Valaciclovir for Epstein-Barr Virus Suppression in Moderate-to-Severe COPD: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) frequently is measured at high levels in COPD using sputum quantitative polymerase chain reaction, whereas airway immunohistochemistry analysis has shown EBV detection to be common in severe disease. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is valaciclovir safe and effective for EBV suppression in COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The Epstein-Barr Virus Suppression in COPD (EViSCO) trial was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted at the Mater Hospital Belfast, Northern Ireland. Eligible patients had stable moderate-to-severe COPD and sputum EBV (measured using quantitative polymerase chain reaction) and were assigned randomly (1:1) to valaciclovir (1 g tid) or matching placebo for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was sputum EBV suppression (defined as ≥ 90% sputum viral load reduction) at week 8. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of serious adverse reactions. Secondary outcome measures were FEV1 and drug tolerability. Exploratory outcomes included changes in quality of life, sputum cell counts, and cytokines. RESULTS: From November 2, 2018, through March 12, 2020, 84 patients were assigned randomly (n = 43 to valaciclovir). Eighty-one patients completed trial follow-up and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome. A greater number of participants in the valaciclovir group achieved EBV suppression (n = 36 [87.8%] vs n = 17 [42.5%]; P < .001). Valaciclovir was associated with a significant reduction in sputum EBV titer compared with placebo (-90,404 copies/mL [interquartile range, -298,000 to -15,200 copies/mL] vs -3,940 copies/mL [interquartile range, -114,400 to 50,150 copies/mL]; P = .002). A statistically nonsignificant 24-mL numerical FEV1 increase was shown in the valaciclovir group (difference, -44 mL [95% CI, -150 to 62 mL]; P = .41). However, a reduction in sputum white cell count was noted in the valaciclovir group compared with the placebo group (difference, 2.89 [95% CI, 1.5 × 106-7.4 × 106]; P = .003). INTERPRETATION: Valaciclovir is safe and effective for EBV suppression in COPD and may attenuate the sputum inflammatory cell infiltrate. The findings from the current study provide support for a larger trial to evaluate long-term clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03699904; URL: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov.

Time of hemodialysis and risk of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic hypertension in maintenance hemodialysis.

Intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic hypertension are complications of hemodialysis (HD) associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and death. Blood pressure (BP) normally fluctuates in a circadian pattern, but whether the risk of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic hypertension varies according to the time of the HD session is unknown. We analyzed two cohorts of thrice-weekly maintenance HD (N = 1838 patients/n = 64,503 sessions from the Hemodialysis [HEMO] Study, and N = 3302 patients/n = 33,590 sessions from Satellite Healthcare). Random effects logistic regression models examined the association of HD start time (at or before 9:00 a.m. [early AM], between 9:01 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. [late AM], and at or after 12:01 p.m. [PM]) with intradialytic hypotension (defined as nadir intra-HD systolic BP (SBP) < 90 mmHg if pre-HD SBP < 160 mmHg, or <100 mmHg if pre-HD SBP ≥ 160 mmHg) and intradialytic hypertension (SBP increase ≥ 10 mmHg from pre-HD to post-HD). Compared to early AM, late AM and PM were associated with an 8% (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.02) and a 16% (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.95) lower risk of intradialytic hypotension in HEMO, respectively. Conversely, compared to early AM, a monotonic higher risk of intradialytic hypertension was observed for late AM (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.12-1.35) and PM (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.27-1.56) in HEMO. These findings were consistent in Satellite. In two large cohorts of maintenance HD, we observed a monotonic lower risk of intradialytic hypotension and a monotonic higher risk of intradialytic hypertension with later dialysis start times. Whether HD treatment allocation to certain times of the day in hypotensive-prone or hypertensive-prone patients improves outcomes deserves further investigation.

Simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to dominant intra-prostatic lesions during extreme hypofractionation for prostate cancer: the impact of rectal spacers.

PURPOSE: Boosting dominant intra-prostatic lesions (DILs) has the potential to increase the therapeutic ratio in prostate cancer radiotherapy. In this study, employing 5-fraction stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver 40 Gy to the prostate clinical target volume (CTV) while boosting the DIL up to 50 Gy was evaluated for patients before and after rectal spacer insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 24 Computed Tomography (CT) scans of 12 prostate cancer patients with unfavourable intermediate or high risk prostate cancer were employed in this study. At least two treatment plans were generated for each patient to compare pre- and post-spacer insertion plans. Plans were evaluated for target coverage, organs-at-risk doses, and the achievable boost dose level. RESULTS: The CTV coverage was significantly better in plans with a spacer, V40Gy 98.4% versus 97.0% (p = 0.012). Using spacers significantly reduced rectal dose in all 12 patients in this study. It was possible to boost DIL to 50 Gy to without violating dose constraints in 6 of 12 patients and to 47.5 Gy in 3 patients post-spacer insertion. For 3 patients (25%) it was not possible to boost DIL above 45 Gy even with a spacer in situ. Without a spacer, for 6 patient (50%) clinically acceptable plan were only achieved when the DIL dose was lowered to 45 Gy. In five of these 6 patients the dose limiting structure was the urethra (urethra planning risk volume V45Gy [cc] ≤ 0.1 cc constraint). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically acceptable plans for 5 fraction SABR, 40 Gy to the prostate CTV, with a SIB to DIL (45-50 Gy) were achieved. The boost dose achieved was DIL location dependent and primarily affected by DIL's proximity to the urethra. Compared to plans before spacer insertion, higher DIL dose were achieved with spacer in situ for 25% of the patients. Moreover, significant reduction in rectal dose and better target coverage were also achieved for all patients with spacers in situ.