid Ag-T(-) cases had slightly higher risk or adverse outcomes and [≥]7 days from symptom onset (HR 1.53 95% CI 1.48-1.59). Cases detected with rapid Ag-T were younger, without comorbidities, and milder COVID-19 course. CONCLUSIONSRapid Ag-T could be used as an alternative to qRT-PCR for large scale SARS-CoV-2 testing in Mexico. Interpretation of Rapid Ag-T results should be done with caution to minimize the risk associated with false negative results.
