Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Br Dent J ; 190(3): 112, 2001 Feb 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11236913
3.
Br J Orthod ; 26(3): 191-4, 1999 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10532157

ABSTRACT

This study examined the effects of a number of patient and clinical variables on the breakage of bonded retainers, and consisted of a retrospective review of the survival of 200 bonded retainers. Data was collected from two clinical centres between November 1996 and February 1997. The subjects comprised 198 patients of both sexes divided into three age groups. Retainers at both centres were made in 018-inch co-axial wire with Relyabond and Helioprogress adhesives used at each respective centre. The effects on time to first breakage of adhesive, patient sex, and arch (upper/lower) were considered using Kaplan Meier survival graphs and in Log Rank Tests. Finally, a Cox Proportional Hazard Model was used to examine the joint effects of these factors and the patients' ages. Breakage over a 5-year period with Relyabond was 38.8 per cent upper, 22.1 per cent lower, and with Helioprogress 75 per cent upper and 23.2 per cent lower. Breakage appears to be unrelated to the materials used or to the age and sex of the patients. Upper retainers break more often than lowers (P = 0.016) and early breakage is more likely to occur at an adhesive pad than at a wire (9.6 versus 2.5 per cent within 6 months).


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding/methods , Orthodontic Retainers , Adolescent , Chi-Square Distribution , Child , Confidence Intervals , Dental Bonding/statistics & numerical data , Equipment Failure , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Orthodontic Appliance Design/statistics & numerical data , Orthodontic Retainers/statistics & numerical data , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
4.
Br J Orthod ; 25(3): 222-34, 1998 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9800023

ABSTRACT

The UK Specialist Review Group of the General Dental Council's Education Committee has been charged with taking forward the recommendations in the Chief Dental Officer's report 'UK Specialist Dental Training'. The Specialist Review Group has, in turn, established a number of specialty task groups. This report is from the Task Group for Orthodontics. It was submitted in May 1996.


Subject(s)
Orthodontics/education , Certification , Education, Dental, Continuing , Education, Dental, Graduate , Educational Measurement , Europe , Humans , Professional Practice , Registries , Specialties, Dental/education , Students, Dental/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , United Kingdom , Workforce
6.
Br Dent J ; 176(9): 328, 1994 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8024861
8.
Br Dent J ; 174(3): 93, 1993 Feb 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8427739
9.
Br Dent J ; 172(2): 44, 1992 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1739487
10.
Br J Orthod ; 16(3): 223, 1989 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2765473
11.
Br Dent J ; 162(4): 135-6, 1987 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3468984
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...