Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Pharm ; 641: 123084, 2023 Jun 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37245738

ABSTRACT

The freezing step of the lyophilization process can impact nanoparticle stability due to increased particle concentration in the freeze-concentrate. Controlled ice nucleation is a technique to achieve uniform ice crystal formation between vials in the same batch and has attracted increasing attention in pharmaceutical industry. We investigated the impact of controlled ice nucleation on three types of nanoparticles: solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), polymeric nanoparticles (PNs), and liposomes. Freezing conditions with different ice nucleation temperatures or freezing rates were employed for freeze-drying all formulations. Both in-process stability and storage stability up to 6 months of all formulations were assessed. Compared with spontaneous ice nucleation, controlled ice nucleation did not cause significant differences in residual moisture and particle size of freeze-dried nanoparticles. The residence time in the freeze-concentrate was a more critical factor influencing the stability of nanoparticles than the ice nucleation temperature. Liposomes freeze-dried with sucrose showed particle size increase during storage regardless of freezing conditions. By replacing sucrose with trehalose, or adding trehalose as a second lyoprotectant, both the physical and chemical stability of freeze-dried liposomes improved. Trehalose was a preferable lyoprotectant than sucrose to better maintain the long-term stability of freeze-dried nanoparticles at room temperature or 40 °C.


Subject(s)
Ice , Nanoparticles , Liposomes , Trehalose , Freeze Drying/methods , Sucrose/chemistry
2.
Methods Mol Biol ; 2622: 139-146, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36781757

ABSTRACT

Solid lipid nanoparticles are promising carriers that allow for the delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs and have the potential to achieve sustained drug release or targeted delivery to the site of interest. Here we describe the preparation of solid lipid nanoparticles by forming a microemulsion at an elevated temperature which, upon cooling, yields a suspension of solid nanoparticles. This nanotemplate engineering method is inexpensive, reproducible, and easy to scale up.


Subject(s)
Lipids , Nanoparticles , Drug Delivery Systems , Liposomes , Drug Carriers , Particle Size
3.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 169: 256-267, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34732383

ABSTRACT

Freeze-drying is an effective approach to improve the long-term stability of nanomedicines. Lyoprotectants are generally considered as requisite excipients to ensure that the quality of nanoparticles is maintained throughout the freeze-drying process. However, depending on the type of nanoparticles, the needs for lyoprotectants or the challenges they face during freeze-drying may be different. In this study, we compared and identified the impact of freeze-drying on key characteristics of three types of nanoparticles: solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), polymeric nanoparticles (PNs), and liposomes. Sucrose, trehalose, and mannitol were added to nanoparticle suspensions before freeze-drying. The same conservative freeze-drying conditions with controlled ice nucleation at -8 °C were employed for all formulations. The collapse temperatures of nanoparticle formulations were found to be the same as those of the lyoprotectant added, except PN formulation. Likely the poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) in the formulation induced a higher collapse temperature and retardation of drying of PNs. Freeze-drying of both SLNs and liposomes without lyoprotectants increased particle size and polydispersity, which was resolved by adding amorphous disaccharides. Regardless of the addition of lyoprotectants, freeze-drying did not alter the size of PNs possibly due to the protection from PVA. However, lyoprotectants were still necessary to shorten the reconstitution time and reduce the residual moisture. In conclusion, different types of nanoparticles face distinct challenges for freeze-drying, and lyoprotectants differentially affect various stability and quality attributes of freeze-dried nanoparticles.


Subject(s)
Freeze Drying , Liposomes/pharmacology , Mannitol/pharmacology , Sucrose/pharmacology , Trehalose/pharmacology , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical/methods , Drug Compounding/methods , Excipients/pharmacology , Freeze Drying/methods , Freeze Drying/standards , Humans , Nanoparticles , Nanotechnology , Particle Size , Quality Improvement , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/trends
4.
AAPS PharmSciTech ; 22(1): 42, 2021 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33426616

ABSTRACT

In vitro release studies are commonly used to assess the product performance of topical dosage forms. In such studies, the mass transport of drugs through synthetic membranes into a receiving chamber filled with a release medium is measured. The release medium is also passed through filtration membranes prior to chromatographic analysis. There are no official guidelines directing membrane selection for in vitro release studies or for filtration. Considering the diversity in membrane materials and their physical properties, the aim of this study was to investigate membrane-drug binding and the effect of various membranes on the release performance of a model drug dexamethasone (DEX) using USP dissolution apparatus IV. Seven membranes of different pore sizes (0.45 and 1.2 µm) and materials (cellulose acetate, polyethersulfone, and nylon) were assessed. Two different methods, syringe filter and 24-h incubation, were used for the determination of membrane-drug binding effects at low drug concentrations and saturated concentration conditions. Cellulose acetate and nylon membranes showed significant drug binding after 24-h incubations at both drug concentrations. DEX diffusion through membranes was significantly slowed down in all the tested membranes when compared with DEX solution without membranes. The extent of the retardation varied due to the differences in membrane structures. In conclusion, materials and sources of membranes affected drug dissolution profiles and the results showed membrane-drug binding effects. Proper selection of membranes with low drug binding ability and low diffusion resistance is essential to ensure appropriate and reproducible in vitro release assessments and filtration studies. Graphical Abstract.


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone/chemistry , Drug Liberation , Diffusion , Filtration , Membranes, Artificial
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...