Inhaled Medicines: Past, Present, and Future.

The purpose of this review is to summarize essential pharmacological, pharmaceutical, and clinical aspects in the field of orally inhaled therapies that may help scientists seeking to develop new products. After general comments on the rationale for inhaled therapies for respiratory disease, the focus is on products approved approximately over the last half a century. The organization of these sections reflects the key pharmacological categories. Products for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease include ß -2 receptor agonists, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, glucocorticosteroids, and cromones as well as their combinations. The antiviral and antibacterial inhaled products to treat respiratory tract infections are then presented. Two "mucoactive" products-dornase α and mannitol, which are both approved for patients with cystic fibrosis-are reviewed. These are followed by sections on inhaled prostacyclins for pulmonary arterial hypertension and the challenging field of aerosol surfactant inhalation delivery, especially for prematurely born infants on ventilation support. The approved products for systemic delivery via the lungs for diseases of the central nervous system and insulin for diabetes are also discussed. New technologies for drug delivery by inhalation are analyzed, with the emphasis on those that would likely yield significant improvements over the technologies in current use or would expand the range of drugs and diseases treatable by this route of administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review of the key aspects of approved orally inhaled drug products for a variety of respiratory diseases and for systemic administration should be helpful in making judicious decisions about the development of new or improved inhaled drugs. These aspects include the choices of the active ingredients, formulations, delivery systems suitable for the target patient populations, and, to some extent, meaningful safety and efficacy endpoints in clinical trials.

Validation of a general in vitro approach for prediction of total lung deposition in healthy adults for pharmaceutical inhalation products.

BACKGROUND: A validated method to predict lung deposition for inhaled medication from in vitro data is lacking in spite of many attempts to correlate in vitro and in vivo outcomes. By using an in vivo-like in vitro setup and analyzing inhalers from the same batches, both in vitro and in vivo, we wanted to create a situation where information from the in vitro and in vivo outcomes could be analyzed at the same time. METHOD: Nine inhalation products containing either budesonide or AZD4818 were evaluated. These comprised two pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs), a pMDI plus a spacer, four dry powder inhalers, and two dosimetric nebulizers. In vitro, an in vivo-like setup consisting of anatomically correct inlet throats were linked to a flow system that could replay actual inhalation flow profiles through the throat to a filter or to an impactor. In vivo, total lung deposition was measured in healthy adults by pharmacokinetic methods. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We could show that the amount of drug escaping filtration in a realistic throat model under realistic delivery conditions predicts the typical total lung deposition in trained healthy adult subjects in the absence of significant exhaled mass. We could further show that by using combinations of throat models and flow profiles that represent realistic deviations from the typical case, variations in ex-cast deposition reflect between-subject variation in lung deposition. Further, we have demonstrated that ex-cast deposition collected either by a simple filter or by a cascade impactor operated at a fixed flow rate using a mixing inlet, to accommodate a variable flow profile through the inhaler, predicts equally well the lung deposited dose. Additionally, the ex-cast particle size distribution measured by this method may be relevant for predicting exhaled fraction and regional lung deposition by computational models.

Effect of inherent variability of inhalation products on impactor mass balance limits.

When measuring the aerodynamic particle size distribution of pulmonary drug products, the commonly used instrument is a cascade impactor. For this type of analysis, a mass balance (MB) criterion, 85-115% of label claim, has been recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be included in the drug product specification. Using statistical model simulations, the effect of inherent product variability on the risk to fail the proposed criteria has been assessed and compared to the corresponding risk to fail the delivered dose uniformity (DDU) test. The results clearly show that the MB criterion is at odds with typical variability of orally inhaled products and seriously contributes to the risk that a typical batch would be rejected due to natural variability of the delivered dose of the product. The MB criterion is generally more difficult to comply with compared to the corresponding delivered dose uniformity (DDU) test, indicating that the proposed FDA MB specification overrules the DDU criteria as being that controlling the DDU.