Clinical and economic consequences of volume- or time-dependent intermittent catheterization in patients with spinal cord lesions and neuropathic bladder.

STUDY DESIGN: Open comparative study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of volume-dependent intermittent catheterization (VDIC) and time-dependent intermittent catheterization (TDIC) on financial burden and clinical outcomes in patients with spinal cord lesions (SCL). SETTING: Department of Spinal Rehabilitation, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital, Israel. METHOD: Economic and clinical outcomes were examined in 13 SCL patients treated with VDIC following bladder volume measurement by a portable ultrasound device (the study group), and in 11 patients treated with TDIC (the control group). Patients were followed for 12-30 days. Costs were calculated according to December 2003 prices at Loewenstein Hospital. The t-test and the Fisher's Exact Test were employed for comparisons between the groups. RESULTS: The number of catheterizations per patient per day, the time required to perform volume measurements and catheterizations, and their total cost, were approximately 44, 49, and 46% lower in the study group than in the control group. SCIMU (representing bladder management functioning) increased during the study in both groups, and the increase was 31% higher in the study group than in the control group. Urinary infection was found in three patients in the control group and in none in the study group. CONCLUSION: VDIC has economic and probably also clinical advantages over TDIC.

The role of external sphincterotomy for patients with a spinal cord lesion.

For the last three decades external sphincterotomy has been well accepted as a treatment for bladder outlet obstruction in patients with a spinal cord lesions. Recently, however, its value has been brought into question. To assess the current place of this procedure in the treatment of the neuropathic bladder of spinal origin, we studied the outcomes of sphincterotomy in 32 patients. Post-voiding residual urine volume decreased after surgery in 27 patients (84%), considerably in 22 (69%) of them. Clinical infection resolved in 14 out of 19 patients (74%), hydronephrosis disappeared in two out of three (66%), and vesicourethral reflux improved in three out of five (60%) and was cured in two (40%). Six of the patients (19%) were freed from catheterization, but two patients (6%) lost partial continence. Sphincterotomy is an important tool in the treatment of spinal patients with bladder outlet obstruction and should be considered when the proper indications exist.