Potentially inappropriate medicines in elderly hospitalised patients according to the EU(7)-PIM list, STOPP version 2 criteria and comprehensive protocol.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) by using the EU(7)-PIM list, STOPP (Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions) version 2 criteria and the new comprehensive protocol. METHODS: This prospective study involved a sample of 276 consecutive elderly patients discharged from the university teaching hospital. Age, gender, diagnoses, medication history and medicines at discharge were recorded. The main outcome measure was the prevalence of PIMs according to each set of criteria: EU(7)-PIM list, STOPP version 2 criteria and comprehensive protocol. RESULTS: The median patient age (range) was 74 (65-92) years. The median number of prescribed medications was 7 (1-17). STOPP identified 393 PIMs affecting 190 patients (69%), EU(7)-PIM list identified 330 PIMs in 184 patients (66.7%) whilst the comprehensive protocol identified 134 PIMs in 102 patients (37%). STOPP version 2 criteria identified significantly more PIMs per patient than the other two protocols (p < 0.001). Gender (p = 0.002), glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.039) and number of comorbidities (p = 0.001) were associated with the proportion of PIMs for the STOPP version 2 criteria only. CONCLUSION: A very high PIM prevalence at discharge was reported suggesting the urgent need for actions to reduce them. STOPP version 2 criteria identified significantly more PIMs than the EU(7)-PIM list and the comprehensive protocol and was found as a more sensitive tool for PIM detection.

Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke due to occlusion of internal carotid artery - a Serbian Experience with Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke (SETIS).

OBJECTIVE: The benefit of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion is still unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the influence on outcome of intravenous thrombolysis in patients with ICA occlusion comparing to those without it. METHODS: Data were from the national register of all acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis in Serbia. Patients with nonlacunar anterior circulation infarction were included and were divided into two groups, those with and those without ICA occlusion. We compared the differences in demographic characteristics, risk factors, baseline NIHSS score, early neurological improvement, 3-month functional outcome, complications and death between these two groups. RESULTS: Among 521 included patients there were 13.4% with ICA occlusion. Group with ICA occlusion had more males (82.9% vs. 60.5%; p=0.0008), and more severe stroke (baseline NIHSS score 15.3 vs. 13.6; p=0.004). Excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at 3 months was recorded in 32.9% patients with ICA occlusion and in 50.6% patients without (p=0.009), while favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2) was recorded in 50.0% of patients with ICA occlusion vs. 60.1% without (p=0.14). Death occurred in 12.9% patients with ICA occlusion and in 17.3% patients without it (p=0.40). There was no significant difference in rate of symptomatic ICH between the two groups (1.4% vs. 4.2%; p=0.5). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that ICA occlusion was associated with the absence of early neurological improvement (p=0.03; OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.05-3.04). However, the presence of ICA occlusion was not significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome at 3-month (p=0.44; OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.72-2.16) or with death (p=0.18; OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.25-1.29). CONCLUSION: The patients with ICA occlusion treated with intravenous thrombolysis have a worse outcome than patients without it.