Short lasting transient effects of a capsaicin 8% patch on nociceptor activation in humans.

BACKGROUND: At high concentration, the TRPV-1 agonist capsaicin de-sensitizes nociceptors and reduces the intra-epidermal nerve density. METHODS: We investigated the effects of a 5 × 10 cm capsaicin 8% patch on C- and A-delta-nociceptor activation in ten healthy subjects before and at days 1-3-7-21 after patch application. Thermal thresholds, infrared thulium-YAG laser-evoked potentials (LEP) and heat pain (numeric rating scale, NRS, 0-10), electrically induced pain (10 pulses, 1.5-fold pain threshold intensity, five randomized series of 5-10-20-50-100 Hz), and axon-reflex flare (laser Doppler imaging) were recorded. RESULTS: Thermal hypoesthesia developed upon capsaicin 8% treatment. Warmth detection thresholds increased at day 1-3, heat pain thresholds were increased by about 2.6 °C after day 3, and laser-evoked heat pain remained significantly reduced for 7 days. Axon-reflex flare responses (days 1-3), but not supra-threshold electrically induced pain were significantly reduced by the capsaicin patch. CONCLUSIONS: Axonal nociceptor function assessed by electrical excitability tests supplements threshold tests of nociceptive endings. The differential analgesic effects of 8% capsaicin patches may be attributed to the kinetics of capsaicin and the different depth of nociceptive nerve fibres, yet, the time course does not match the long-lasting analgesia observed in neuropathic pain patients treated with the same patch. WHAT DOES THIS STUDY ADD?: Axonal nociceptor function assessed by supra-threshold electrical excitability tests did not coincide with capsaicin-induced transduction changes supplementing threshold measures of terminal nociceptor endings. Threshold measurements do not reflect the sustained effect of pain relief seen in neuropathic pain patients. Capsaicin-sensitive nociceptors responsible for spontaneous pain are either not specifically tested with currently available sensory stimulation protocols or have higher capsaicin sensitivity or slower recovery under neuropathic conditions.

Exploratory study of once-daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as a treatment for auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Auditory hallucinations are resistant to pharmacotherapy in about 25% of adults with schizophrenia. Treatment with noninvasive brain stimulation would provide a welcomed additional tool for the clinical management of auditory hallucinations. A recent study found a significant reduction in auditory hallucinations in people with schizophrenia after five days of twice-daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) that simultaneously targeted left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left temporo-parietal cortex. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that once-daily tDCS with stimulation electrodes over left frontal and temporo-parietal areas reduces auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study that evaluated five days of daily tDCS of the same cortical targets in 26 outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder with auditory hallucinations. RESULTS: We found a significant reduction in auditory hallucinations measured by the Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (F2,50=12.22, P<0.0001) that was not specific to the treatment group (F2,48=0.43, P=0.65). No significant change of overall schizophrenia symptom severity measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of efficacy of tDCS for treatment of auditory hallucinations and the pronounced response in the sham-treated group in this study contrasts with the previous finding and demonstrates the need for further optimization and evaluation of noninvasive brain stimulation strategies. In particular, higher cumulative doses and higher treatment frequencies of tDCS together with strategies to reduce placebo responses should be investigated. Additionally, consideration of more targeted stimulation to engage specific deficits in temporal organization of brain activity in patients with auditory hallucinations may be warranted.