The trans-subclavian retrograde approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve disease is the most common acquired valvular heart disease in adults. With the increasing elderly population, the proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis who are unsuitable for conventional surgery is increasing. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has rapidly gained credibility as a valuable alternative to surgery to treat these patients; however, they often have severe iliac-femoral arteriopathy, which renders the transfemoral approach unusable. We report our experience with the trans-subclavian approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the CoreValve (Medtronic CV Luxembourg S.a.r.l.) in 6 patients. METHODS: In May 2008 to September 2009, 6 patients (mean age of 82 ± 5 years), with symptomatic aortic stenosis and no reasonable surgical option because of excessive risk, were excluded from percutaneous femoral CoreValve implantation because of iliac-femoral arteriopathy. These patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the axillary artery. Procedures were performed by a combined team of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, and anesthetists in the catheterization laboratory. The CoreValve 18F delivery system was introduced via the left subclavian artery in 6 patients, 1 with a patent left internal thoracic to left anterior descending artery graft. RESULTS: Procedural success was obtained in all patients, and the mean aortic gradient decreased 5 mm Hg or less immediately after valve deployment. One patient required implantation of a permanent pacemaker. One patient required a subclavian covered stent implantation to treat a postimplant artery dissection associated with difficult surgical hemostasis. One patient was discharged in good condition but died of pneumonia 40 days after the procedure. All patients were asymptomatic on discharge, with good mid-term prosthesis performance. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation via a surgical subclavian approach seems safe and feasible, offering a new option to treat select, inoperable, and high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and peripheral vasculopathy.

Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation of a CoreValve in a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis.

In recent years percutaneous aortic valve implantation has emerged as an alternative therapy to treat patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis considered to be high-risk surgical candidates. We report our experience of a percutaneous retrograde CoreValve implantation in a 77-year-old female with aortic bioprosthesis structural degeneration. The patient underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in 1999 with the implantation of a 23 mm Carpentier-Edwards; her last echocardiography showed a severe bioprosthesis stenosis. After evaluation by cardiac surgeons and cardiologist, considering the high risk re-do surgical procedure (Logistic Euroscore 30%) and severe comorbidities (severe pulmonary hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma and severe osteoporosis), a percutaneous aortic valve-in-valve replacement was preferred. A successful percutaneous 26 mm CoreValve prosthesis implantation was performed with the patient awake with local anesthesia and mild sedation. The patient was discharged after 10 days of hospitalization and she is in NYHA functional class I at follow-up. Our experience, characterized by a multidisciplinary approach, necessary to offer the safest conditions and care for patients, demonstrates the feasibility of a new, promising indication for the use of a transcatheter valve implantation: percutaneous treatment of a degenerated aortic bioprosthesis.

Percutaneous implantation of CoreValve aortic prostheses in patients with a mechanical mitral valve.

Concerns exist in the field of transcatheter aortic valve implantation regarding the treatment of patients with mechanical mitral valve for possible interference between the percutaneous aortic valve and the mechanical mitral prosthesis. We report our experience with percutaneous aortic valve implantation in 4 patients with severe aortic stenosis, previously operated on for mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis. All patients underwent uneventful percutaneous retrograde CoreValve implantation (CoreValve Inc, Irvine, CA). No deformation of the nitinol tubing of the prostheses (ie, neither distortion nor malfunction of the mechanical valve in the mitral position) occurred in any of the patients. All patients are alive and asymptomatic at a mean follow-up of 171 days.

Spinal cord stimulation for patients with refractory angina and previous coronary surgery.

BACKGROUND: Refractory angina pectoris is an exceptionally debilitating condition affecting patients who have typically failed multiple percutaneous and surgical revascularizations and optimal medical therapy and who are not amenable for further revascularization procedures. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been adopted in this context at our institution and midterm mortality, anginal status, and quality of life have been evaluated. METHODS: From 1998 to 2004, 51 patients with refractory class III-IV angina, who were not considered candidates for revascularization procedures, underwent SCS. All patients had already undergone previous surgical revascularization and a median of two percutaneous procedures. Transmyocardial laser revascularization had been previously performed in 8 cases (15.6%). Most of the patients (70.5%) had experienced a myocardial infarction. Mean ejection fraction was 0.42 +/- 0.121, Canadian Cardiovascular Society class 3.5 +/- 0.5, quality of life (Spitzer index) 4.5 +/- 1.2, and the median frequency of weekly angina episodes was 10. RESULTS: There were no SCS implantation-related complications. At follow-up (100% complete, mean 24 +/- 18 months), a significant improvement of anginal symptoms (>50% reduction of weekly anginal episodes) occurred in 45 patients (88.2%). In those patients (Responders), the quality of life improved significantly (6.8 +/- 1.5; p < 0.0001), CCS class decreased to 2 +/- 0.7 (p < 0.0001), and the median frequency of weekly angina episodes to 3 (p < 0.0001). At 3 years, Responders' survival was 91.8 +/- 4.6% and the freedom from cardiac events 72.6 +/- 8.42%. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord stimulation is a safe and effective procedure in truly no-option patients affected by refractory angina. A midterm sustained improvement of symptoms and quality of life have been documented with a satisfactory 3-year survival rate.