Pharmacokinetics and safety of sunitinib malate in subjects with impaired renal function.

This phase I, open-label, single-dose study evaluates the effects of severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of sunitinib and its primary active metabolite, SU12662. Subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance > 80 mL/min), severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min), and ESRD requiring hemodialysis receive a single dose of sunitinib 50 mg. Serial blood samples are collected for quantification of plasma concentrations using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry assay. Safety is monitored. Twenty-four subjects complete the study. Pharmacokinetics in subjects with severe renal impairment appear similar to those with normal renal function. Plasma exposure to sunitinib and SU12662 appears lower in subjects with ESRD compared with subjects with normal renal function or severe renal impairment. Single-dose sunitinib 50 mg is well tolerated regardless of renal function. The currently approved starting dose of sunitinib 50 mg on Schedule 4/2 is expected to be appropriate for patients with renal impairment; any subsequent dose modifications should be based on patients' ability to tolerate treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of laropiprant and glucuronide metabolite in patients with severe renal insufficiency.

Flushing symptoms limit the use of niacin as an effective treatment for dyslipidemia; laropiprant, a prostaglandin D2 receptor subtype 1 antagonist, reduces niacin-induced flushing and is being developed in combination with niacin. The aims of this study were to both determine the effect of renal insufficiency on plasma pharmacokinetics of laropiprant and to assess safety and tolerability in patients with severe renal insufficiency. This open-label study compared the pharmacokinetics of a single laropiprant 40-mg dose in 8 nondialyzed, severe renal insufficiency patients (RIs) with healthy matched subjects (HSs) (24-hour creatinine clearance <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and >80 mL/min/1.73 m(2) for RIs and HSs, respectively). In RIs, laropiprant was well tolerated and the area under the concentration time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) was modestly higher (ratio of geometric least-squares means [GMR] for RIs to HSs was 1.58; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.35); neither the maximum laropiprant plasma concentration (C(max)) nor the time to C(max) (T(max)) was significantly affected. The apparent terminal half-life (t(1/2)) was 26.0 and 14.8 hours for RIs and HSs, respectively (P = 0.007). Similarly, for the inactive laropiprant glucuronide metabolite, the GMR for AUC(0-infinity) was 2.17 (90% CI, 1.44-3.27), and the apparent t(1/2) values were 25.3 to 14.5 hours (P = 0.037) in RIs and HSs, respectively. Renal insufficiency had no clinically significant effect on laropiprant pharmacokinetics. Because niacin and its metabolites are excreted through the kidneys, the combination of niacin with laropiprant should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment.

Lack of a clinically important effect of moderate hepatic insufficiency and severe renal insufficiency on raltegravir pharmacokinetics.

Raltegravir is a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Raltegravir is primarily cleared by hepatic metabolism via glucuronidation (via UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1A1), with a minor component of elimination occurring via the renal pathway. Since the potential exists for raltegravir to be administered to patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency, two studies were conducted to evaluate the influence of moderate hepatic insufficiency (assessed by using the Child-Pugh criteria) and severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance, <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir. Study I evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 400 mg raltegravir in eight patients with moderate hepatic insufficiency and eight healthy, matched control subjects. Study II evaluated the pharmacokinetics of 400 mg raltegravir in 10 patients with severe renal insufficiency and 10 healthy, matched control subjects. All participants received a single 400-mg dose of raltegravir in the fasted state. In study I, the geometric mean ratios (GMR; mean value for the group with moderate hepatic insufficiency/mean value for the healthy controls) and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), the maximum concentration of drug in plasma (C(max)), and the concentration at 12 h (C(12)) were 0.86 (90% CI, 0.41, 1.77), 0.63 (90% CI, 0.23, 1.70), and 1.26 (90% CI, 0.65, 2.43), respectively. In study II, the GMRs (mean value for the group with renal insufficiency/mean value for the healthy controls) and 90% CIs for AUC(0-infinity), C(max), and C(12) were 0.85 (90% CI, 0.49, 1.49), 0.68 (90% CI, 0.35, 1.32), and 1.28 (90% CI, 0.79, 2.06), respectively. Raltegravir was generally well tolerated by patients with moderate hepatic or severe renal insufficiency, and there was no clinically important effect of moderate hepatic or severe renal insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of raltegravir. No adjustment in the dose of raltegravir is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic or renal insufficiency.

A comparison of dosing regimens of paricalcitol capsule for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in CKD stages 3 and 4.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent dosing of calcitriol for secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) has been associated with greater parathyroid hormone (PTH) reduction with fewer calcemic and phosphatemic effects than daily (QD) dosing. METHODS: Secondary analyses of three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter studies in stage 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with SHPT were performed to compare three times per week (TIW) with QD dosing of paricalcitol. The pharmacokinetics of TIW and QD dosing of paricalcitol capsules were assessed in a separate group of healthy subjects. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics revealed similar steady state paricalcitol exposure between dosing regimens. In CKD patients, baseline data were similar between the TIW studies (n = 72, paricalcitol; n = 73, placebo) and QD studies (n = 35, paricalcitol; n = 40, placebo). Both dosing regimens resulted in similar efficacy (91%) for the primary end point of two consecutive > or = 30% decreases in intact PTH from baseline, but the QD regimen resulted in a greater percent reduction in intact PTH from baseline. The chances for developing increased serum calcium and phosphorus levels or Ca x P product were similar between paricalcitol and placebo groups for both treatment regimens. Furthermore, no difference in the risk for these elevations was detected between the TIW and QD regimens. CONCLUSIONS: QD dosing of paricalcitol capsules is as efficacious as TIW dosing in achieving the primary end point (2 consecutive > or = 30% reductions in PTH) in stage 3 and 4 CKD patients with SHPT. Moreover, the QD regimen had no significant effect on hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia or Ca x P product as compared with placebo or intermittent dosing.