The impact of anatomical changes during photon or proton based radiation treatment on tumor dose in glioblastoma dose escalation trials.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Most dose-escalation trials in glioblastoma patients integrate the escalated dose throughout the standard course by targeting a specific subvolume. We hypothesize that anatomical changes during irradiation may affect the dose coverage of this subvolume for both proton- and photon-based radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 24 glioblastoma patients a photon- and proton-based dose escalation treatment plan (of 75 Gy/30 fr) was simulated on the dedicated radiotherapy planning MRI obtained before treatment. The escalated dose was planned to cover the resection cavity and/or contrast enhancing lesion on the T1w post-gadolinium MRI sequence. To analyze the effect of anatomical changes during treatment, we evaluated on an additional MRI that was obtained during treatment the changes of the dose distribution on this specific high dose region. RESULTS: The median time between the planning MRI and additional MRI was 26 days (range 16-37 days). The median time between the planning MRI and start of radiotherapy was relatively short (7 days, range 3-11 days). In 3 patients (12.5%) changes were observed which resulted in a substantial deterioration of both the photon and proton treatment plans. All these patients underwent a subtotal resection, and a decrease in dose coverage of more than 5% and 10% was observed for the photon- and proton-based treatment plans, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that only for a limited number of patients anatomical changes during photon or proton based radiotherapy resulted in a potentially clinically relevant underdosage in the subvolume. Therefore, volume changes during treatment are unlikely to be responsible for the negative outcome of dose-escalation studies.

Predicting and implications of target volume changes of brain metastases during fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of target volume changes in brain metastases during fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) and identify patients that benefit from MRI guidance. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For 15 patients (18 lesions) receiving fSRS only (fSRSonly) and 19 patients (20 lesions) receiving fSRS postoperatively (fSRSpostop), a treatment planning MRI (MR0) and repeated MRI during treatment (MR1) were acquired. The impact of target volume changes on the target coverage was analyzed by evaluating the planned dose distribution (based on MR0) on the planning target volume (PTV) during treatment as defined on MR1. The predictive value of target volume changes before treatment (using the diagnostic MRI (MRD)) was studied to identify patients that experienced the largest changes during treatment. RESULTS: Target volume changes during fSRS did result in large declines of the PTV dose coverage up to -34.8% (median = 3.2%) for fSRSonly patients. For fSRSpostop the variation and declines were smaller (median PTV dose coverage change = -0.5% (-4.5% to 1.9%)). Target volumes changes did also impact the minimum dose in the PTV (fSRSonly; -2.7 Gy (-16.5 to 2.3 Gy), fSRSpostop; -0.4 Gy (-4.2 to 2.5 Gy)). Changes in target volume before treatment (i.e. seen between the MRD and MR0) predicted which patients experienced the largest dose coverage declines during treatment. CONCLUSION: Target volume changes in brain metastases during fSRS can result in worsening of the target dose coverage. Patients benefiting the most from a repeated MRI during treatment could be identified before treatment.

Plan selection strategy for rectum cancer patients: An interobserver study to assess clinical feasibility.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In radiotherapy for rectum cancer, the target volume is highly deformable. An adaptive plan selection strategy can mitigate the effect of these variations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of an adaptive strategy by assessing the interobserver variation in CBCT-based plan selection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven patients with rectum cancer, treated with a non-adaptive strategy, were selected. Five CBCT scans were available per patient. To simulate the plan selection strategy, per patient three PTVs were created by varying the anterior upper mesorectum margin. For each CBCT scan, twenty observers selected the smallest PTV that encompassed the target volume. After this initial baseline measurement, the gold standard was determined during a consensus meeting, followed by a second measurement one month later. Differences between both measurements were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: In the baseline measurement, the concordance with the gold standard was 69% (range: 60-82%), which improved to 75% (range: 60-87%) in the second measurement (p=0.01). For the second measurement, 10% of plan selections were smaller than the gold standard. CONCLUSION: With a plan selection consistency between observers of 75%, a plan selection strategy for rectum cancer patients is feasible.

Potential dosimetric benefit of an adaptive plan selection strategy for short-course radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: An adaptive plan selection strategy can account for daily target volume variations for radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients. The aim was to quantify the daily dosimetric consequences of plan selection compared to a non-adaptive approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients with rectal cancer, treated with 25Gy in five fractions to the mesorectum and pelvic lymph nodes, were selected. The adaptive strategy was simulated by creating three plans per patient, with varying upper ventral PTV margins, and selecting the smallest PTV covering the entire mesorectum on every daily CBCT scan. Subsequently, mesorectum, bladder, and bowel cavity were delineated on these scans. Daily dose-volume histograms were calculated for both the adaptive and non-adaptive plan, with a ventral PTV margin of 20mm. Coverage of the mesorectum, defined as V95%>99%, was calculated, as well as bladder and bowel cavity V95% and V15Gy. RESULTS: In one patient, mesorectum coverage improved. A reduction in bladder V95% and bowel cavity V15Gy was found, of 6.9% and 18.4cm(3) (p<0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: Plan selection for radiotherapy in rectal cancer can improve coverage of the target volume. Overall dosimetric sparing of bladder and bowel cavity was limited but could be beneficial for individual patients.

Clinical results of conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy using a focal simultaneous boost for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in elderly or medically unfit patients.

BACKGROUND: For elderly or medically unfit patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer, cystectomy or chemotherapy are contraindicated. This leaves radical radiotherapy as the only treatment option. It was the aim of this study to retrospectively analyze the treatment outcome and associated toxicity of conformal versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using a focal simultaneous tumor boost for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in patients not suitable for cystectomy. METHODS: One hundred eighteen patients with T2-4 N0-1 M0 bladder cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Median age was 80 years. Treatment consisted of either a conformal box technique or IMRT and included a simultaneous boost to the tumor. To enable an accurate boost delivery, fiducial markers were placed around the tumor. Patients were treated with 40 Gy in 20 fractions to the elective treatment volumes, and a daily tumor boost up to 55-60 Gy. RESULTS: Clinical complete response was seen in 87 % of patients. Three-year overall survival was 44 %, with a locoregional control rate of 73 % at 3 years. Toxicity was low, with late urinary and intestinal toxicity rates grade ≥ 2 of 14 and 5 %, respectively. The use of IMRT reduced late intestinal toxicity, whereas fiducial markers reduced acute urinary toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Radical radiotherapy using a focal boost is feasible and effective for elderly or unfit patients, with a 3-year locoregional control of 73 %. Toxicity rates were low, and were reduced by the use of IMRT and fiducial markers.

Evaluation of delivered dose for a clinical daily adaptive plan selection strategy for bladder cancer radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To account for variable bladder size during bladder cancer radiotherapy, a daily plan selection strategy was implemented. The aim of this study was to calculate the actually delivered dose using an adaptive strategy, compared to a non-adaptive approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ten patients were treated to the bladder and lymph nodes with an adaptive full bladder strategy. Interpolated delineations of bladder and tumor on a full and empty bladder CT scan resulted in five PTVs for which VMAT plans were created. Daily cone beam CT (CBCT) scans were used for plan selection. Bowel, rectum and target volumes were delineated on these CBCTs, and delivered dose for these was calculated using both the adaptive plan, and a non-adaptive plan. RESULTS: Target coverage for lymph nodes improved using an adaptive strategy. The full bladder strategy spared the healthy part of the bladder from a high dose. Average bowel cavity V30Gy and V40Gy significantly reduced with 60 and 69ml, respectively (p<0.01). Other parameters for bowel and rectum remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Daily plan selection compared to a non-adaptive strategy yielded similar bladder coverage and improved coverage for lymph nodes, with a significant reduction in bowel cavity V30Gy and V40Gy only, while other sparing was limited.

Reduction of heart volume during neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery is considered curative intent treatment for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. The aim was to establish hemodynamic aspects of changes in heart volume and to explore whether changes in heart volume resulted in clinically relevant changes in the dose distribution of radiotherapy. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in patients who were treated with nCRT consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel concomitant with radiotherapy (41.4 Gy/1.8 Gy per fraction). Physical parameters, cardiac volume on CT and Cone beam CT, cardiac blood markers and cardiac ultrasound were obtained. RESULTS: In 23 patients a significant decrease of 55.3 ml in heart volume was detected (95% CI 36.7-73.8 ml, p<0.001). There was a decrease in both systolic (mean decrease 18 mmHg, 95% CI 11-26 mmHg, p<0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (mean decrease 8 mmHg, 95% CI 2-14 mmHg, p=0.008) and an increase in heart rate with 6 beats/min (95% CI 1-11 beats/min, p=0.021). Except for Troponin T, no change in other cardiac markers and echocardiography parameters were observed. The change in heart volume did not result in a clinically relevant change in radiation dose distribution. CONCLUSION: Heart volume was significantly reduced, but was not accompanied by overt cardiac dysfunction. All observed changes in hemodynamic parameters are consistent with volume depletion. Adaptation of the treatment plan during the course of radiotherapy is not advocated.

Reduction in cardiac volume during chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer.

We investigated the change in cardiac volume over the course of chemoradiotherapy in 26 patients treated for esophageal cancer, using cone beam CT imaging. The cardiac volume reduced significantly, with a median reduction of 8%. A significant relationship with planned cardiac dose was not found.