Promising short-term outcomes of free-hand burring technique to implant second-generation metaphyseal cone in Asian knees - a case series.

BACKGROUND: The second-generation metaphyseal cone was useful in managing bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty. However, due to the anatomical constraints in Asian osteometry, the authors utilized a novel free-hand burring technique instead of cannulated reaming for bone preparation. We reported the short-term outcomes of our surgical techniques specific to Asian osteometry. METHODS: We conducted a case series by consecutively recruiting 13 female and 12 male patients (involving 25 knees), with a mean age of 71 years (range, 54-88 years). The patients underwent revision total knee arthroplasty during the period from April 2017 to June 2022. Twenty-three tibial cones and 4 femoral cones using free-hand burring technique were implanted. The mean follow-up duration was 51 months (range 18-80 months). Due to the relatively small bone size and meta-diaphyseal center mismatch in the Asian knees, the free-hand burring technique instead of the cannulated reaming technique was adopted in preparing for cone implantation. The clinical outcomes were knee ranges of motion, the Knee Society Knee scores (KSS), end-of-stem pain, infection, and the need for revision surgery. The radiological outcomes included osteointegration, fracture, and loosening. RESULTS: Mean knee range of motion improved from 83 degrees (range 0°-120°) preoperatively to 106 degrees (range 60°-125°) postoperatively (P < 0.001). Mean KSS improved significantly from 29 (range 0-70) to 69 (range 5-100) (P < 0.001). All cones were osteointegrated. One case had transient end-of-stem pain, two developed intraoperative minor femoral fractures and one suffered from recurrent infection that did not require cone revision. Cone revision-free survivorship was 100%. There was no aseptic loosening. CONCLUSIONS: The second-generation cone implanted with free-hand burring bone preparation yielded promising short-term outcomes in Asian knees.

Preoperative weight loss interventions before total hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The high co-prevalence of obesity and end-stage osteoarthritis requiring arthroplasty, with the former being a risk factor for complications during arthroplasty, has led to increasing interest in employing preoperative weight loss interventions such as bariatric surgery and diet modification. However, the current evidence is conflicting, and this study aimed to investigate the effect of weight loss intervention before arthroplasty in prospective randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Four electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for prospective randomized controlled trials that compared weight loss interventions with usual care from inception to October 2023 by following the PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and GRADE framework were used to assess the quality of the studies. Meta-analyses were performed when sufficient data were available from 2 or more studies. RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials involving 198 patients were identified. Two studies employed diet modification, and one study utilized bariatric surgery. All three studies reported significant reductions in body weight and body mass index (BMI), and intervention groups had fewer postoperative complications. There was no difference in the length of stay between the intervention group and the control group. Variable patient-reported outcome measures were used by different research groups. CONCLUSION: Weight loss intervention can achieve significant reductions in body weight and body mass index before arthroplasty, with fewer postoperative complications reported. Further studies with different populations could confirm the effect of these interventions among populations with different obesity characteristics.

Two-stage Partial Component Retention and Interim Cemented Liner for Infected Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report.

Introduction: There is interest in partial exchange for infected total hip arthroplasty, as an alternative to complete removal of components in a traditional two-stage revision. Partial exchange avoids the difficulty of removing a well-fixed component and its associated bone loss. Case Report: We report a case of a 61-year-old male patient with an infected total hip arthroplasty, who underwent a two-stage partial exchange, with retention of the well-fixed femoral stem, and an interim cemented liner. He had excellent function and no infection recurrence at 4 years of follow-up. Conclusion: Two-stage partial exchange with interim cemented liner could be an effective option for infected total hip arthroplasty.

The role of telemedicine in joint replacement surgery? An updated review.

The usage of telemedicine and telehealth services has grown tremendously and has become increasingly relevant and essential. Technological advancements in current telehealth services have supported its use as a viable alternative tool to conduct visits for consultations, follow-up, and rehabilitation in total joint arthroplasty. Such technology has been widely implemented, particularly during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, to deliver postoperative rehabilitation among patients receiving total joint arthroplasty (TJA), further demonstrating its feasibility with a lower cost yet comparable clinical outcomes when compared with traditional care. There remains ample potential to utilize telemedicine for prehabilitation to optimize the preoperative status and postoperative outcomes of patients with osteoarthritis. In this review, various implementations of telemedicine within total joint arthroplasty and future application of telemedicine to deliver tele-prehabilitation in TJA are discussed.

Application of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning is a promising and powerful technology with increasing use in orthopedics. Periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty results in increased morbidity and mortality. This systematic review investigated the use of machine learning in preventing periprosthetic joint infection. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed was searched in November 2022. All studies that investigated the clinical applications of machine learning in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty were included. Non-English studies, studies with no full text available, studies focusing on non-clinical applications of machine learning, reviews and meta-analyses were excluded. For each included study, its characteristics, machine learning applications, algorithms, statistical performances, strengths and limitations were summarized. Limitations of the current machine learning applications and the studies, including their 'black box' nature, overfitting, the requirement of a large dataset, the lack of external validation, and their retrospective nature were identified. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the final analysis. Machine learning applications in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection were divided into four categories: prediction, diagnosis, antibiotic application and prognosis. CONCLUSION: Machine learning may be a favorable alternative to manual methods in the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty. It aids in preoperative health optimization, preoperative surgical planning, the early diagnosis of infection, the early application of suitable antibiotics, and the prediction of clinical outcomes. Future research is warranted to resolve the current limitations and bring machine learning into clinical settings.

Metal-on-crosslinked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty - an excellent combination at fifteen to twenty years of follow-up.

PURPOSE: Cross-linked polyethylene (PE) has been used with great clinical success in total hip arthroplasty (THA) since its debut in the late 1990's. However, reports regarding this bearing couple near the end of its second decade of service are still scant. The aim of this study was to first determine the long term clinical and radiological results and second Investigate what factors affect wear rates using a metal-on-crosslinked PE bearing articulation. METHODS: 55 THAs using a single brand of cross-linked liner, cementless cup and 28 mm hip ball were performed in 44 patients. Age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and need for revision surgery were recorded. Linear and volumetric wear was determined using the Martell method. RESULTS: Mean age at operation was 51.2 (29-73 ± 12.1) years. Mean duration of follow-up was 16.9 years (range 15.0-20.1 ± 1.1 years). Osteolysis was not present in the latest follow-up radiographs. Median linear and volumetric wear rate was 0.038 mm/year (95% CI 0.032-0.047) and 7.115mm3/year (95% CI 6.92-17.25) respectively. Acetabular component position was not found to be related to both linear and volumetric wear. No significant difference was found in the linear and volumetric wear rates of thinner and thicker liners (8 mm or below and > 8 mm) (p = 0.849 and p = 0.64 respectively). CONCLUSION: Metal-on-crosslinked PE is associated with low linear and volumetric wear rates which has virtually obviated osteolysis and has translated to excellent survivorship even at long term follow up. In-vivo oxidation does not appear to be of clinical concern at this point.

An Asymptomatic Patient with COVID-19 with Hip Hemiarthroplasty Performed: A Case Report of an Orthopaedic Surgeon's Experience.

CASE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a pandemic respiratory disease. Patients typically present with fever, cough, and radiological lung changes. However, a significant proportion of these patients are asymptomatic. To date, we have limited information on the operations performed on these patients. We report our experience of a relatively asymptomatic elderly patient who underwent surgery for a hip fracture and was confirmed postoperatively to have COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Meticulous hand hygiene and use of surgical mask in daily practice is crucial to protect against asymptomatic and undiagnosed patients.

Vascularised bone graft is an effective technique for extracortical bone bridging to combat cemented megaprosthesis loosening at the bone-implant junction.

INTRODUCTION: The bone-implant junction is a potential site for aseptic loosening. Extracortical bone bridging at the bone-implant junction is advocated to improve implant fixation by forming a biological seal. We propose a novel technique with vascularised bone graft (VBG) to form an extracortical bone bridge at the bone-implant junction to enhance implant stability. We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes for tumour megaprostheses performed (1) with and without bone graft and (2) with non-vascularised versus VBG technique. METHODS: Forty-six tumour megaprosthesis procedures from 1 June 2007 to 31 October 2017 were identified from hospital records. Twenty-eight operations incorporated bone graft at the bone-implant junction, and 18 did not. Of these 28 bone graft procedures, 13 involved VBG, and 15 did not (non-VBG). The VBG technique involves resecting a short segment of healthy bone beyond the oncological margin with its preserved blood supply, splitting it, then securing it over the junction. Clinical outcomes assessed included loosening, fracture and recurrence. Extracortical bone growth at the bone-implant junction was quantified radiologically at intervals 0-24 months post-operatively. The mean follow-up was 4.27 years. RESULTS: There were five incidences (27.8%) of loosening in the non-bone graft group compared to zero in the bone graft group (p = 0.03). There was a higher radiological score of extracortical bone growth in the bone graft group compared to no bone graft at 3-24 months post-operatively (p < 0.05). Within the bone graft group, the VBG group fared superior at 6 and 12 months post-operatively compared to non-VBG (p < 0.05), as well as a lower rate of radiological junctional resorption (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend bone grafting for its merits of less implant loosening. We propose the VBG technique to combat early aseptic loosening in megaprosthesis replacement as there was a higher radiological score compared to non-VBG.