Assessment of drug-drug interactions between daclatasvir and methadone or buprenorphine-naloxone.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among people who inject drugs, including those managed with maintenance opioids. Pharmacokinetic interactions between opioids and emerging oral HCV antivirals merit evaluation. Daclatasvir is a potent pangenotypic inhibitor of the HCV NS5A replication complex recently approved for HCV treatment in Europe and Japan in combination with other antivirals. The effect of steady-state daclatasvir (60 mg daily) on stable plasma exposure to oral opioids was assessed in non-HCV-infected subjects receiving methadone (40 to 120 mg; n = 14) or buprenorphine plus naloxone (8 to 24 mg plus 2 to 6 mg; n = 11). No relevant interaction was inferred if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) of opioid area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCτ) or maximum concentration in plasma (C max) with versus without daclatasvir was within literature-derived ranges of 0.7 to 1.43 (R- and S-methadone) or 0.5 to 2.0 (buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine). Dose-normalized AUCτ for R-methadone (GMR, 1.08; 90% CI, 0.94 to 1.24), S-methadone (1.13; 0.99 to 1.30), and buprenorphine (GMR, 1.37; 90% CI, 1.24 to 1.52) were within the no-effect range. The norbuprenorphine AUCτ was slightly elevated in the primary analysis (GMR, 1.62; 90% CI, 1.30 to 2.02) but within the no-effect range in a supplementary analysis of all evaluable subjects. Dose-normalized C max for both methadone enantiomers, buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine, were within the no-effect range. Standardized assessments of opioid pharmacodynamics were unchanged throughout daclatasvir administration with methadone or buprenorphine. Daclatasvir pharmacokinetics were similar to historical data. Coadministration of daclatasvir and opioids was generally well tolerated. In conclusion, these data suggest that daclatasvir can be administered with buprenorphine or methadone without dose adjustments.

A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of two different formulations of extended-release niacin.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare pharmacokinetic parameters of niacin extended-release tablets (NER uncoated) and niacin extended-release caplet formation (NER coated). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five healthy male and female subjects were enrolled in a four-period, open-label, randomized, crossover study. Both NER uncoated and NER coated were given as 1 x 1000 mg or 2 x 500 mg tablets. Similarity of NER coated 1 x 1000 mg and NER uncoated 2 x 500 mg was declared if 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for nicotinuric acid (NUA) Cmax fell within the pre-specified bounds of [0.7, 1.43]. RESULTS: The GMRs for NUA Cmax demonstrated similarity in the pharmacokinetics of NER uncoated 2 x 500 mg, NER coated 1 x 1000 mg, and NER coated 2 x 500 mg. Although less stringent comparability bounds were prespecified for the primary pharmacokinetic endpoint (i.e., Cmax of plasma NUA), inspection of the primary comparison of interest indicated that a hypothesis with more stringent bioequivalence bounds of [0.8, 1.25] would have been satisfied. The NUA Cmax for NER uncoated 1 x 1000 mg was approximately 40% higher than that seen for the other three treatments. In contrast, total urinary excretion of niacin and its metabolites, an approximate measure of bioavailability, was similar for all four treatments. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic profile of the original NER uncoated formulation dosed as 2 x 500 mg was similar to the new film-coated formulation, NER coated, dosed as 1 x 1000 mg.