Predictors of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: Insights from a real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate factors associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and CMV disease and its impact on post-transplant outcomes including overall survival (OS) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT). METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study including 452 Allo-SCT recipients (matched unrelated donor, MUD 61%; haploidentical, haplo 39%) from 2016 to 2021. Data were analyzed using SPSS v28. Descriptive (chi-square and t-test), Kaplan-Meier and regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The median age was 57 years. Sixty-one percent were males and 84.3% were Caucasians. CMV serostatus was positive in 59.1% of recipients. The median follow-up was 24.4 months. CMV viremia and CMV disease were observed in 181 (40%) and 32 (7%) patients, respectively. Among CMV seropositive recipients, 65% developed CMV viremia and 11% were noted to have CMV disease compared to 4% and 1% in seronegative recipients, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with CMV disease had significantly lower OS than those without CMV disease (median 14.1 months vs. not reached, p = 0.024); however, OS was not associated with CMV viremia (median not reached in both groups, p = 0.640). Letermovir prophylaxis was used in 66% (n = 176/267) of CMV seropositive recipients, but no impact was observed on the incidence of CMV viremia or CMV disease and OS. CONCLUSIONS: CMV disease leads to significantly inferior survival after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Recipient CMV seropositive status was associated with the risk of CMV viremia and CMV disease, and this was not abrogated with the use of Letermovir prophylaxis.

Outcomes with HLA-matched unrelated donor versus haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation.

We investigated the outcomes after adult haploidentical (haplo) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in a single-center study (n = 452) including 276 MUD and 176 haplo transplants. Myeloablative (37%) and reduced-intensity conditioning (63%) were performed. Graft sources included peripheral blood (50%) and bone marrow (50%). GVHD prophylaxis included tacrolimus/methotrexate (53%) and post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based (47%). In MUD versus haplo HCT recipients, a similar incidence of neutrophil engraftment (18 vs 17 days, p = 0.895), grade II-IV acute GVHD (51% vs 50%, p = 0.773), relapse (26% vs 23%, p = 0.578), non-relapse mortality (22% vs 23%, p = 0.817), 1-year disease-free survival (62% vs 63%. p = 0.921), and 1-year overall survival (73% vs 74%, p = 0.744) were observed. Earlier platelet engraftment (22 vs 27 days, p < 0.001) and higher chronic GVHD (45% vs 35%, p = 0.040) were noted in MUD as compared to haplo HCT. Allogeneic transplantation should be done promptly whenever indicated, utilizing either matched unrelated or haploidentical donors.

Exploring the High-Grade and Refractory Neurotoxicity of Teclistamab: An Underreported Entity.

T-cell re-directing bispecific antibodies targeting B-cell maturation antigens have recently entered real-world use in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. While no head-to-head comparison has been done, they have generally been observed to have lower-grade toxicities compared with their chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) counterparts. However, in our real-world, single-institution experience, we have encountered two patients receiving teclistamab who experienced high-grade and refractory immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) that did not respond to traditional toxicity mitigation strategies of high-dose corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive therapies. As we increase our use of these novel and vital agents, caution must be warranted.

Lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic: outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in hematopoietic cell transplant and cell therapy recipients.

We investigated the outcomes after Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) or chimeric antigen receptor-T cell (CART) therapy recipients in a single-centre study including all (n = 261)HCT/CART recipients (allogeneic-HCT 49%, autologous-HCT 40%, CART 11%). The median age was 60 (22-80) years. COVID severity was mild (74%), moderate (11%), and severe/critical (16%) with a mortality rate of 7% and a median duration of infection of 5.7 weeks. Significant predictors of COVID severe disease or mortality included concurrent infection (HR 14.9, 95% CI 2.2-5.6) and immunosuppressive therapy (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.2-3.4).HCT/CART recipients have a higher risk of mortality with COVID and warrant vigilant interventions.

Imaging Biomarkers to Predict Outcomes in Patients With Large B-Cell Lymphoma With a Day 28 Partial Response by 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging Following CAR-T Therapy.

BACKGROUND: CD19 directed CAR-T therapy for Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has shown great therapeutic response in patients with relapsed/refractory disease with response rates of 60-80%. However, in patients with a partial response (PR) on initial day 28 post CAR-T therapy imaging, clinical uncertainty remains as half of these patients will ultimately have relapsed disease.   PATIENTS: In 24 patients receiving CD19 directed CAR-T therapy for relapsed/refractory LBCL achieving a PR on day 28, we utilize imaging biomarkers by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging at pre CAR-T therapy baseline and day 28 to determine factors that may predict best overall response (B-OR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).   METHODS: Out of 75 patients receiving CAR-T therapy at a single institution, we retrospectively identified and reviewed 25 (33%) as achieving a PR on day 28. PR was defined using the 2014 Lugano classification system. All patients received standard of care CD19 directed CAR-T therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel. Two independent nuclear medicine physicians measured baseline (pre-CAR-T therapy) and day 28 PET/CT SUVmax, SUVmean and TMV (cm3) of each lesion (node, organ or marrow uptake, if any) using ROVER software. All statistical tests were two-sided and conducted at the 0.05 level of significance. R version 1.3.1099 (R-studio) was used for statistical modeling.   CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that a higher day 28 SUVmax was significantly higher in those with a B-OR of PR and in our modeling, a lower day 28 SUVmax may predict favorable PFS and OS. Additionally, lower TMV, both at baseline and day 28, may also be predictive of longer PFS and OS, while lower TLG at baseline, but not day 28 is significantly associated with a B-OR of CR. While further study is warranted, these imaging biomarkers may allow for early identification of those with a day 28 PR at highest risk for relapse leading to early intervention to improve long term outcomes.

Outcomes with chimeric antigen receptor t-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes following chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (RR-AML). Methods: We performed a literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov. After screening 677 manuscripts, 13 studies were included. Data was extracted following PRISMA guidelines. Pooled analysis was done using the meta-package by Schwarzer et al. Proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. Results: We analyzed 57 patients from 10 clinical trials and 3 case reports. The pooled complete and overall response rates were 49.5% (95% CI 0.18-0.81, I2 =65%) and 65.2% (95% CI 0.36-0.91, I2 =57%). The pooled incidence of cytokine release syndrome, immune-effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome, and graft-versus-host disease was estimated as 54.4% (95% CI 0.17-0.90, I2 =77%), 3.9% (95% CI 0.00-0.19, I2 =22%), and 1.6% (95%CI 0.00-0.21, I2 =33%), respectively. Conclusion: CAR-T therapy has demonstrated modest efficacy in RR-AML. Major challenges include heterogeneous disease biology, lack of a unique targetable antigen, and immune exhaustion.

Second-line treatment with CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma.

The landscape for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has continued to evolve. However, challenges continue to exist, particularly in patients who do not respond to first-line anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and anthracycline-based therapy or those who experience early relapse. In such patients, the treatment paradigm has changed little in the past 2 decades, with salvage chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant resulting in historical durable response rates of approximately 40%. Given the success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in the third- or later-line in the R/R LBCL setting, 3 recent clinical trials (ZUMA-7, BELINDA, and TRANSFORM) have sought to address the clinical need for improved therapies in the high-risk second-line setting for primary R/R disease in the first 12 months. In this review, we analyze these 3 pivotal trials with a focus on clinical trial design, CAR T-cell product attributes, efficacy data, safety data, and patient-reported outcomes when compared with standard of care.

Outcomes of Busulfan, Fludarabine, and 400 cGy Total Body Irradiation Compared With Busulfan and Fludarabine Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients With Hematologic Diseases: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens decrease the risk for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in adult patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies but increase the risk for relapse. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of fludarabine-total body irradiation (TBI) with fludarabine among patients with hematologic diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study of 137 patients with different hematologic malignancies compared the outcomes of 63 patients who received a conventional RIC regimen with 2 days of IV busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/d × 2 days) and fludarabine with 74 patients who received the same regimen plus 400 cGy of fludarabine and busulfan (FB)-TBI divided in 2 doses over 1 day (200 cGy BID). Median follow-up was 4.62 years. RESULTS: The donors were either HLA-matched siblings (36%) or HLA-matched unrelated donors (64%). The FB-TBI showed trends toward improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over FB (5-year PFS rates 50% vs 34%, P = .06, and 5-year OS rate 53% vs 39%, P = .13). Acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD), relapse, and NRM were similar between the 2 groups. The 5-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was lower in the FB-TBI group compared with the FB group (29% vs 52%, P = .003). Multivariable analysis revealed that grade III-IV aGVHD was the only independent risk factor for worse OS (P = .001) in both groups. A high disease risk index was possibly associated with inferior OS (P = .07) in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The FB-TBI is a safe and effective intensified RIC regimen for adult patients with hematologic malignancies. It predicted a lower risk for cGVHD and showed possibly improved PFS and OS compared with FB.

Ocular adverse events associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: a case series and review.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapy has been shown to improve the remission rate and survival for patients with refractory haematological malignancies. The aim of this study is to describe ocular adverse effects associated with CAR T therapy in patients with haematological malignancies. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-institution, case series. Patients aged 18 years or older who received standard of care CAR T therapy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma with a documented ophthalmic evaluation were included. The primary outcome was clinician ophthalmic examination findings. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients received CAR T-cell therapy from February 2018 to October 2019 with 11 receiving an ophthalmic examination. Eleven patients (n=22 eyes) who received CAR T-cell therapy were included in review. The median time from CAR T-cell infusion date to ocular examination was 57.5 days. The median patient age at the time of examination was 60.5 years. Ten patients had subjective symptoms prompting ophthalmic examination. Two patients reported floaters and photopsias. One patient had worsening ocular graft-versus-host disease. Two patients were identified with possible reactivation of viral infections, including herpes zoster ophthalmicus and regressing acute retinal necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing use of CAR T therapy for malignancies underscores the importance of ophthalmologists and oncologists understanding the potential toxicities associated with its use, particularly ocular toxicities and when to refer for an ophthalmic examination.

Use of endpoints in phase III randomized controlled trials for acute myeloid leukemia over the last 15 years: a systematic review.

We systematically evaluated the primary and secondary endpoints used in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included 238 phase III AML RCTs in the past 15 years that reported 279 primary endpoints and 657 secondary endpoints. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), and complete remission (CR) were primary endpoints in 120 (43%), 34 (12%), 30 (11%), and 41 (15%) studies, respectively. OS (12.5%), PFS (13.2%), CR (14%), safety (11%), and EFS (9%) were commonly reported secondary endpoints. Among primary endpoints, a higher use of OS (OR 2.03, 95%CI 1.10-3.75, p = 0.023) and lower use of PFS (OR 0.25, 95%CI 0.12-0.52, p < 0.001) was observed from 2014 to 2021 compared to 2006-2013; CR was frequently used in relapsed/refractory compared to frontline RCTs (OR 2.20, 95%CI 1.11-4.38, p = 0.025); EFS was frequently used in frontline compared to relapsed/refractory AML RCTs (OR 10.11, 95%CI 1.34-76.34, p = 0.025). A higher trend in the use of clinically meaningful and objective endpoint of OS over the last 15 years.

Low utility of the H-Score and HLH-2004 criteria to identify patients with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis after CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma.

Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a life-threatening immune dysregulation disorder. Use of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) is associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) and secondary HLH. However, application of HLH scoring systems (H-score, HLH-2004 criteria) are not validated in this setting. We analyzed the utility of applying the H-score and the HLH-2004 criteria to identify patients with possible HLH post-CAR-T for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma. Only two of four patients with post CAR-T HLH met five or more of the diagnostic criteria for HLH by HLH 2004 criteria. In contrast all four post CAR-T HLH patients had a high H-score (>169); however, an additional ten patients that did not have HLH also had a high H-score. Thus, in this patient population, both scoring systems were demonstrated to have low prognostic significance in differentiating between high grade CRS and HLH.

Deep dissection of the antiviral immune profile of patients with COVID-19.

In light of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants potentially undermining humoral immunity, it is important to understand the fine specificity of the antiviral antibodies. We screened 20 COVID-19 patients for antibodies against 9 different SARS-CoV-2 proteins observing responses against the spike (S) proteins, the receptor-binding domain (RBD), and the nucleocapsid (N) protein which were of the IgG1 and IgG3 subtypes. Importantly, mutations which typically occur in the B.1.351 "South African" variant, significantly reduced the binding of anti-RBD antibodies. Nine of 20 patients were critically ill and were considered high-risk (HR). These patients showed significantly higher levels of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-ß) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and lower levels of CD4+ T cells expressing LAG-3 compared to standard-risk (SR) patients. HR patients evidenced significantly higher anti-S1/RBD IgG antibody levels and an increased neutralizing activity. Importantly, a large proportion of S protein-specific antibodies were glycosylation-dependent and we identified a number of immunodominant linear epitopes within the S1 and N proteins. Findings derived from this study will not only help us to identify the most relevant component of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral immune response but will also enable us to design more meaningful immunomonitoring methods for anti-COVID-19 vaccines.

Targeting the CD27-CD70 Pathway to Improve Outcomes in Both Checkpoint Immunotherapy and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) represent two distinct modalities that offer a chance for long-term cure in a diverse array of malignancies and have experienced many breakthroughs in recent years. Herein, we review the CD27-CD70 co-stimulatory pathway and its therapeutic potential in 1) combination with checkpoint inhibitor and other immune therapies and 2) its potential ability to serve as a novel approach in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention. We further review recent advances in the understanding of GVHD as a complex immune phenomenon between donor and host immune systems, particularly in the early stages with mixed chimerism, and potential novel therapeutic approaches to prevent the development of GVHD.

The impact of bridging therapy prior to CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma.

In the relapsed/refractory setting for treatment of large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as an effective treatment modality. Patients often have aggressive disease that requires prompt treatment in the form of bridging therapy (BT) for disease stabilisation while CAR-T cells are manufactured. Patients (n = 75) undergoing CAR-T therapy infusion for LBCL at our institution were identified. A total of 52 (69·3%) received BT and 23 (30·7%) received no BT (NBT). BT modalities included systemic BT (SBT) in 28 patients, radiation BT (RBT) in 14, and high-dose steroid BT (HDS) in 10. There was no difference in incidence of cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome between BT and NBT (P = 0·18 and P = 0·53 respectively). Prolonged cytopenias at Day 180 were more common in BT than NBT (50% vs. 13·3%, P = 0·04). The SBT and RBT subgroups had more cytopenias at Day 180 compared to the HDS and NBT subgroups (58·3% and 57·1% vs. 20% and 13·3% respectively, P = 0·04). Disease response at last follow-up, progression-free survival and overall survival were similar between BT, NBT, and BT subgroups. In summary, BT can be safely considered in patients undergoing CAR-T therapy. However, those undergoing BT with SBT or RBT are at higher risk of prolonged cytopenias after CAR-T therapy.

Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immune Responses in Patients Receiving an Allogeneic Stem Cell or Organ Transplant.

Patients after autologous (autoSCT) and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) are at an increased risk of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality, compounded by an immune system weakened by the underlying malignancy and prior treatments. Allogeneic transplantation, including stem cell and solid organ transplants, requires intensive immunosuppressive prophylaxis, which may further undermine the development of a protective vaccine-induced anti-viral immunity. Herein, we report on short- and long-term antiviral immune responses in two peri-stem cell transplant recipients and a third patient who received a COVID-19 vaccination after kidney transplantation. Our data indicate that: (1) patients post-alloSCT may be able to mount an anti-COVID-19 immune response; however, a sufficient time interval between transplant and exposure may be of critical importance; (2) alloSCT recipients with preexisting anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunity are at risk for losing protective humoral immunity following transplantation, particularly if the stem-cell donor lacks antiviral immunity, e.g., vaccine-derived immunity; and (3) some post-transplant patients are completely unable to build an immune response to a COVID-19 vaccine, perhaps based on the prophylactic suppression of T cell immunity.