[Tools to strengthen organizational health literacy in the health care sector]. / Tools zur Stärkung der organisationalen Gesundheitskompetenz in Einrichtungen der Gesundheitsversorgung.

BACKGROUND: The National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy calls for user-friendly and health-competent development of health care at all levels. After the first years of focusing on individual health literacy, the focus is increasingly on organizational health literacy. Organizational health literacy addresses different standards (e. g., management, communication, staff, users or patients) and levels in the organization (i.e., organizational, staff and user level). Numerous tools already exist to strengthen health literacy in hospitals. However, previous studies have rarely focused on a differentiated overview of tools to strengthen organizational health literacy by health literacy standards and differentiated by level of organization, staff and users. The article has two goals, one of which is to search for and review existing tools to strengthen organizational health literacy in health care institutions. In addition, selected tools for strengthening organizational health literacy for health care institutions, differentiated according to the eight fields of action and the three organizational levels (i.e., institution, staff, users), will be presented. METHOD: A search was carried out to identify tools on strengthening health literacy in facilities of health care. All the tools identified were reviewed, selected according to previously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and assigned to the level (institution, employees or patients/clients and their relatives) as well as the eight fields of action of organizational health literacy. RESULTS: We found a total of N=191 tools for health care facilities. After taking into account the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of n=60 tools were selected and differentiated according to the level and standard of organizational health literacy. Some of these tools could be assigned to more than one field of action. Most tools (n=37) were found for Standard 5 "Health-competent communication users", while the lowest number of tools were identified for Standard 7 "Promoting the health literacy of employees" (n=4). Differentiation by level (i. e., organizational, staff, patients or clients) shows that there is a smaller number of tools for employees (n=43) compared to the level of the organization (n=76) or users (n=65). DISCUSSION: Overall, the study shows that numerous tools already exist to strengthen organizational health literacy for hospitals, in particular, and for health care settings, in general. In the future, however, it will be necessary to develop and test tools for individual standards of health literate organizations in health care facilities. Further, internationally provided and tested tools have to be adapted and piloted for the German-speaking countries and health care settings in order to address the health literacy of staff, users and their relatives in a sustainable manner. CONCLUSION: The development of health literate settings requires effort from health care organizations. Thus, tools for strengthening organizational health literacy should be provided and implemented by also focusing on the level of organization, staff and users so that the individual health literacy of users can be addressed and improved in the long-run.

Organizational Health Literacy in Facilities for People with Disabilities: First Results of an Explorative Qualitative and Quantitative Study.

To date, studies on individual and organizational health literacy (OHL) in facilities for people with disabilities are scarce. Thus, the aims of this study are (1) to adapt an existing instrument for measuring organizational health literacy (OHL), namely, the "Health literate health care organization scale" (HLHO-10), to the context of facilities for people with disabilities, (2) to quantitatively examine characteristics of OHL, and (3) to qualitatively assess the definition and role of OHL by interviewing managers and skilled staff. An online study in Germany with N = 130 managers and skilled staff in facilities for people with disabilities was conducted, using the adapted HLHO-10 questionnaire. Univariate analyses were applied. Qualitative content analysis was used to investigate interview data from N = 8 managers and skilled staff from N = 8 facilities for people with disabilities in Hesse, Germany. Quantitative results revealed that respondents reported a below-average level in HLHO-10, with the lowest level found in the attribute of participative development of health information. The qualitative findings showed a clear need for improved navigation to and in facilities. The quantitative and qualitative findings are mainly consistent. Future research and measures should focus on facilities for people with disabilities in order to strengthen the development of and access to target-group-specific health information, as well as to establish a health-literate working and living environment.