ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Bioassays provide information on the functionality of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TSH-R-Ab) and thus may offer more clinical utility than binding assays. OBJECTIVE: In this prospective, blinded, US-based study, the clinical performance of several TSH-R-Ab assays was compared. SETTING: US endocrinology clinic. SUBJECTS: One hundred sixty-two unselected, consecutive, well-documented patients with various thyroid diseases and healthy controls. INTERVENTION(S): Blinded TSH-R-Ab measurements. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sensitivity and specificity of 4 TSH-R-Ab assays. RESULTS: The 4 TSH-R-Ab assays were negative in all 42 patients without autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). In 104 patients with Graves' disease (GD), irrespective of the disease duration, TSH-R-Ab positivity was present in 65 (63%), 67 (65%), and 87 (84%) for the Cobas and Immulite binding assays and stimulatory TSH-R-Ab [thyroid-stimulating immunoglobin (TSI)] bioassay, respectively (TSI vs Immulite P < .0025, TSI vs Cobas P < .0009). Fifteen newly diagnosed GD patients were all positive in the TSI bioassay, but only 11 (73%) were positive in the Cobas and Immulite binding assays. Nine GD patients with biochemical subclinical hyperthyroidism were TSI-positive but Immulite- and Cobas-negative. Two GD patients were blocking TSH-R-Ab [thyroid-blocking immunoglobin (TBI)]-positive and TSI-negative, and the Immulite and Cobas were positive in both. Additional serum samples from AITD patients that consisted of 30 TBI-positive and 10 TSI-positive samples were blindly tested in the binding assays. Only 6 of the 10 TSI-positive samples were positive in both binding assays, and 30 and 28 of the TBI-positive samples were positive in the Cobas and Immulite assays, respectively. CONCLUSION: Binding TSH-R-Ab assays are less sensitive than TSI bioassays and are not specific for stimulating antibodies. Measuring the function of TSH-R-Ab in a bioassay can provide useful information to clinicians.
ABSTRACT
Context: Serum thyroglobulin (Tg) is a biochemical marker for detecting persistent or recurrent differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) post-thyroidectomy. Tg can indicate DTC before structural disease (SD) is visible with imaging procedures. Objective: This work aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of the Elecsys® Tg II assay at a Tg cutoff of 0.2â ng/mL for ruling out SD in adults with DTC after total/near-total thyroidectomy, with or without radioiodine ablation (RAI). Methods: Patients were enrolled into 2 cohorts: longitudinal (Tg assessed every 6 months over 2 years under thyroid-stimulating hormone [TSH] suppression therapy following thyroidectomy with or without RAI) and cross-sectional with confirmed SD (Tg assessed once >12 weeks after thyroidectomy). Analyses were performed for both cohorts combined and in the longitudinal cohort. Results: The study included 530 clinically evaluable samples, the majority (n = 424 samples) from patients who had not received RAI treatment. Following correction for SD prevalence (4.97% in the longitudinal cohort), an Elecsys Tg II cutoff of 0.2â ng/mL ruled out SD with a negative predictive value of 99.9% (95% CI, 99.5%-100%). The assay had excellent sensitivity (98.5%-100%) and acceptable specificity (53.4%-53.5%) for detecting SD (Tg ≥ 0.2â ng/mL) for both cohorts combined and in the longitudinal cohort, with similar findings in RAI-treated and non-RAI-treated subgroups. Conclusion: In this cohort of DTC patients post-thyroidectomy, a Tg cutoff of 0.2â ng/mL was highly effective for ruling out the presence of SD under TSH-suppressed conditions, including in patients who had not received RAI treatment.
ABSTRACT
Background: The addition of genetic analysis to the evaluation of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples improves diagnostic accuracy of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) with Bethesda III or IV cytopathology. We previously reported the performance of a multiplatform molecular test, referred to in this study as MPTXv1, that includes a mutation panel (ThyGeNEXT®) plus an algorithmic microRNA (miRNA) risk classifier (ThyraMIR®). Complex interactions of growth-promoting and -suppressing miRNAs affect the phenotype. We previously demonstrated that accounting for these interactions with pairwise miRNA expression analysis improves the diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma. In this study, we assess the impact of pairwise miRNA expression analysis on risk stratification of ITNs. Methods: Pairwise expression analysis of 11 miRNAs was performed on a training cohort of histopathology-proven benign nodules (n = 50) to define the mean and standard deviation of each pairwise analysis and create a Benign/Malignant Profiler (MPTXv2), deviations from which predicted the malignancy risk. Clinical validation of MPTXv2 was assessed using a cohort of 178 ITN (Bethesda III and IV) samples from a multicentered, blinded retrospective study, previously evaluated by MPTXv1. Results: Compared with MPTXv1, MPTXv2 significantly improved the test performance. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) areas under the curve (AUC) increased from 0.85 to 0.97 (p < 0.001), and the diagnostic accuracy at the positive threshold increased significantly (p < 0.05) from 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 76-88] to 93% [CI = 89-96]. The significant improvement in the ROC AUC and the diagnostic accuracy was due to a strong statistical trend for improvement in specificity at the positive threshold. At the positive threshold, the specificity for MPTXv1 was 90% [CI = 84-95] and improved to 98% [CI = 94-99] for MPTXv2. Using the MPTXv2, the Moderate-Risk cohort decreased from 50 samples (28% of the cohort) to 24 samples (13% of the cohort). This 52% decrease is statistically significant (p < 0.001) and clinically meaningful. Conclusion: As compared with MPTXv1, pairwise miRNA expression analysis used in MPTXv2 significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of ITN risk stratification and reduced the size of the Moderate-Risk group. Prospective trials are indicated to confirm these findings in a clinical practice setting.
Subject(s)
MicroRNAs , Thyroid Neoplasms , Thyroid Nodule , Humans , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/genetics , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Prospective Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Thyroid Neoplasms/genetics , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/analysis , MutationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of ultrasound-guided ablation procedures to treat both benign and malignant thyroid conditions is gaining increasing interest. This document has been developed as an international interdisciplinary evidence-based statement with a primary focus on radiofrequency ablation and is intended to serve as a manual for best practice application of ablation technologies. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to guide statement development and generation of best practice recommendations. Modified Delphi method was applied to assess whether statements met consensus among the entire author panel. RESULTS: A review of the current state of ultrasound-guided ablation procedures for the treatment of benign and malignant thyroid conditions is presented. Eighteen best practice recommendations in topic areas of preprocedural evaluation, technique, postprocedural management, efficacy, potential complications, and implementation are provided. CONCLUSIONS: As ultrasound-guided ablation procedures are increasingly utilized in benign and malignant thyroid disease, evidence-based and thoughtful application of best practices is warranted.
Subject(s)
Radiofrequency Ablation , Radiology , Surgeons , Thyroid Nodule , Humans , Latin America , Republic of Korea , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Ultrasonography, Interventional , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The first edition of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules was published in 2006 and updated in 2010 and 2016. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi multidisciplinary thyroid nodules task force was charged with developing a novel interactive electronic algorithmic tool to evaluate thyroid nodules. METHODS: The Thyroid Nodule App (termed TNAPP) was based on the updated 2016 clinical practice guideline recommendations while incorporating recent scientific evidence and avoiding unnecessary diagnostic procedures and surgical overtreatment. This manuscript describes the algorithmic tool development, its data requirements, and its basis for decision making. It provides links to the web-based algorithmic tool and a tutorial. RESULTS: TNAPP and TI-RADS were cross-checked on 95 thyroid nodules with histology-proven diagnoses. CONCLUSION: TNAPP is a novel interactive web-based tool that uses clinical, imaging, cytologic, and molecular marker data to guide clinical decision making to evaluate and manage thyroid nodules. It may be used as a heuristic tool for evaluating and managing patients with thyroid nodules. It can be adapted to create registries for solo practices, large multispecialty delivery systems, regional and national databases, and research consortiums. Prospective studies are underway to validate TNAPP to determine how it compares with other ultrasound-based classification systems and whether it can improve the care of patients with clinically significant thyroid nodules while reducing the substantial burden incurred by those who do not benefit from further evaluation and treatment.
Subject(s)
Endocrinology , Thyroid Neoplasms , Thyroid Nodule , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The first edition of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules was published in 2006 and updated in 2010 and 2016. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi multidisciplinary thyroid nodules task force was charged with developing a novel interactive electronic algorithmic tool to evaluate thyroid nodules. METHODS: The Thyroid Nodule App (termed TNAPP) was based on the updated 2016 clinical practice guideline recommendations while incorporating recent scientific evidence and avoiding unnecessary diagnostic procedures and surgical overtreatment. This manuscript describes the algorithmic tool development, its data requirements, and its basis for decision making. It provides links to the web-based algorithmic tool and a tutorial. RESULTS: TNAPP and TI-RADS were cross-checked on 95 thyroid nodules with histology-proven diagnoses. CONCLUSION: TNAPP is a novel interactive web-based tool that uses clinical, imaging, cytologic, and molecular marker data to guide clinical decision making to evaluate and manage thyroid nodules. It may be used as a heuristic tool for evaluating and managing patients with thyroid nodules. It can be adapted to create registries for solo practices, large multispecialty delivery systems, regional and national databases, and research consortiums. Prospective studies are underway to validate TNAPP to determine how it compares with other ultrasound-based classification systems and whether it can improve the care of patients with clinically significant thyroid nodules while reducing the substantial burden incurred by those who do not benefit from further evaluation and treatment.
Subject(s)
Endocrinology , Thyroid Neoplasms , Thyroid Nodule , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Approximately 25% of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) have cytology that is indeterminate for malignant disease. Accurate risk stratification of these FNAs with ancillary testing would reduce unnecessary thyroid surgery. METHODS: We evaluated the performance of an ancillary multiplatform test (MPTX) that has three diagnostic categories (negative, moderate, and positive). MPTX includes the combination of a mutation panel (ThyGeNEXT®) and a microRNA risk classifier (ThyraMIR®). A blinded, multicenter study was performed using consensus histopathology diagnosis among three pathologists to validate test performance. RESULTS: Unanimous consensus diagnosis was reached in 197 subjects with indeterminate thyroid nodules; 36% had disease. MPTX had 95% sensitivity (95% CI,86%-99%) and 90% specificity (95% CI,84%-95%) for disease in prevalence adjusted nodules with Bethesda III and IV cytology. Negative MPTX results ruledout disease with 97% negative predictive value (NPV; 95% CI,91%-99%) at a 30% disease prevalence, while positive MPTX results ruledin high risk disease with 75% positive predictive value (PPV; 95% CI,60%-86%). Such results are expected in four out of five Bethesda III and IV nodules tested, including RAS positive nodules in which the microRNA classifier was useful in rulingin disease. 90% of mutation panel false positives were due to analytically verified RAS mutations detected in benign adenomas. Moderate MPTX results had a moderate rate of disease (39%, 95% CI,23%-54%), primarily due to RAS mutations, wherein the possibility of disease could not be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize that decisions for surgery should not solely be based on RAS or RAS-like mutations. MPTX informs management decisions while accounting for these challenges.
Subject(s)
Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/methods , Female , Humans , Male , MicroRNAs/genetics , Middle Aged , Mutation/genetics , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thyroid Gland/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Thyroid Neoplasms/genetics , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Nodule/genetics , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This article provides suggestions to help clinicians implement important changes in the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma ("ATA 2015") across diverse settings. METHODS: Key ATA 2015 changes are summarized regarding: ( 1) thyroid nodule management; ( 2) lobectomy versus thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC); and ( 3) surveillance following primary treatment of DTC. Advice to facilitate implementation is based on clinical experience and selected literature. RESULTS: Strategies are described to enhance acquisition of high-quality information that helps identify patients who may possibly avoid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules or total thyroidectomy for DTC, or undergo less intense postoperative surveillance. Sonographic imaging of nodules may improve if sonograms are obtained by clinicians ordering or performing FNA or trusted high-volume sonographers. Cytopathologic assessment and reporting can be improved by working with regional or national experts. Pre-operative evaluation by endocrinologists is important so that patients are referred to experienced, proficient surgeons and assisted with well-informed decision-making regarding surgical radicality. Endocrinologists and surgeons should ensure performance of pre-operative neck ultrasonography, voice/laryngeal evaluation, and contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging when appropriate. Findings should be disseminated to all healthcare team members, ideally through a comprehensive medical record accessible to the entire team. CONCLUSION: Optimization of the sequence of specialist visits and assembly of interactive multidisciplinary teams coupled with intensified interdisciplinary and patient communication may enable clinicians to more effectively implement ATA 2015, which calls for more individualized, and often, less "invasive" management of thyroid nodules and DTC. ABBREVIATIONS: ATA 2009 = 2009 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma; ATA 2015 = 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma; DTC = differentiated thyroid carcinoma; FNA = fine-needle aspiration; PET/CT = positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Subject(s)
Thyroid Neoplasms/therapy , Thyroid Nodule/therapy , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Humans , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Thyroidectomy , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: RAS mutations are common in the available mutational analysis of cytologically indeterminate (Cyto-I) thyroid nodules. However, their reported positive predictive value (PPV) for cancer is widely variable. The reason for this variability is unknown, and it causes clinical management uncertainty. A systematic review was performed, evaluating the PPV for cancer in RAS mutation positive Cyto-I nodules, and variables that might affect residual heterogeneity across the different studies were considered. METHODS: PubMed was searched through February 22, 2017, including studies that evaluated at least one type of RAS mutation in Cyto-I nodules, including any (or all) of the Bethesda III/IV/V categories or their equivalents and where the histological diagnosis was available. The PPV residual heterogeneity was investigated after accounting for Bethesda classification, blindedness of the histopathologist to the RAS mutational status, Bethesda category-specific cancer prevalence for each study, and which RAS genes and codons were tested. This was studied using five meta-regression models fit to different sets of Bethesda classification categories: Bethesda III, IV, or V (III/IV/V); Bethesda III or IV (III/IV); Bethesda III only; Bethesda IV only; and Bethesda V only. RESULTS: Of 1831 studies, 23 were eligible for data inclusion. Wide ranges of PPV were found at 0-100%, 28-100%, and 0-100% in Bethesda III, IV, and V, respectively. Residual heterogeneity remained moderately high for PPV after accounting for the above moderators for Bethesda III/IV/V (21 studies; I2 = 59.5%) and Bethesda III/IV (19 studies; I2 = 66.0%), with significant Cochran's Q-test for residual heterogeneity (p < 0.001). Among individual Bethesda categories, residual heterogeneity was: Bethesda III (eight studies; I2 = 89.0%), IV (12 studies; I2 = 53.5%), and V (10 studies; I2 = 34.4%), with significant Cochran's Q-test for Bethesda III (p < 0.001) and IV (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The PPV of RAS mutations in Bethesda III and IV categories is quite heterogeneous across different studies, creating low confidence in the accuracy of a single estimate of PPV. Clinicians must appreciate this wide variability when managing a RAS-mutated Cyto-I nodule. Future studies should seek to resolve this unexplained variability.
Subject(s)
Mutation , Thyroid Nodule/genetics , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , ras Proteins/genetics , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , DNA Mutational Analysis , Humans , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosisABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a subset of cell-free DNA (cfDNA), is a potential biomarker for thyroid cancer. We determined the performance of a ctDNA panel for detecting thyroid malignancy in patients with thyroid nodules. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with thyroid nodules without a prior history of cancer enrolled in a prospective, 1-year study in which blood was drawn for ctDNA analysis prior to undergoing fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of thyroid nodules. The ctDNA panel consisted of 96-mutations in 9 cancer driver genes. The primary outcome measures were the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of our ctDNA panel for the diagnosis of thyroid malignancy as determined by pathologic and/or molecular tissue examination. RESULTS: Results from 10 subjects could not be determined due to inadequate volume or technical issues. The final classifications of the thyroid nodules were 13 malignant and 43 benign lesions. A KRAS G12V mutation was detected in the plasma of 1 patient with stage IVA papillary carcinoma whose tissue contained the same mutation. Two of the 43 patients with benign lesions also had ctDNA detected, giving a sensitivity of 7.7%, specificity of 95.35%, PPV of 33.33%, and NPV of 77.35%. There were no significant differences between benign or malignant lesions in cfDNA levels. CONCLUSION: Neither cfDNA measurements nor our panel of ctDNA mutations are sensitive or specific enough to provide valuable information over FNAB. An expanded panel and the inclusion of proteomics may improve sensitivity and specificity for thyroid cancer detection. ABBREVIATIONS: cfDNA = cell-free DNA; ctDNA = circulating tumor DNA; FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/diagnosis , Adenoma, Oxyphilic/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Papillary/diagnosis , Circulating Tumor DNA/blood , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/blood , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/genetics , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/pathology , Adenoma, Oxyphilic/blood , Adenoma, Oxyphilic/genetics , Adenoma, Oxyphilic/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Carcinoma, Papillary/blood , Carcinoma, Papillary/genetics , Carcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Circulating Tumor DNA/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary , Thyroid Neoplasms/blood , Thyroid Neoplasms/genetics , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Nodule/blood , Thyroid Nodule/genetics , Thyroid Nodule/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is the validation and proof of clinical relevance of a novel electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) for the determination of serum calcitonin (CT) in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and in different diseases of the thyroid and of calcium homeostasis. METHODS: This was a multicenter prospective study on basal serum CT concentrations performed in 9 US and European referral institutions. In addition, stimulated CT concentrations were measured in 50 healthy volunteers after intravenous calcium administration (2.5 mg/kg bodyweight). RESULTS: In total, 1929 patients and healthy controls were included. Limits of blank, detection, and quantification for the ECLIA were 0.3, 0.5, and 1 ng/L, respectively. Highest intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 7.4% (CT concentration, 0.8 ng/L) and 7.0% (1.1 ng/L), respectively. Medians (interval) of serum CT concentrations in 783 healthy controls were 0.8 ng/L (<0.5-12.7) and 3 ng/L (<0.5-18) for females and males, respectively (97.5th percentile, 6.8 and 11.6 ng/L, respectively). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 100%/97.1% and 96.2%/96.4%, for female/males, respectively. Patients (male/female) with primary hyperparathyroidism, renal failure, and neuroendocrine tumors showed CT concentrations >97.5th percentile in 33%/4.7%, 18.5%/10%, and 8.3%/12%, females/males, respectively. Peak serum CT concentrations were reached 2 min after calcium administration (161.7 and 111.8 ng/L in males and females, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Excellent analytical performance, low interindividual variability, and low impact of confounders for increased CT concentrations in non-MTC patients indicate that the investigated assay has appropriate clinical utility. Calcium-stimulated CT results suggest good test applicability owing to low interindividual variability.
Subject(s)
Calcitonin/blood , Immunoassay/methods , Immunoassay/standards , Adult , Automation, Laboratory/instrumentation , Automation, Laboratory/standards , Calcium/administration & dosage , Europe , Female , Humans , Immunoassay/trends , Male , Prospective Studies , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , United StatesABSTRACT
The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) convened their first Workshop for recommendations to optimize Clinical Practice Algorithm (CPA) development for Latin America (LA) in diabetes (focusing on glycemic control), obesity (focusing on weight loss), thyroid (focusing on thyroid nodule diagnostics), and bone (focusing on postmenopausal osteoporosis) on February 28, 2015, in San Jose, Costa Rica. A standardized methodology is presented incorporating various transculturalization factors: resource availability (including imaging equipment and approved pharmaceuticals), health care professional and patient preferences, lifestyle variables, socio-economic parameters, web-based global accessibility, electronic implementation, and need for validation protocols. A standardized CPA template with node-specific recommendations to assist the local transculturalization process is provided. Participants unanimously agreed on the following five overarching principles for LA: (1) there is only one level of optimal endocrine care, (2) hemoglobin A1C should be utilized at every level of diabetes care, (3) nutrition education and increased pharmaceutical options are necessary to optimize the obesity care model, (4) quality neck ultrasound must be part of an optimal thyroid nodule care model, and (5) more scientific evidence is needed on osteoporosis prevalence and cost to justify intervention by governmental health care authorities. This 2015 AACE/ACE Workshop marks the beginning of a structured activity that assists local experts in creating culturally sensitive, evidence-based, and easy-to-implement tools for optimizing endocrine care on a global scale.
Subject(s)
Algorithms , Culture , Endocrinology/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Consensus , Costa Rica , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Endocrinology/education , Endocrinology/organization & administration , Humans , Latin America , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/therapy , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/therapy , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To present an overview of the barriers to the implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in thyroid cancer management and to introduce a computer-based clinical support system. DATA SOURCES: PubMed. REVIEW METHODS: A review of studies on adherence to CPGs was conducted. RESULTS: Awareness and adoption of CPGs is low in thyroid cancer management. Barriers to implementation include unfamiliarity with the CPGs and financial concerns. Effective interventions to improve adherence are possible, especially when they are readily accessible at the point of care delivery. Computerized clinical support systems show particular promise. The authors introduce the clinical decision making modules (CDMMs) of the Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative, a thyroid cancer-specific electronic health record. These computer-based modules can assist clinicians with implementation of these recommendations in clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Computer-based support systems can help clinicians understand and adopt the thyroid cancer CPGs. By integrating patient characteristics and guidelines at the point of care delivery, the CDMMs can improve adherence to the guidelines and help clinicians provide high-quality, evidence-based, and individualized patient care in the management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Laryngoscope, 126:2640-2645, 2016.
Subject(s)
Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Guideline Adherence , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Thyroid Neoplasms , HumansABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The dramatic increase in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is primarily a result of early diagnosis of small cancers. Active surveillance is a promising management strategy for papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs). However, as this management strategy gains traction in the U.S., it is imperative that patients and clinicians be properly educated, patients be followed for life, and appropriate tools be identified to implement the strategy. METHODS: We review previous active surveillance studies and the parameters used to identify patients who are good candidates for active surveillance. We also review some of the challenges to implementing active surveillance protocols in the U.S. and discuss how these might be addressed. RESULTS: Trials of active surveillance support nonsurgical management as a viable and safe management strategy. However, numerous challenges exist, including the need for adherence to protocols, education of patients and physicians, and awareness of the impact of this strategy on patient psychology and quality of life. The Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative (TCCC) is a portable record keeping system that can manage a mobile patient population undergoing active surveillance. CONCLUSION: With proper patient selection, organization, and patient support, active surveillance has the potential to be a long-term management strategy for select patients with PTMC. In order to address the challenges and opportunities for this approach to be successfully implemented in the U.S., it will be necessary to consider psychological and quality of life, cultural differences, and the patient's clinical status.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Papillary/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Papillary/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Population Surveillance/methods , Thyroid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Thyroid Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Papillary/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Health Plan Implementation/organization & administration , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Quality of Life , Thyroid Neoplasms/economics , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Molecular testing for oncogenic mutations or gene expression in fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) from thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology identifies a subset of benign or malignant lesions with high predictive value. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate a novel diagnostic algorithm combining mutation detection and miRNA expression to improve the diagnostic yield of molecular cytology. SETTING: Surgical specimens and preoperative FNAs (n = 638) were tested for 17 validated gene alterations using the miRInform Thyroid test and with a 10-miRNA gene expression classifier generating positive (malignant) or negative (benign) results. DESIGN: Cross-sectional sampling of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) or follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN) cytology (n = 109) was conducted at 12 endocrinology centers across the United States. Qualitative molecular results were compared with surgical histopathology to determine diagnostic performance and model clinical effect. RESULTS: Mutations were detected in 69% of nodules with malignant outcome. Among mutation-negative specimens, miRNA testing correctly identified 64% of malignant cases and 98% of benign cases. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the combined algorithm was 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73-97%) and 85% (95% CI, 75-92%), respectively. At 32% cancer prevalence, 61% of the molecular results were benign with a negative predictive value of 94% (95% CI, 85-98%). Independently of variations in cancer prevalence, the test increased the yield of true benign results by 65% relative to mRNA-based gene expression classification and decreased the rate of avoidable diagnostic surgeries by 69%. CONCLUSIONS: Multiplatform testing for DNA, mRNA, and miRNA can accurately classify benign and malignant thyroid nodules, increase the diagnostic yield of molecular cytology, and further improve the preoperative risk-based management of benign nodules with AUS/FLUS or FN/SFN cytology.
Subject(s)
DNA/genetics , MicroRNAs/genetics , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , RNA, Messenger/genetics , Thyroid Nodule/genetics , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Algorithms , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Cross-Sectional Studies , DNA/analysis , Female , Humans , Male , MicroRNAs/analysis , Middle Aged , Preoperative Period , RNA, Messenger/analysis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thyroid Neoplasms/genetics , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Thyroid Nodule/surgery , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Health registries have become extremely powerful tools for cancer research. Unfortunately, certain details and the ability to adapt to new information are necessarily limited in current registries, and they cannot address many controversial issues in cancer management. This is of particular concern in differentiated thyroid cancer, which is rapidly increasing in incidence and has many unknowns related to optimal treatment and surveillance recommendations. SUMMARY: In this study, we review different types of health registries used in cancer research in the United States, with a focus on their advantages and disadvantages as related to the study of thyroid cancer. This analysis includes population-based cancer registries, health systems-based cancer registries, and patient-based disease registries. It is important that clinicians understand the way data are collected in, as well as the composition of, these different registries in order to more critically interpret the clinical research that is conducted using that data. In an attempt to address shortcoming of current databases for thyroid cancer, we present the potential of an innovative web-based disease management tool for thyroid cancer called the Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative (TCCC) to become a patient-based registry that can be used to evaluate and improve the quality of care delivered to patients with thyroid cancer as well as to answer questions that we have not been able to address with current databases and registries. CONCLUSION: A cancer registry that follows a specific patient, is integrated into physician workflow, and collects data across different treatment sites and different payers does not exist in the current fragmented system of healthcare in the United States. The TCCC offers physicians who treat thyroid cancer numerous time-saving and quality improvement services, and could significantly improve patient care. With rapid adoption across the nation, the TCCC could become a new paradigm for database research in thyroid cancer to improve our understanding of thyroid cancer management.
Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Registries , Thyroid Neoplasms/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Humans , Incidence , ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Appropriate management of well-differentiated thyroid cancer requires treating clinicians to have access to critical elements of the patient's presentation, surgical management, postoperative course, and pathologic assessment. Electronic health records (EHRs) provide an effective method for the storage and transmission of patient information, although most commercially available EHRs are not intended to be disease-specific. In addition, there are significant challenges for the sharing of relevant clinical information when providers involved in the care of a patient with thyroid cancer are not connected by a common EHR. In 2012, the American Thyroid Association (ATA) defined the critical elements for optimal interclinician communication in a position paper entitled, "The Essential Elements of Interdisciplinary Communication of Perioperative Information for Patients Undergoing Thyroid Cancer Surgery." SUMMARY: We present a field-by-field comparison of the ATA's essential elements as applied to three contemporary electronic reporting systems: the Thyroid Surgery e-Form from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), the Alberta WebSMR from the University of Calgary, and the Thyroid Cancer Care Collaborative (TCCC). The MSKCC e-form fulfills 21 of 32 intraoperative fields and includes an additional 14 fields not specifically mentioned in the ATA's report. The Alberta WebSMR fulfills 45 of 82 preoperative and intraoperative fields outlined by the ATA and includes 13 additional fields. The TCCC fulfills 117 of 120 fields outlined by the ATA and includes 23 additional fields. CONCLUSIONS: Effective management of thyroid cancer is a highly collaborative, multidisciplinary effort. The patient information that factors into clinical decisions about thyroid cancer is complex. For these reasons, EHRs are particularly favorable for the management of patients with thyroid cancer. The MSKCC Thyroid Surgery e-Form, the Alberta WebSMR, and the TCCC each meet all of the general recommendations for effective reporting of the specific domains that they cover in the management of thyroid cancer, as recommended by the ATA. However, the TCCC format is the most comprehensive. The TCCC is a new Web-based disease-specific database to enhance communication of patient information between clinicians in a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant manner. We believe the easy-to-use TCCC format will enhance clinician communication while providing portability of thyroid cancer information for patients.
Subject(s)
Access to Information , Electronic Health Records/standards , Interdisciplinary Communication , Interinstitutional Relations , Medical Record Linkage/standards , Patient Care Team/standards , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Cell Differentiation , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Perioperative Period , Prognosis , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The use of high-resolution ultrasound (US) imaging is a mainstay of the initial evaluation and long-term management of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. To fully capitalize on the diagnostic capabilities of a US examination in the context of thyroid disease, many clinicians consider it desirable to establish a universal format and standard of US reporting. The goals of this interdisciplinary consensus statement are twofold. First, to create a standardized set of US features to characterize thyroid nodules and cervical lymph nodes accurately, and second, to create a standardized system for tracking sequential changes in the US examination of thyroid nodules and cervical lymph nodes for the purpose of determining risk of malignancy. SUMMARY: The Thyroid, Head and Neck Cancer (THANC) Foundation convened a panel of nine specialists from a variety of medical disciplines that are actively involved in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. Consensus was achieved on the following topics: US evaluation of the thyroid gland, US evaluation of thyroid nodules, US evaluation of cervical lymph nodes, US-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules, and US-guided FNA of cervical lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: We propose that this statement represents a consensus within a multidisciplinary team on the salient and essential elements of a comprehensive and clinically significant thyroid and neck US report with regards to content, terminology, and organization. This reporting protocol supplements previous US performance guidelines by not only capturing categories of findings that may have important clinical implications, but also delineating findings that are clinically relevant within those categories as specifically as possible. Additionally, we have included the specific features of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions that have not been previously addressed.