Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Respir Med ; 201: 106934, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35872377

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with asthma that is uncontrolled by a medium- or high-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA), a maintenance therapy option is the addition of a long-acting muscarinic agonist, either via multiple inhalers, or single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT). One SITT is the extrafine formulation of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate/glycopyrronium (BDP/FF/G). We used data from two 52-week clinical trials (TRIMARAN and TRIGGER), both conducted in adults with asthma uncontrolled by ICS/LABA, to investigate the cost-effectiveness of BDP/FF/G. METHODS: A Markov cohort state transition model (focusing on exacerbations) was used to investigate the cost-effectiveness of medium- or high-dose BDP/FF/G vs medium- or high-dose BDP/FF, and high-dose BDP/FF/G vs high-dose BDP/FF + tiotropium. The model analysed cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and was developed from the England National Health Service perspective (2020 costs). Uncertainty of the inputs was estimated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Both medium- and high-dose BDP/FF/G were cost-effective vs BDP/FF, with ICERs of £12,224 and £15,587 per QALY gained. High-dose BDP/FF/G was dominant vs BDP/FF + tiotropium, as it was both cheaper and gained QALYs. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base model: medium- and high-dose BDP/FF/G had 94.3% and 88.3% likelihoods to be cost-effective vs BDP/FF; high-dose BDP/FF/G had 100% likelihood to be a dominant strategy vs BDP/FF + tiotropium. CONCLUSIONS: Both medium- and high-dose BDP/FF/G were cost-effective vs medium- and high-dose BDP/FF in adults with asthma that was uncontrolled by ICS/LABA. In addition, high-dose BDP/FF/G was a dominating strategy to high-dose BDP/FF + tiotropium. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT02676076 and NCT02676089.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Beclomethasone , Administration, Inhalation , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Asthma/drug therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Drug Combinations , Formoterol Fumarate , Fumarates/therapeutic use , Glycopyrrolate , Humans , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , State Medicine , Tiotropium Bromide/therapeutic use
2.
Pharmacoecon Open ; 6(4): 519-537, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35474178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ulcerative colitis is highly prevalent in Canada and cost-effective ulcerative colitis therapies are warranted. Vedolizumab subcutaneous (SC) formulation was recently approved for ulcerative colitis maintenance therapy. We assessed vedolizumab SC cost effectiveness vs conventional and advanced therapeutics in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis from a Canadian public healthcare payer perspective. METHODS: A hybrid decision tree/Markov model was developed to evaluate vedolizumab SC costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and cost effectiveness vs conventional therapy, adalimumab SC, infliximab intravenous, golimumab SC, tofacitinib, ustekinumab SC, and vedolizumab intravenous. This model predicts the number of patients achieving clinical response and remission after treatment induction, and sustained benefit during maintenance treatment. To account for statistical uncertainties, the base-case analysis was conducted in a probabilistic manner. Scenario analyses examined the impact of previous treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, dose escalation, loss of efficacy, and treatment adherence. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, conventional therapy was the most cost-effective therapeutic option in the overall population. Vedolizumab SC was cost effective and dominant compared with other advanced therapies (adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib 5 mg, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab intravenous). The annual vedolizumab SC cost per patient was reduced vs ustekinumab SC, tofacitinib 5 mg, vedolizumab intravenous, and golimumab SC by $47,024, $3251, $2120, and $2004 (Canadian dollars), respectively, and exceeded that of infliximab, adalimumab, and conventional therapy by $582, $3293, and $41,024, respectively. Among the treatments, vedolizumab SC generated the highest quality-adjusted life-years overall (14.21), which translated into the best incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained over conventional therapy in the overall population ($109,374) and in anti-tumor necrosis factor-naïve and anti-tumor necrosis factor-experienced patients ($41,658/$114,287). CONCLUSIONS: Conventional therapy offered the most cost-effective therapeutic option followed by vedolizumab SC. Based on a $50,000/quality-adjusted life-year threshold, vedolizumab was cost effective in anti-tumor necrosis factor-naïve patients but not the overall population also when compared to conventional therapy.

3.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol ; 85(Pt B): 203-216, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35227619

ABSTRACT

This study compared the cost per live birth and cost-effectiveness of the originator recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone follitropin alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) and r-hFSH-alfa biosimilars for ovarian stimulation prior to assisted reproductive technology treatment in Spain. A decision tree model was developed, comprising pregnancy and live birth for one treatment cycle with fresh embryo transfer. Clinical inputs were based on a recent meta-analysis by Chua et al. [4]. Cost inputs were extracted from publicly available Spanish sources. The costs per live birth were lower with originator r-hFSH-alfa (€18,138) versus r-hFSH-alfa biosimilars (€20,377). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €7208 for originator r-hFSH-alfa versus biosimilars. Drug acquisition costs for originator r-hFSH-alfa represented 10.5% of total costs in the base case analysis, and 6.2% in a treatment cycle resulting in live birth with one fresh embryo transfer. Results from the sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.


Subject(s)
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Embryo Transfer , Ovulation Induction/methods
4.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol ; 85(Pt B): 188-202, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35304097

ABSTRACT

This was a retrospective real-world evidence analysis of the costs per live birth for reference recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG-HP), based on data from a German in vitro fertilization registry (RecDate). Pregnancy and live birth rates from the RecDate real-world evidence study over three complete assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles using the same gonadotropin drug were used as clinical inputs. Costs related to ART treatment and to drugs were obtained from public sources. Treatment with r-hFSH-alfa resulted in higher adjusted cumulative live birth rates versus hMG-HP after one (25.3% vs. 22.3%), two (30.9% vs. 27.5%), and three (31.9% vs. 28.6%) ART cycles. Costs per live birth were lower with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG-HP after one (€17,938 vs. €20,054), two (€18,251 vs. €20,437), and three (€18,473 vs. €20,680) ART cycles. r-hFSH-alfa was found to be a cost-effective strategy compared with hMG-HP over three cycles.


Subject(s)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human , Menotropins , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Fertilization in Vitro/methods , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/therapeutic use , Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human/therapeutic use , Gonadotropins , Menotropins/therapeutic use , Ovulation Induction/methods , Retrospective Studies
5.
J Med Econ ; 21(4): 365-373, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29271279

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study presents the cost-effectiveness analysis of bariatric surgery in Belgium from a third-party payer perspective for a lifetime and 10-year horizon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision analytic model incorporating Markov process was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding against conventional medical management (CMM). In the model, patients could undergo surgery, or experience post-surgery complications, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, or die. Transition probabilities, costs, and utilities were derived from the literature. The impact of different surgical methods on body mass index (BMI) level in the base-case analysis was informed by the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry and the Swedish Obese Subject (SOS) study. Healthcare resource use and costs were obtained from Belgian sources. A base-case analysis was performed for the population, the characteristics of which were obtained from surgery candidates in Belgium. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis over a 10-year time horizon, the increment in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained from bariatric surgery vs CMM was 1.4 per patient, whereas the incremental cost was €3,788, leading to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €2,809 per QALY. Over a lifetime, bariatric surgery produced savings of €9,332, an additional 1.1 life years and 5.0 QALYs. Bariatric surgery was cost-effective at 10 years post-surgery and dominant over conventional management over a lifetime horizon. LIMITATIONS: The model did not include the whole scope of obesity-related complications, and also did not account for variation in surgery outcomes for different populations of diabetic patients. Also, the data about management of patients after surgery was based on assumptions and the opinion of a clinical expert. CONCLUSIONS: It was demonstrated that a current mix of bariatric surgery methods was cost-effective at 10 years post-surgery and cost-saving over the lifetime of the Belgian patient cohort considered in this analysis.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/economics , Bariatric Surgery/methods , Obesity, Morbid/economics , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Adult , Age Factors , Belgium , Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/economics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Female , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Models, Econometric , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Sex Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
Dan Med J ; 64(8)2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28869031

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Bariatric surgery offers effective obesity treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery in Denmark from a third-party payer perspective in the mid- (ten years) and long-term (lifetime). METHODS: A state-transition Markov model was developed in which patients may experience surgery, post-surgery complications, diabetes mellitus type 2, cardiovascular diseases or die. Transition probabilities, costs and utilities were informed by the literature. Three types of surgery were included: gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. The impact of different surgical methods on BMI level was informed by the Danish Obesity Surgery Registry (Dansk Fedmekirurgiregister). RESULTS: In the ten-year base-case analysis, bariatric surgery led to a cost increment of 19,332 DKK and generated an additional 1.1 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). In the course of a lifetime, surgery leads to savings of 36,403 DKK, an additional 0.7 life years and 2.9 QALYs. Bariatric surgery was cost-effective at ten years with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 17,818 DKK per QALY and was dominant over conservative management in the course of a lifetime. Up to three years of delay in the provision of surgery resulted in a reduction of life years, a lower QALY gain and a minor decrease in healthcare costs. CONCLUSIONS: In Denmark, bariatric surgery is cost-effective at ten years and may produce a significant reduction in healthcare costs over the course of a lifetime in persons with severe obesity. FUNDING: Synergus AB received support for economic model development from Covidien AG (now part of Medtronic). TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery , Health Care Costs , Obesity, Morbid , Bariatric Surgery/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Denmark , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/prevention & control , Gastric Bypass , Humans , Obesity/surgery , Obesity, Morbid/economics , Obesity, Morbid/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Treatment Outcome
7.
Obes Facts ; 10(3): 261-272, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28601866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery in Italy from a third-party payer perspective over a medium-term (10 years) and a long-term (lifetime) horizon. METHODS: A state-transition Markov model was developed, in which patients may experience surgery, post-surgery complications, diabetes mellitus type 2, cardiovascular diseases or die. Transition probabilities, costs, and utilities were obtained from the Italian and international literature. Three types of surgeries were considered: gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding. A base-case analysis was performed for the population, the characteristics of which were obtained from surgery candidates in Italy. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, over 10 years, bariatric surgery led to cost increment of EUR 2,661 and generated additional 1.1 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Over a lifetime, surgery led to savings of EUR 8,649, additional 0.5 life years and 3.2 QALYs. Bariatric surgery was cost-effective at 10 years with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 2,412/QALY and dominant over conservative management over a lifetime. CONCLUSION: In a comprehensive decision analytic model, a current mix of surgical methods for bariatric surgery was cost-effective at 10 years and cost-saving over the lifetime of the Italian patient cohort considered in this analysis.


Subject(s)
Bariatric Surgery/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Adult , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Bariatric Surgery/mortality , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Gastrectomy/economics , Gastric Bypass/economics , Gastroplasty/economics , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Obesity/mortality , Obesity/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...