Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 53(10): 1893-900, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17019852

ABSTRACT

Biomechanical models of brain deformation are useful tools for estimating parenchymal shift that results during open cranial procedures. Intraoperative data is likely to improve model estimates, but incorporation of such data into the model is not trivial. This study tests the adjoint equations method (AEM) for data assimilation as a viable approach for integrating displacement data into a brain deformation model. AEM was applied to two porcine experiments. AEM-based estimates were compared both to measured displacement data [from computed tomography (CT) scans] and to model solutions obtained without the guidance of sparse data, which we term the best prior estimate (BPE). Additionally, the sensitivity of the AEM solution to inverse parameter selection was investigated. The results suggest that it is most important to estimate the size of the variance in the measurement error correctly, make the correlation length long and estimate displacement (over stress) boundary conditions. Application of AEM shows an average 33% improvement over BPE. This paper represents the first evidence of successful use of the AEM technique in three dimensions with experimental data validation. The guidelines established for selection of model parameters are starting points for further optimization of the method under clinical conditions.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Brain/physiology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Models, Biological , Animals , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Computer Simulation , Elasticity , Physical Stimulation/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Stress, Mechanical , Swine , Viscosity
2.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging ; 24(8): 1039-52, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16092335

ABSTRACT

Brain deformation models have proven to be a powerful tool in compensating for soft tissue deformation during image-guided neurosurgery. The accuracy of these models can be improved by incorporating intraoperative measurements of brain motion. We have designed and implemented a passive intraoperative stereo vision system capable of estimating the three-dimensional shape of the surgical scene in near real-time. This intraoperative shape is compared with the cortical surface in the co-registered preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) volume for the estimation of the cortical motion resulting from the open cranial surgery. The estimated cortical motion is then used to guide a full brain model, which updates a preoperative MR volume. We have found that the stereo vision system is accurate to within approximately 1 mm. Based on data from two representative clinical cases, we show that stereopsis guidance improves the accuracy of brain shift compensation both at and below the cortical surface.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/anatomy & histology , Cerebral Cortex/surgery , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neuronavigation/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Algorithms , Artificial Intelligence , Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Computer Simulation , Depth Perception , Female , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Photogrammetry/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Med Image Anal ; 9(3): 281-93, 2005 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15854847

ABSTRACT

Biomechanical models of brain deformation are increasingly being used to nonrigidly register preoperative MR (pMR) images of the brain to the surgical scene. These model estimates can potentially be improved by incorporating sparse displacement data available in the operating room (OR), but integrating the intraoperative information with model calculations is a nontrivial problem. We present an inverse method to estimate the unknown boundary and volumetric forces necessary to achieve a least-squares fit between the model and the data that is formulated in terms of the adjoint equations, which are solved directly by the method of representers. The scheme is illustrated in a 2D simulation and in a 2D approximation based on a patient case using actual OR data.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/diagnosis , Brain Neoplasms/surgery , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Models, Biological , Subtraction Technique , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Algorithms , Artificial Intelligence , Brain Neoplasms/physiopathology , Computer Simulation , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Intraoperative Care/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods
4.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging ; 22(11): 1358-68, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14606670

ABSTRACT

Brain shift during open cranial surgery presents a challenge for maintaining registration with image-guidance systems. Ultrasound (US) is a convenient intraoperative imaging modality that may be a useful tool in detecting tissue shift and updating preoperative images based on intraoperative measurements of brain deformation. We have quantitatively evaluated the ability of spatially tracked freehand US to detect displacement of implanted markers in a series of three in vivo porcine experiments, where both US and computed tomography (CT) image acquisitions were obtained before and after deforming the brain. Marker displacements ranged from 0.5 to 8.5 mm. Comparisons between CT and US measurements showed a mean target localization error of 1.5 mm, and a mean vector error for displacement of 1.1 mm. Mean error in the magnitude of displacement was 0.6 mm. For one of the animals studied, the US data was used in conjunction with a biomechanical model to nonrigidly re-register a baseline CT to the deformed brain. The mean error between the actual and deformed CT's was found to be on average 1.2 and 1.9 mm at the marker locations depending on the extent of the deformation induced. These findings indicate the potential accuracy in coregistered freehand US displacement tracking in brain tissue and suggest that the resulting information can be used to drive a modeling re-registration strategy to comparable levels of agreement.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Echoencephalography/methods , Image Enhancement/methods , Intraoperative Care/methods , Movement , Neurosurgical Procedures/methods , Subtraction Technique , Animals , Calibration , Echoencephalography/instrumentation , Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Neuronavigation/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Swine
5.
Neurosurg Focus ; 14(2): e6, 2003 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15727427

ABSTRACT

OBJECT: The authors present their experience with coregistration of preoperative imaging data to intraoperative ultrasonography in the resection of high-grade gliomas, focusing on methodology and clinical observation. METHODS: Images were obtained preoperatively and coregistered to intraoperative hand-held ultrasound images by merging the respective imaging coordinate systems. After patient registration and imaging calibration, the authors computed the location on the magnetic resonance (MR) space of each pixel on an ultrasound image acquired in the operating room. The data were retrospectively reviewed in 11 patients with high-grade gliomas who underwent ultrasonography-assisted resection at our institution between June 2000 and December 2002. Satisfactory coregistration of intraoperative ultrasound and preoperative MR images was accomplished in all cases. Ultrasound and MR image data were closely congruent. Preoperative setup and intraoperative use of the system were unencumbering. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these preliminary results, intraoperative ultrasonography is an attractive neuronavigational alternative, by which a less expensive and constraining imaging technique is used to acquire updated information. Optimal intraoperative guidance can be provided by the integration of this with other imaging studies.


Subject(s)
Glioma/diagnostic imaging , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Supratentorial Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Adult , Aged , Calibration , Female , Glioma/surgery , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Intraoperative Care , Male , Middle Aged , Neuronavigation , Preoperative Care , Supratentorial Neoplasms/surgery , Ultrasonography, Interventional/instrumentation
6.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 49(8): 823-35, 2002 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12148821

ABSTRACT

The use of coregistered preoperative anatomical scans to provide navigational information in the operating room has greatly benefited the field of neurosurgery. Nonetheless, it has been widely acknowledged that significant errors between the operating field and the preoperative images are generated as surgery progresses. Quantification of tissue shift can be accomplished with volumetric intraoperative imaging; however, more functional, lower cost alternative solutions to this challenge are desirable. We are developing the strategy of exploiting a computational model driven by sparse data obtained from intraoperative ultrasound and cortical surface tracking to warp preoperative images to reflect the current state of the operating field. This paper presents an initial quantification of the predictive capability of the current model to computationally capture tissue deformation during retraction in the porcine brain. Performance validation is achieved through comparisons of displacement and pressure predictions to experimental measurements obtained from computed tomographic images and pressure sensor recordings. Group results are based upon a generalized set of boundary conditions for four subjects that, on average, account for at least 75% of tissue motion generated during interhemispheric retraction. Individualized boundary conditions can improve the degree of data-model match by 10% or more but warrant further study. Overall, the level of quantitative agreement achieved in these experiments is encouraging for updating preoperative images to reflect tissue deformation resulting from retraction, especially since model improvements are likely as a result of the intraoperative constraints that can be applied through sparse data collection.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Brain/surgery , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Models, Biological , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Animals , Brain/anatomy & histology , Brain/physiology , Computer Simulation , Elasticity , Finite Element Analysis , Intraoperative Period , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Motion , Pressure , Reproducibility of Results , Rheology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Stereotaxic Techniques , Stress, Mechanical , Surgical Equipment , Swine , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
7.
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv ; 1935: 115-124, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26317120

ABSTRACT

In this paper, initial clinical data from an intraoperative MR system are compared to calculations made by a three-dimensional finite element model of brain deformation. The preoperative and intraoperative MR data was collected on a patient undergoing a resection of an astrocytoma, grade 3 with non-enhancing and enhancing regions. The image volumes were co-registered and cortical displacements as well as subsurface structure movements were measured retrospectively. These data were then compared to model predictions undergoing intraoperative conditions of gravity and simulated tumor decompression. Computed results demonstrate that gravity and decompression effects account for approximately 40% and 30%, respectively, totaling a 70% recovery of shifting structures with the model. The results also suggest that a non-uniform decompressive stress distribution may be present during tumor resection. Based on this preliminary experience, model predictions constrained by intraoperative surface data appear to be a promising avenue for correcting brain shift during surgery. However, additional clinical cases where volumetric intraoperative MR data is available are needed to improve the understanding of tissue mechanics during resection.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...