Remote monitoring for implantable defibrillators: a nationwide survey in Italy.

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) permits home interrogation of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and provides an alternative option to frequent in-person visits. OBJECTIVE: The Italia-RM survey aimed to investigate the current practice of ICD follow-up in Italy and to evaluate the adoption and routine use of RM. METHODS: An ad hoc questionnaire on RM adoption and resource use during in-clinic and remote follow-up sessions was completed in 206 Italian implanting centers. RESULTS: The frequency of routine in-clinic ICD visits was 2 per year in 158/206 (76.7%) centers, 3 per year in 37/206 (18.0%) centers, and 4 per year in 10/206 (4.9%) centers. Follow-up examinations were performed by a cardiologist in 203/206 (98.5%) centers, and by more than one health care worker in 184/206 (89.3%) centers. There were 137/206 (66.5%) responding centers that had already adopted an RM system, the proportion of ICD patients remotely monitored being 15% for single- and dual-chamber ICD and 20% for cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD. Remote ICD interrogations were scheduled every 3 months, and were performed by a cardiologist in 124/137 (90.5%) centers. After the adoption of RM, the mean time between in-clinic visits increased from 5 (SD 1) to 8 (SD 3) months (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In current clinical practice, in-clinic ICD follow-up visits consume a large amount of health care resources. The results of this survey show that RM has only partially been adopted in Italy and, although many centers have begun to implement RM in their clinical practice, the majority of their patients continue to be routinely followed-up by means of in-clinic visits.

Defibrillation testing at the time of implantation of cardioverter defibrillator in the clinical practice: a nation-wide survey.

AIMS: Despite an effective defibrillation testing (DT) is considered mandatory to be consistent with the rules of good clinical practice, some physicians are concerned about the risk of complications related to the induction test, and in real world clinical practice, several implant procedures are performed without any induction test. We conducted a systematic nation-wide retrospective survey in order to determine the DT rate and its complications. METHODS AND RESULTS: An ad hoc questionnaire was sent to all 343 Italian implanting centres and the data from the 229 (67%) centres that answered were analysed. During the year 2005, a total of 7857 patients underwent a first implantation of cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), 38% of which with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Of these, 2356 (30%) were implanted without any induction test. In 35 (15%) centres, the induction test was performed in < 25% of the patients, whereas in 136 (59%) centres, it was performed in > 75% of the patients. At multivariable analysis, performed in a subset of 1206 patients from 107 centres, CRT device (OR = 1.82) and primary prevention (OR = 1.47) were independent predictors of the decision to not perform DT. However, altogether, the clinical variables accounted only for 35% of the total variance, whereas the remaining 65% was probably unrelated to clinical factors. There was a total of 22 (0.4%) life-threatening complications as a consequence of the induction test: 4 deaths (0.07%), 8 cardiopulmonary arrests requiring resuscitation manoeuvres (0.15%), 6 cardiogenic shocks (0.11%), 3 strokes (0.05%), and 1 pulmonary embolism (0.02%). CONCLUSION: In real world practice, DT is not performed in a substantial number of patients, most of these in the absence of legitimate reasons. The clinical impact of DT vs. no DT remains unclear until the not negligible complication rate is compared against the long-term potential benefit.

Incidence and clinical relevance of slow ventricular tachycardia in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: an international multicenter prospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the incidence and clinical relevance of slow ventricular tachycardia (VT) and the effectiveness and/or deleterious effects of antitachycardia pacing in slow VT in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter prospective randomized study included 374 patients (326 men) without prior history of slow VT (<148 bpm) implanted with a dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Patients had a 3-zone detection configuration: a slow VT zone (101 to 148 bpm), a conventional VT zone (>148 bpm), and a ventricular fibrillation zone. Patients were randomized to a treatment group (n=183) with therapy activated in the slow VT zone or a monitoring group (n=191) with no therapy in the slow VT zone. During follow-up (11 months), 449 slow VTs occurred in 114 patients (30.5% slow VT incidence); 181 VTs (54 patients) occurred in the monitoring group; 3 were readmitted to the hospital; and lightheadedness and palpitations occurred in 4 and 250 (60 patients) in the treatment group treated by antitachycardia pacing (89.8% success rate) and shock delivery (n=2). There were 10 crossovers from the monitoring to treatment group and 3 crossovers from the treatment to monitoring group (P=0.09). Quality of life scores were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Slow VT incidence (<150 bpm) is high (30%) in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients without prior history of slow VT, has limited clinical relevance, and is efficiently and safely terminated by antitachycardia pacing.

[Clinical case of significant "reverse remodeling" after cardiac resynchronization therapy]. / Caso clinico di significativo "reverse remodeling" dopo terapia di resincronizzazione cardiaca.

A 79-year-old man refers to our echocardiolab for a normal follow-up after 2 years of biventricular pacing. Seven years before the present observation, the patient underwent a biological aortic valve replacement for severe valvular stenosis in the presence of marked systolic dysfunction of the left ventricle and advanced cardiac failure symptoms. The evaluation of the present and past clinical and echocardiographic parameters suggests that conventional surgery and full medical therapy did not elicit an improvement of both functional and clinical parameters, whereas cardiac resynchronization therapy dramatically improved in the mid term all the clinical and functional parameters.