Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 10(5): e0123442, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25954818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-16 (IL-16), a pleiotropic cytokine, plays a fundamental role in inflammatory diseases. This study investigates the association between IL-16 polymorphisms and the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in a Chinese population. METHODS: The IL-16 rs11556218, rs4072111, and rs4778889 polymorphisms were determined in 150 knee OA cases and 147 healthy controls through polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. RESULTS: The results suggested that the variants in IL-16 gene rs11556218 site were associated with a decreased knee OA risk after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, and smoking and drinking status (TG vs. TT: OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89; P = 0.006; GG vs. TT: OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.90; P = 0.042; dominant model: OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.29-0.87; P = 0.002; G vs. T allele: OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.66-0.90; P = 0.003). Similarly, subjects bearing the rs4072111 variant genotypes and alleles also had a lower susceptibility to knee OA compared with those bearing the wild-type (CT vs. CC: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.83; P = 0.002; TT vs. CC: OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.82; P = 0.027; dominant model: OR, 0.65; 95%, CI 0.52-0.80; P <0.001; T vs. C allele: OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81; P <0.001). Further, the C allele and the combined genotype (CC+CT) of rs4778889 were associated with a slightly decreased risk of knee OA. In addition, we found two high-risk haplotypes: TTT (OR, 3.70) and GCC (OR, 6.22). Finally, serum IL-16 levels of knee OA patients were significantly higher than those of controls (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small sample size, this is the first study suggesting IL-16 gene polymorphisms to be associated with the risk of knee OA.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-16/genetics , Osteoarthritis, Knee/genetics , Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length , Aged , Alleles , Asian People/genetics , Case-Control Studies , China/epidemiology , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genotype , Haplotypes , Humans , Interleukin-16/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/blood , Osteoarthritis, Knee/epidemiology , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Risk
2.
Zhongguo Gu Shang ; 26(2): 92-4, 2013 Feb.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23678750

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Kirschner wires and tension-band fixation through posterolateral minimal incision for the treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2010, there were 62 children (38 males and 24 females, ranging in age from 2 to 14 years, averaged 6.8 years) with Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fractures. All the injuries were caused by falling, and all the fractures were fresh injuries. The duration from injury to surgery ranged from 5 to 20 hours. All the children were treated with open reduction through a posterolateral minimal approach, Kirschnere wires and tension-band fixation were fixed with plaster at 90 degrees of elbow flexion, forearm supination, and palms facing upwards. The kirschner pins and wires were removed after fractures healing. The Flynn's criterion was used to evaluate therapeutic effects. RESULTS: The operation time ranged from 30 to 50 min (averaged 45 min). All the patients achieved solid union. Sixty patients were followed up, and the mean follow-up time was 15 months (ranged from 6 to 24 months). At the 6th month after operation, 48 patients got an excellent result, 9 good, 3 bad (light cubitus varus with varus angle about 6 degree, without infection on function) according to Flynn's criteria. There were no complications such as procedure-related pin tract infection, iatrogenic nerve and vascular injuries and myositis ossificans. CONCLUSION: The Kirschner wires and tension-band fixation through posterolateral minimal incision approach can obtain clearer surgical field, simple in operation, and few wound complications. Therefore, this modified treatment is an effective and reliable method for pediatric displaced Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fractures.


Subject(s)
Bone Wires , Casts, Surgical , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Supine Position
3.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 132(7): 1021-9, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22446696

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty are used to treat displaced femoral neck fractures. However, the optimal treatment of these fractures remained controversial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects that compare total hip arthroplasty with hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (January 1980 to 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to 2010), and the Cochrane Library 2010; issue 1. Only prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare total hip arthroplasty with hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly were included. The analysis was performed with software RevMan5.0 from the Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: We identified seven relevant randomized controlled trials with a total of 828 participants. The meta-analysis showed relative risk of re-operation was 0.40 (95% CI = 0.24-0.67, P = 0.0004), the dislocation was 2.02 (95% CI = 1.26-3.25, P = 0.002), the mobility as functional outcome was 1.70 (95% CI = 1.21-2.38, P = 0.002). It was reported that the average operating room times and blood loss volumes in total hip arthroplasty were more than in hemiarthroplasty (P < 0.001). Other results were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Total hip arthroplasty is associated with better functional outcome and lower reoperation rate than hemiarthroplasty in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly patients.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Femoral Neck Fractures/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Recovery of Function , Reoperation , Treatment Outcome
4.
Knee ; 19(4): 246-52, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22300844

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The arguments about whether posterior-substituting prostheses or cruciate-retaining prostheses are superior to the other after total knee arthroplasty never stop. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical effects of these two different designs. METHODS: The study was performed according to the guidelines described in the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Methodological features were collected and extracted by two reviewers independently. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials with 1261 knees were eligible for pooled analysis. The meta-analysis demonstrated there were no statistical differences in the Knee Society Score, Hospital for Special Surgery, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index, tibial component alignment, femoral component alignment, tibial posterior slope, joint line, and incidence of complications with short-to medium-term follow-up (p>0.01). Statistically difference in postoperative range of motion (WMD: 4.34°, 95% CI: 3.18° to 5.50°) in favor of PS prostheses was found between groups (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The findings indicate there were no significant statistical differences in knee scores, radiological outcomes, and complications between the two types of implants. Statistically significant difference in postoperative ROM was found between the two groups, but no clinical difference.


Subject(s)
Knee Prosthesis , Prosthesis Design , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Humans , Knee Joint/physiology , Posterior Cruciate Ligament , Range of Motion, Articular
5.
J Arthroplasty ; 26(6): 847-54, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21074357

ABSTRACT

Whether high-flexion prostheses are superior to conventional prostheses after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of these 2 different designs. After a comprehensive search, 11 trials with 1204 knees were eligible for data extraction and pooled analysis. The results demonstrated that there were no differences in range of motion of high-flexion posterior-stabilized vs standard posterior-stabilized TKA (weighted mean improvement, 0.93°; 95% confidence intervals, -0.75° to 2.60°; P = .28), range of motion of high-flexion cruciate-retaining vs cruciate-retaining TKA (2.06°; 0.06°-4.17°; P = .06), weight-bearing flexion (2.05°; 0.99°-5.08°; P = .19), Knee Society Scores (1.59 points; 0.42-3.60 points; P = .12), and Hospital for Special Surgery Scores (0.84 points; 0.37-2.04 points; P = .17) with at least 1-year follow-up. No infection, loosening, and osteolysis were found. The current evidences cannot confirm that high-flexion prostheses are superior to conventional prostheses.


Subject(s)
Knee Joint , Knee Prosthesis , Prosthesis Design , Range of Motion, Articular , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/surgery , Knee Prosthesis/adverse effects , Male , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Prosthesis Design/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...