The role of mindfulness and resilience in Navy SEAL training.

Mindfulness and resilience are thought to be essential qualities of the military's special operations community. Both are tested daily in Special Operations Forces (SOF) assessment and selection efforts to prepare candidates to persist through grueling training and complex combat situations; but these qualities are rarely measured. While military leadership places value on the concepts of mindfulness and resilience, there is minimal empirical research examining the role that they play in the completion of training. This longitudinal study followed three classes of SEAL candidates at Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S) training over their six-month selection program. We estimated logit models predicting successful completion of BUD/S and specific types of failure in that training environment with indexes of mindfulness and resilience at the start of the program as predictors of completion. The results indicate that (1) mindfulness is unrelated to completion, while (2) resilience is positively related to completion, and (3) The results indicate that mindfulness is generally unrelated to completion, while resilience generally predicts completion.

Examining Multiteam Systems Across Context and Type: A Historiometric Analysis of Failed MTS Performance.

Multiteam systems (MTSs) are complex organizational forms comprising interdependent teams that work towards their own proximal goals within and across teams to also accomplish a shared superordinate goal. MTSs operate within high-stakes, dangerous contexts with high consequences for suboptimal performance. We answer calls for nuanced exploration and cross-context comparison of MTSs "in the wild" by leveraging the MTS action sub-phase behavioral taxonomy to determine where and how MTS failures occur. To our knowledge, this is the first study to also examine how key MTS attributes (boundary status, goal type) influence MTS processes and performance. We conducted historiometric analysis on 40 cases of failed MTS performance across various contexts (e.g., emergency response, commercial transportation, military, and business) to uncover patterns of within- and between-team behaviors of failing MTSs, resulting in four themes. First, component teams of failing MTSs over-engaged in within-team alignment behaviors (vs. between-team behaviors) by enacting acting, monitoring, and recalibrating behaviors more often within than between teams. Second, failing MTSs over-focused on acting behaviors (vs. monitoring or recalibrating) and tended to not fully enact the action sub-phase cycle. Third and fourth, boundary status and goal type exacerbated these behavioral patterns, as external and physical MTSs were less likely to enact sufficient between-team behaviors or fully enact the action sub-phase cycle compared to internal and intellectual MTSs. We propose entrainment as a mechanism for facilitating MTS performance wherein specific, cyclical behavioral patterns enacted by teams align to facilitate goal achievement via three multilevel behavioral cycles (i.e., acting-focused, alignment-focused, and adjustment-focused). We argue that the degree to which these cycles are aligned both between teams and with the overarching MTS goal determines whether and how an MTS fails. Our findings add nuance beyond single-context MTS studies by showing that the identified behavioral patterns hold both across contexts and almost all types of MTS action-phase behaviors. We show that these patterns vary by MTS boundary status and goal type. Our findings inform MTS training best practices, which should be structured to integrate all component teams and tailored to both MTS attributes (i.e., boundary status, goal type) and situation type (e.g., contingency planning).

Psychological and Physiological Predictors of Resilience in Navy SEAL Training.

This research examines resilience from both cognitive and physiological perspectives and the relative importance of resilience for progression within an extremely physical training environment for 116 individuals. Our study provides a unique contribution as an examination of the combined effects of psychological and physiological resilience in the success of individuals in the first phase of a military special operations training course, the Navy's Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S) course. Our study used the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) for the psychological assessment and a blood sample to measure the concentrations of cortisol, DHEA and BDNF, each associated with stress adaptation and neuronal integrity. Our contributions include: heeding the call for more extensive research for resilience, examining physiological markers as predictors in training situations, combining psychological and physiological resilience into a single metric to assess resilience, and providing empirical support for the vital role of resilience in both stamina and persistence in training. Our findings indicate that both psychological and physiological resilience can be important predictors of persistence individually, but combining the measures provides a more holistic view to predict the success of an individual in this intensive training program. The present study has implications not only for the military community, but also for those individuals seeking elite performance in a broad array of fields, like professional athletes, CEO's, and emergency response workers.