A multicenter case series documenting Medicare Part D plan denials of immunosuppressant drug coverage for organ transplant recipients.

Medicare Part D plans make coverage decisions according to FDA-labeled indications and off-label uses endorsed by two CMS-recognized compendia. Patients who rely on Medicare Part D for immunosuppressive drug coverage are at risk for denied coverage when these medications are prescribed off-label. The purpose of this multicenter collaboration was to assemble a case series documenting situations where immunosuppressive therapies prescribed for transplant patients were denied by Medicare Part D prescription drug plans. This case series documents 66 instances in 39 patients where immunosuppressive drug claims were denied coverage due to off-label use not endorsed by the compendia. Patients were recipients of lung (n = 28, 72%), heart (n = 7, 18%), or liver (n = 4, 10%) transplants. Denied claims were for mycophenolate mofetil (n = 22, 33%), azathioprine (n = 18, 27%), sirolimus (n = 15, 23%), mycophenolate sodium (n = 5, 8%), everolimus (n = 5, 8%), and belatacept (n = 1, 1%). Most denials were upheld across all the levels of attempted appeal, including those escalated to a Medicare Administrative Law Judge. This case series demonstrates a critical flaw in the construct of the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit. The currently referenced compendia are not up to date and do not reflect best practices in organ transplantation.

Discharge medication procurement and education after kidney transplantation.

Adherence to immunosuppressant medications is a key determinant of success following organ transplantation. Medication procurement and education are precursory. In March 2018, Medicare announced a rule change interpreted to prohibit delivery of Part B-covered immunosuppressive drugs to hospitals. A subsequent Medicare announcement clarified that immunosuppressive drug delivery to hospitals is acceptable, effective April 2019. To promulgate the perceived importance of medication delivery to hospitals among key providers of transplant discharge education, a 25-question descriptive survey was distributed between May and July 2018 to pharmacists affiliated with each active US kidney transplant program (n = 238). Survey goals were to describe discharge medication procurement practices, discharge medication teaching practices, and attitudes toward the value of medication education. A total of 155 responses were received from 115 different transplant centers. A majority (93%) of respondents require discharge medications to be onsite prior to hospital discharge. A majority (81%) of respondents use discharge medications during medication education. Acquisition of immunosuppressant medications and their delivery to the inpatient environment prior to discharge for the purpose of medication education is a common practice, is viewed as important, and serves to enhance discharge education, ensure safe transitions of care, and encourage medication adherence.

Rapid and strong de novo donor-specific antibody development in a lung transplant recipient: Short communication/case report.

A 66-yo female patient (typed B*39:01, 44:02) underwent first left single lung transplant (typed B*81:01, 15:17) on 02/07/2016 with negative for DSA in current and historical samples. On 02/17/2016 strong de novo DSA (MFI=15,200, C1q+) to B81 were detected. The recipient has two children typed B*07:02, 44:02 B*27:03, 39:01, and had received multiple vaccinations. Twinrix, Zostavax and MMR vaccines contain viruses grown on live human lung fibroblasts (MRC-5, typed B*07:02, 44:02, and WI-38, typed B*08:01, 58:01). Each dose of vaccine used for injection is known to contain protein components of fibroblasts including HLA. Most likely rapid de novo DSA development is due to booster effect produced by five exposures to mismatched B locus alleles which share the following epitopes: 70IAQ, 65QIA, 65QIA+76esn, 69aa+80n, and 163ew+73te. The later three consist of paired non-self and self eplets. Although likelihood of bystander effect produced by multiple vaccinations is low its impact cannot be ruled out.