Radiographic features of vertically fractured endodontically treated mesial roots of mandibular molars.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the most frequent radiographic appearance of bony lesions around endodontically treated vertically fractured mesial roots of mandibular molars. STUDY DESIGN: For the study, 49 extracted mesial roots with vertical fractures (study group) were evaluated and compared to 52 extracted roots without fractures (control). RESULTS: The "halo" (36.7%) and "periodontal" (28.6%) type radiolucencies were the most typical appearances of periradicular areas around the mesial roots of mandibular molars with vertical root fractures. By itself, bifurcation radiolucency was statistically insignificant (6.1%), however in conjunction with other areas of radiolucency, it was significant (63.3%, P < .0378). No radiolucency (38.5%) and periapical radiolucency (32.7%) were predominant features in the control (nonfractured roots). Amalgam dowel in the coronal part (1-2 mm) of the root was found in 67.3% of the vertically fractured roots (P < .0006). Defined but not corticated (57.2%) or diffuse (32.6%) borders were typical for vertically fractured mesial roots. CONCLUSIONS: The use of significant variables, such as "periodontal" and "halo" bony radiolucencies, bifurcation involvement, and the presence of amalgam dowel, has prediction sensitivity of 77.6% (VRF group) and specificity of 82.7% (nonfractured roots).

Ultrasound identification and quantitative measurement of blood supply to the anterior part of the mandible.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies suggest that the main blood supply to the bony chin may be through a single arterial branch of the 2 sublingual arteries that anastomose at the midline and penetrate the bone through the lingual foramen, approximately 13 mm from the lower border of the mandible. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the validity of this hypothesis in vivo, to identify clinically the main blood supply to the bony chin, and to measure its parameters: diameter of vessel, direction of flow, and its volume. Materials and method Ultrasound/doppler measurements and periapical radiographs were taken on 20 healthy volunteers, randomly divided into 2 equal groups in order to compare the method's validity. In the first group, the lingual foramen was identified on periapical radiographs and then ultrasound/doppler measurements were performed. In the second group, this procedure was reversed. RESULTS: Positive identification of the lingual foramina on the periapical radiograph was obtained in 13 subjects compared to 20 subjects by ultrasound/doppler examination. Blood volume measurements were obtained in only 17 subjects. The diameter of the artery was 0.18-1.8 mm and the blood flow from 0.7-3.7 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound/doppler imaging is a reliable method to visualize and measure the blood supply to the bony chin. It can become an important tool in presurgical assessment of patients who undergo genioplastic procedures, vestibuloplasty, or insertion of dental implants.

A retrospective radiographic study of root-end surgery with amalgam and intermediate restorative material.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare amalgam with intermediate restorative material in terms of their effectiveness as root-end filling materials during root-end surgeries. STUDY DESIGN: A root-end operation was performed on 228 patients with 262 endodontically treated teeth with periapical lesions. Of these teeth, 122 from 101 patients were available for follow-up. Radiographs were taken immediately postoperatively and again at a mean of 11.25 months (range, 6-45 months) postoperatively. The radiographs were digitized, and the diameter of the periapical lesion was measured by means of a computerized system. The mesiodistal distance at the cementoenamel junction served as an internal standard. Radiographic findings were classified into 1 of 3 groups: complete healing, incomplete healing, or unsatisfactory (no) healing. RESULTS: Complete healing was observed in 44.3% of the teeth, incomplete healing in 21.3%, and unsatisfactory healing in 34.4%. No statistical significance was found for amalgam versus intermediate restorative material, but teeth that underwent additional operations had a significantly worse success rate than those that underwent only first-time operations. No correlation was found between the subjective prognosis by the surgeons and the long-term outcome. CONCLUSION: As root-end filling materials, amalgam and intermediate restorative material had the same clinical effectiveness. The classic root-end operation is unpredictable. Reoperations should be reconsidered and avoided if possible.

Use of dental implants in patients with Down syndrome: a case report.

Down syndrome is caused by trisomy of the 21st chromosome and is associated with well-described physical and systemic problems. Most people with Down syndrome have some degree of mental retardation as well as malformation of head and neck. Oral structures that are commonly affected include the tongue (macroglossia), abnormalities in the number and shape of teeth, and poor quality (osteoporotic-like) of alveolar bone and jaw. These oral malformations as well as a tendency toward poor cooperation in the dental office contribute to the belief among dentists that people with Down syndrome are not good candidates for oral rehabilitation with dental implants. This article describes the use of dental implants in the oral rehabilitation of a 16-year-old boy with Down syndrome. Although more experience is needed before dental implants can be considered a suitable option during oral rehabilitation in people with Down syndrome, this case report shows a promising beginning.