Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Nurs ; 23(1): 256, 2024 Apr 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649865

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abusive supervision by the nurse manager significantly influences nurses' withholding voice about patient safety. The role of impression management motivation and speak up-related climate is crucial in understanding their connection. This study aimed to explore the relationship between abusive supervision, impression management motivation, speak up-related climate, and withholding voice about patient safety. METHODS: This cross-sectional study employed a convenience sampling method to recruit 419 clinical nurses from Taizhou Hospital, Zhejiang Province, China, between 1 November 2022 and 31 January 2023. The study adhered to the STROBE checklist. Abusive supervision and impression management motivation were assessed using the Chinese versions of the Abusive Supervision Scale and the Impression Management Motivation Scale, respectively. Withholding voice about patient safety and speak up-related climate were identified using the Chinese version of the Speaking Up about Patient Safety Questionnaire. RESULTS: Nurse leaders' abusive supervision (ß=0.40, p<0.01) and nurses' impression management motivation (ß=0.10, p<0.01) significantly and positively influenced nurses' withholding voice about patient safety. We introduced impression management motivation as a mediating variable, and the effect of abusive supervision on nurses' withholding voice decreased (ß from 0.40 to 0.38, p< 0.01). Nurses' speak up-related climate played a moderating role between abusive supervision and impression management motivation (ß= 0.24, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Abusive supervision by nursing leaders can result in nurses withholding voice about patient safety out of self-protective impression management motives. This phenomenon inhibits nurses' subjective initiative and undermines their proactive involvement in improving patient safety, and hinders the cultivation of a culture encouraging full participation in patient safety, which should warrant significant attention.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37818578

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The results of the association between aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) expression and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are contradictory. We conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the clinical significance and prognostic value of ALDH1 in NSCLC. METHODS: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang, and CNKI were systematically queried to identify eligible studies. The retrieval time was from database establishment to August 2023. We evaluated the correlation between ALDH1 expression and clinical features of NSCLC by employing odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). In addition, we used hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs to evaluate the role of ALDH1 expression in the prognosis of NSCLC. RESULTS: Our study included 21 literatures involving 2721 patients. The expression of ALDH1 in NSCLC was higher than that in normal tissues (OR = 6.04, 95% CI: 1.25-29.27, P = 0.026). The expression of ALDH1 was related to TNM stage (OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.06-3.09, P = 0.029), tumor grade (OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.17-0.48, P < 0.0001), lymph node metastasis (OR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.52-4.45, P = 0001) and histological subtype (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52-0.86, P = 0.002). In patients with NSCLC, we found that the over-expression of ALDH1 was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.15-1.81, P = 0.002) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.45-2.10, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The expression of ALDH1 is closely associated with the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of NSCLC. ALDH1 may serve as a valuable clinical assessment tool and prognostic predictor in NSCLC.

3.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 946238, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36314008

ABSTRACT

Aim: To study the microecological characteristics of the airway and similarities and differences between healthy people and patients with the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) in Inner Mongolia, and analyze the correlation between the characteristics of the airway microecological structure and clinical indicators of AECOPD patients. Methods: Sputum samples from 36 healthy volunteers and 34 patients with AECOPD were detected by 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing, and the airway microecological characteristics of healthy people and AECOPD patients were revealed by an alpha diversity analysis, beta diversity analysis, and LefSe difference analysis. Results: There were differences in the airway microecological structure between healthy people and AECOPD patients in Inner Mongolia. The airway microbiota composition of AECOPD patients showed an increase in the abundance of common pathogens and a decrease in the abundance of commensal bacteria, and the airway microbial diversity in AECOPD patients was lower than that in healthy people. Long-term use of inhaled glucocorticoid + long-acting ß2 agonist mixture (ICS + LABA), procalcitonin (PCT), blood monocyte count (MONO), hemoglobin (HGB), D-dimer (D-D), and body temperature were negatively correlated with the alpha diversity of the airway micro-ecosystem. Conclusion: The airway microecological composition of the AECOPD population in Inner Mongolia was different from that of the healthy population, and the airway microecological diversity was lower than that of the healthy population. The long-term use of ICS + LABA preparation by patients with AECOPD leads to lower alpha diversity. Alpha diversity was negatively correlated with inflammatory markers (PCT, MONO, D-dimer, body temperature) and HGB in AECOPD patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...