ABSTRACT
Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the occurrence and number of T2DM complications with sociodemographic (age, sex, habitation, education), clinical (duration of diabetes, HbA1c (%), BMI) and psychological (well-being, sense of influence on the diabetes course, coping styles) variables. Methods: A total of 2574 adult patients were assessed using The Sense of Influence on the Diabetes Course Scale, WHO-5 Well-Being Index, and the Brief Method of Evaluating Coping with Disease. Hierarchical Regression Analysis was conducted with number of complications as the dependent variable and three sets of variables entered in sequential steps: (a) sociodemographic; (b) clinical and (c) psychological factors. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association of these variables with diabetes complications' occurrence. Results: A higher number of complications and higher odds ratios of occurrence of complications were associated with sociodemographic and clinical variables, poor well-being, low perception of influence on the diabetes course, and an emotion-oriented coping style. The logistic regression indicated that participants with HbA1c >7% (in comparison with HbA1c ≤ 7%) and with high risk of depression (in comparison with no risk of depression) had respectively 68% and 86% higher odds of developing complications. Discussion: The number of complications has weak but statistically significant relations with psychological and clinical factors. Conclusion: The results support the rationale of including the psychosocial factors in the context of diabetes management.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Assessment of the relationship between psychological and sociodemographic factors with the levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and Body Mass Index (BMI) among people with advanced type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2574 persons, among them 1381 (53.7%) women, with type 2 diabetes, during the period of switching from biphasic mixtures of human insulin to insulin analogues. The age of participants ranged from 22 to 94 years (M = 63.5; SD = 9.58), and their treatment period was in the time frame from 2 years to 43 years (M = 10.2; SD = 6.1). Participants filled out a Scale for Perception of Self-Influence on the Diabetes Course, Well-Being Index WHO-5, two questions from the Brief Method of Evaluating Coping with a Disease. RESULTS: Statistically significant correlations were found between the HbA1c levels and (1) disease duration (rs=0.067; p < 0.001); (2) number of complications (rs = 0.191, p < 0.001) (3) the perception of self-influence on the diabetes course (rs=- 0.16; p < 0.001); (4) well-being (risk of depression) (rs=- 0.10; p < 0.001). The regression analysis showed that 7% of HbA1c variability is explained by age, a perception of self-influence on the diabetes course, the number of complications, place of residence, education, BMI. The most important findings concerning BMI were found in regression analysis, which indicated a week relationship between BMI and a number of complications, perception of self-influence on the diabetes course and coping styles (3% of the resultes' variability). The group at high risk of depression had the highest levels of HbA1c. CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic and psychological factors show weak but statistically significant relationships with the current levels of HbA1c and BMI.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Clinical observations suggest that the Brief Measure to Assess Perception of Self-Influence on the Disease Course: A Version for Schizophrenia has the better reliability, than presented in the original publication of the scale [1]. It is used in research and their results indicate moderate relations between the perception of the self-influence on schizophrenia course and social functioning as well as adherence to the recommended treatment. These circumstances justify and new assessment of the reliability of the scale. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Detailed scale for competent judges, who had better opportunity for the comprehensive examination of 59 participants, 27 men and 29 women of age 22-72 lat (M = 40.69; SD = 11.85). RESULTS: The Spearman's correlation between the scores on the version for schizophrenia of the Brief Measure to Assess Perception of Self-Influence on the Disease Course and the assessment of the patients' perception of self-influence on the schizophrenia course by the competent judges rho was 0.56. Whereas, in the first study Pearson's r was 0.45. CONCLUSIONS: Brief Measure to Assess Perception of Self-Influence on the Disease Course - Version for Schizophrenia has good enough validity, as for so brief scale. It can be used in research and clinical practice.
