Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Chem Neuroanat ; 33(1): 34-41, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17134871

ABSTRACT

The maternal environment affects fetal development and may permanently affect the physiology of the adult. Fetal growth hormone (GH) secretion is increased by maternal undernutrition but the physiological mechanisms responsible for this increase are unknown. We have recently found evidence suggesting that the GHRH component of the fetal neuroendocrine GH axis may be perturbed by undernutrition. This study sought to determine the effect of maternal undernutrition on immunocytochemically detectable GHRH neurons and the expression of GHRH receptors by somatotropes in the pituitary gland. Ewes were grouped (n=12 per group) randomly into control (fed 100% of requirements) or nutrient restricted (fed 50% of requirements) from days 28 to 78 of gestation, corresponding to the period from implantation to the end of placentation. At day 78, half the ewes were killed and the fetal brains were perfused. The remaining ewes were re-alimented to 100% of nutritional requirements and killed at day 135. There was no effect of nutrition restriction or age on the number of GHRH neurons. Similarly, the mean density and percentage of somatotropes expressing GHRH receptors was not significantly different between treatment groups at either age. This study found no effect, as determined by immunocytochemistry, of nutrient restriction on the GHRH component of the fetal neuroendocrine GH axis. It remains to be established if the release of GHRH and responsiveness of somatotropes to GHRH in the fetus are affected by undernutrition.


Subject(s)
Fetal Development , Food Deprivation , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone/physiology , Neurons/metabolism , Receptors, Neuropeptide/physiology , Receptors, Pituitary Hormone-Regulating Hormone/physiology , Somatotrophs/metabolism , Animals , Female , Hypothalamus/embryology , Immunohistochemistry , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Pituitary Gland/embryology , Pregnancy , Sheep
2.
Growth Horm IGF Res ; 16(2): 108-18, 2006 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16600649

ABSTRACT

The maternal environment affects fetal development and may influence the physiology of the adult. Fetal growth hormone (GH) is increased by maternal undernutrition but the mechanisms responsible are unknown. This study determined the effect of maternal undernutrition on the development of fetal pituitary somatotropes in the female. Ewes were grouped randomly into control (fed 100% of requirements) or nutrient restricted (fed 50%) from Days 28 to 78 of gestation. At Day 78, the ewes were killed and fetuses collected (Day 78 NR (nutrient restricted): n=6; Day 78C (control): n=6). Remaining ewes were realimented to 100% of nutritional requirements and were killed at Day 135 (Day 135 NR (nutrient restricted): n=6; Day 135 C (control): n=6). Somatotropes were visualized immunocytochemically and the size, mean density, total percentage and proportion colocalized with substance P were determined for each group. Nutrient restriction increased (p<0.01) the density of pituitary cells in Day 78 fetuses but this difference was no longer apparent by Day 135 after realimentation. The density and proportion of somatotropes were not different between treatment groups at Day 78 but were significantly (p<0.05) lower in the nutrient restricted Day 135 fetuses as compared to the Day 135 control animals. Somatotropes from restricted fetuses were significantly (p<0.001) larger at Day 78. Nutrient restriction increased the density (p<0.001) and percentage (p<0.05) of substance P-immunoreactive cells Day 135 fetuses. Similarly, the proportion of somatotropes that expressed substance P was significantly (p<0.05) increased by nutrient restriction in the Day 135 fetuses. Although nearly two thirds of substance P-immunoreactive cells co-expressed GH, there was no significant effect of treatment on this co-expression. Additional studies are required to determine if other components of the neuroendocrine GH axis are affected by this nutritional insult, if the alterations that we have observed, particularly in the tachykinin system, persist into adulthood and, importantly, what are the long-term consequences of an altered GH axis.


Subject(s)
Fetal Development , Food Deprivation , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Growth Hormone/biosynthesis , Pituitary Gland/metabolism , Substance P/biosynthesis , Animals , Female , Maternal-Fetal Exchange , Pituitary Gland/pathology , Pregnancy , Sheep
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...